Picking the Cocoforcannabis site apart. They get about 25ppm Ca from calmag and 80ppm from a half dose of the micro. They do start higher and finish lower, but that's in range for 80% of their crop. Canna coco is 100ppm and floranova about the same 105ppm. The calmag they use is GH and says not for use with Nova as it's already there. Me.. I get 50 from my base and usually 35 from my calmag. But have been what looked like pouring it in, and still my total kept below 110ppm. However, I have my tap 60ppm to add, and using Nitric to convert at least half of it. I'm never far from these other bottle options. I don't see any spotting, though not all studies found spotting to be the result of low Ca and do sound a little familiar in the stunting of top growth, light colour in what does grow and the thinner leaf base Report: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/20/4432/htm
I also run everything else higher, which will mean I should have a bit more Ca not a bit less.
My previous run I did the first two weeks at 130ppm+tap but reduced it just a week before the problems start date. My best runs, when I first built this, I ran just 75-85ppm.
Calcium alone isn't going to change much. I have found my way to the ballpark it seems. Still not playing ball though.
It's nice to see a spread of results and pick through them.
Edit: It raises the question of how much next time. 120+tap, Or 150 if RO ? (tap is 60)
Grow Lights really can slow down a plant.
I've had plants under a new 250 watt metal halide.
Then put them outside, and it's obvious they like the sunlight a lot more.
I put plants out most years. The weather is everywhere. Hot then cold. Dry then raining. Sun then storm. Many times they do better than ones left indoors with their perfect environment. Kinda takes the biscuit
ThisIf your nutrient mix going in is pH 6.3 you're way too high. pH should be at 5.8. If you were in Pro Mix then pH 6.3 would be fine, but you're not, you're in coco