Z
zen_trikester
OK Hydro I see your point. I definitely don't think that excusivity should be the goal. I think Humboldt is pretty unique in that regard because of the branding issue, and something will be needed to control the boom anyways.So protectionism is good and every grower should find a group to align with and exclude all others? This sounds like some of the lamest shit ever.
Our fundamental disagreement is that you think government should be "Proactive" and I think that government has extremely LIMITED power and should do NOTHING except those VERY FEW enumerated items in the constitution.
I know that collectivists and stateists are the norm even in a weed growing community. How sad for me.
My point about everyone going out and proposing legislation is to settle their issues. Humboldt's issues are pretty obvious. Some municipalities will be needed to be convinced to even allow anything, so that would be different tactic. Some places will need to figure out how to ballance hemp with outdoor mmj crops. Some will need to be encouraged to make room for smaller growers mixed in with the big dogs in case the big dogs all get shafted. All I'm saying is find out what their concerns are and try to incorporate them into a document that also settles your concerns. Humboldt's needs are unique as will be the needs of each municipality. If you don't be a part of that you are missing out.
Jed