Your EC is not 443. An EC of 2.0 is high, 443 is impossible.
It's 443 ppm TDS which means a EC of 0.692 for my tap water.
Your EC is not 443. An EC of 2.0 is high, 443 is impossible.
I think he might mean TDS...Your EC is not 443. An EC of 2.0 is high, 443 is impossible.
It's 443 ppm TDS which means a EC of 0.692 for my tap water.
You are seriously confused. First you told me your EC was 443, then it was 0.692, now it's 0.443? I think you think you know a lot more than you actually do.
There are multiple PPM scales. If you are using TDS PPM, the scale is .500. TDS PPM to EC is a straightforward calculation, and none of the numbers you provided add up.
Light leaks is the problem. Several pages later and the light leaks have not been fixed. This is the problem, fix it and your plants will stop throwing balls.
You forgot to multiply by 2!This has nothing to do with knowledge i just thought my EC meter shows it in ppm TDS.
But checked on the instruction of the EC meter that it is in microsiemens.
Which means 443ms->0.443EC
Sorry for the confusing.
You forgot to multiply by 2!
TDS to EC =(T/1000)*2
(443/1000)*2= 0.886
EC to TDS = (E*1000)/2
(0.886*1000)/2= 443ppm
Those are the formulas!
Just because you use on online calculator, it doesn't mean it is accurate!
Just because you use on online calculator, it doesn't mean it is accurate!
My reference ISBN: 978 187 8823 342 pg 222/223
... check the scale each manufacturer uses to measure mS/cm with their meter. Here are the values that 3 major manufacturers assign:
Therefore...
- Hanna: 1mS/cm = 500 ppm
- Eutech: 1mS/cm = 640 ppm; and
- New Zealand Hydro: 1mS/cm = 700 ppm
... would a simple removal of that male branch (or any other for that matter) suffice to prevent pollination, if you can reverse the stress, or is it too late by that time e.g the plant is in self-preservation mode?
Gotcha moose!When I discover a TRUE hermaphrodite I cull it immediately. Haven't had one in years. The genes are skewed beyond anything I want to deal with.
If it's just a matter of (limited) male stress flowers on a true female plant, then I try to assess if it's me/my mix/my feeding, or if the plant in question stresses really easily.
If it's a matter of a vulnerable plant, that will only perform correctly in a very narrow range of environment/feed/etc. I cull it.
If it's a pant that I know for a fact has the capacity to grow properly in the right conditions, then I cull the plant(s) -I- screwed up, and start over, but without discarding those genes altogether.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]... it only means your meter is/may be calibrated by the mfr using a 500 ppm X factor, not 1000 ppm as you claim, from what I have read. The formula is as previously stated.I think you got something wrong.
My EC Meter is in microsiemens not ppm.
I have 443 microS.
1 EC=1000 µS/cm
Which means i have 0.443EC
Gotcha moose!
However, if a plant only grows a branch or 2 with pollen sacks (the remainder female flowers), can one simply remove the offending branches, to prevent fertilizing the female pods, or is the plant a total waste e.g it won't produce mature colas? Of course this is all presuming we found out what caused the stress in the 1st place and rectified it?