The study of historiography exists to address the problem of the winner writing the history.
It is the study of the writing of history, especially that based on the critical examination of sources and the synthesis of chosen particulars from those sources into a narrative that will stand the test of critical methods.
Claiming that we should not teach history at all is simply insane, imho.....perhaps it could be done with less bias and more comparative liturature, but not to teach it at all is just fucking ludicrous.
It is the study of the writing of history, especially that based on the critical examination of sources and the synthesis of chosen particulars from those sources into a narrative that will stand the test of critical methods.
Claiming that we should not teach history at all is simply insane, imho.....perhaps it could be done with less bias and more comparative liturature, but not to teach it at all is just fucking ludicrous.