What's new
  • ICMag with help from Phlizon, Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest for Christmas! You can check it here. Prizes are: full spectrum led light, seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Have you looked at the North Pole lately?

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
you can bury your yead in the sand all you want, but i ain't stupid for noticing the major problems... maybe once the economic ramifications are too much to ignore, maybe then fox news and newsmax will talk about it.
You’re obviously not old enough to remember these same people and institutions telling us an ice age was coming fast.

 

arsekick

Well-known member
Global warming solved and it will only cost 200 trillion $, its only fair that you brainwashedfools believers cover the cost

 

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
For the new guys.
IMG_1654.png
 

Porky82

Well-known member
Global warming solved and it will only cost 200 trillion $, its only fair that you brainwashedfools believers cover the cost

Yeah this seems like a bad idea. 🤣
Maybe we could just burn less fossil fuels. 🤔
How's ya coal shares going??
 

Porky82

Well-known member
Experts suck at predicting future events precisely.

If you knew the mathematical tools the models use you’d know they can’t provide accurate long term predictions. Just check out the term “sensitivity to initial conditions”.
Wake upto yourself. Your a nobody on a weed forum who thinks they know more about the climate than peer reviewed scientific research done by credible scientists. 🤣
It's actually pathetic that you could be so arrogant.
 

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
Wake upto yourself. Your a nobody on a weed forum who thinks they know more about the climate than peer reviewed scientific research done by credible scientists. 🤣
It's actually pathetic that you could be so arrogant.
I did a paper on weather models in the 1990’s for my ap calculus class. Which doesn’t make me an expert, just more informed than you.
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
I did a paper on weather models in the 1990’s for my ap calculus class. Which doesn’t make me an expert, just more informed than you.
that's relevant but insufficient for your claims
are you more informed than the experts you're dismissing?
 

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
that's relevant but insufficient for your claims
are you more informed than the experts you're dismissing?
None of the real experts that write the models are predicting catastrophe. That’s mostly people that can’t even solve a quadratic equation.

When asked for proof of how and why the formulas work, the people that have no idea use a call to authority argument to silence dissent.
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
None of the real experts that write the models are predicting catastrophe. That’s mostly people that can’t even solve a quadratic equation.

When asked for proof of how and why the formulas work, the people that have no idea use a call to authority argument to silence dissent.

you're blending two separate topics in your post
let's address no catastrophe, strictly speaking that's not an issue a climate scientist can speak to
they can authoritatively discuss climate models and future climate conditions
catastrophe falls in other specialist domains, of which there are many possibilities
 
Last edited:

nepalnt21

FRRRRRResh!
Veteran
predicting catastrophe
dude, this shit is ALREADY HAPPENING, we don't need soothesayers or math models to predict the future... just look out the window! food supply, etc... like i said, at some point the economic impact will be too much even for consurvoturds to ignore.
 

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
dude, this shit is ALREADY HAPPENING, we don't need soothesayers or math models to predict the future... just look out the window! food supply, etc... like i said, at some point the economic impact will be too much even for consurvoturds to ignore.
We have enough food supply for billions more than it was predicted we’d be overpopulated and starve.

I can tell you’re not very old. “Science” has been “predicting” one catastrophe after another that never happens.
 

nepalnt21

FRRRRRResh!
Veteran
"science" doesn't do anything, science is a process we use... and using past wrongs in "science" (whatever you specifically are referring to) as an argument against current scientific consensus is fallacious.

bring more than infographics to the table when you're going up against scientific consensus.

what if you're wrong? you're willing to bet the human race?
 

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
"science" doesn't do anything, science is a process we use... and using past wrongs in "science" (whatever you specifically are referring to) as an argument against current scientific consensus is fallacious.

bring more than infographics to the table when you're going up against scientific consensus.

what if you're wrong? you're willing to bet the human race?
Science is practiced by people. People who want nothing more than their theories to be verified. Over 1/3 of all papers published in the past 20 years are fraudulent.

Science is great. People lie regularly.
"science" doesn't do anything, science is a process we use... and using past wrongs in "science" (whatever you specifically are referring to) as an argument against current scientific consensus is fallacious.

bring more than infographics to the table when you're going up against scientific consensus.

what if you're wrong? you're willing to bet the human race?
Stay afraid, it makes it easier for the rest of us.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top