What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Have You Been Vaccinated?

Have You Been Vaccinated?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 62 31.0%
  • No!

    Votes: 43 21.5%
  • Soon!

    Votes: 15 7.5%
  • No Way!

    Votes: 66 33.0%
  • I Just Wanna Watch!

    Votes: 14 7.0%

  • Total voters
    200

Amynamous

Active member
Was some serious Nausea one of the symptoms ?

Nausea with no vomiting ?

Yes, the first round I had nausea and also had low grade fever, non productive cough, sore throat and remember being tired. It could have been the flu, but it didn’t feel like the flu.
 

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Alternative way to protect yourself if you believe this WuFlu BS. Fuck foochie.

.https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/how-do-i-get-covid-19-medication/

Not a day goes by without a video being forwarded to me accompanied by the question, “Is this true?” Invariably the answer is “um..no..there is no evidence,” and that usually ends the discussion. Sometimes, though, I can discern that a video has legs because I get the “Is this true?” query several times a day. An example of this is a recent epic, dripping with pseudoscience, produced by Dr. Lee Merritt an American orthopedic surgeon. Dr. Merritt may be a fine orthopedic surgeon, but when it comes to the science of COVID-19, she is a bumbling neophyte.

Suspicion is immediately aroused when Merritt is identified as a member of “America’s Frontline Doctors,” a handful of conspiracy-minded physicians that include luminaries such as Dr. Stella Immanuel who alleges that alien DNA is being used in medical treatments and that researchers are working on a vaccine to prevent people from becoming religious. She also believes in a conspiracy by the “Illuminati” to destroy the world with abortion, gay marriage, and of all things, children’s toys. As far as gynecological diseases go, they can be caused by having sex with witches and demons that appear in dreams.

Then we have the founder of “America’s Frontline Doctors,” Dr. Simone Gold, who was arrested for taking part in the January 6 attack on the Capitol. She has a sordid history of attacking Dr. Fauci’s sound scientific advice and claiming that COVID-19 vaccines are “experimental biological agents.” She warns people not to be “coerced” into taking them. Lockdowns, this guru maintains, have mental health effects that are more harmful than those caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which according to her, are minimal. Dr. Gold trots out the usual nonsensical trope about 99% of infections by the virus being harmless. While it is true that most infected people experience mild or moderate symptoms, roughly 10-15% progress to serious disease and about 5% become critically ill. In some cases, symptoms can linger for months, maybe even years.

In any case, these fine specimens of the medical profession maintain that there is no need to worry even if someone contracts COVID-19 because “simple effective treatments are available.” It is at this point that the snake in the grass, namely hydroxychloroquine, rears its head. Not only is this medication presented as a treatment, but hydroxychloroquine is also claimed to prevent infection if taken prophylactically. Initially, there were some seductive results with hydroxychloroquine, but subsequent trials that were better designed failed to produce any positive results and some even suggested complications in terms of heart function. Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic medication used in animals is also championed by America’s Frontline Doctors. While there are theoretical possibilities for some benefit, so far clinical trials have been inconclusive, with some showing no effect, and others demonstrating a decrease in inflammatory markers as well as a shorter time for viral clearance. Certainly, ivermectin is not a “magic bullet” that targets COVID-19 as claimed.

Then there are the conspiracy theories. “Big Pharma” is said to be hiding hydroxychloroquine benefits because this cheap drug would undermine the potential profits from vaccines. And of course, as the convoluted story goes, those vaccines have not been properly tested and mess with our DNA. This handful of physicians, who have no specific training in epidemiology, virology or infectious disease, claim to have better knowledge of COVID-19 than the thousands of academic and pharmaceutical researchers who have forged specialized careers in these areas. The only expertise they have actually demonstrated is in spreading misinformation and undermining evidence-based advice.

The conspiracy theories continue with some more unabashed nonsense about two factories manufacturing ingredients for hydroxychloroquine pills mysteriously blowing up simultaneously. Of course, the insinuation is that this was done by the nefarious vaccine promoters to protect their profits. The story is that these factories were producing magnesium stearate, “the key component in hydroxychloroquine.” To start with, magnesium stearate is not a “key component.” It is an inactive ingredient used in many pills as an internal lubricant that prevents the active ingredient from clumping during manufacture. The Mexican factory cited doesn’t even produce magnesium stearate, neither does the other company in Madison, Illinois. And the plants didn’t blow up! They did experience unrelated fires.

Dr. Merritt buys into all these conspiracy theories and the various pseudoscientific treatments. Masks are useless, she says, and meetings with friends should be encouraged. Along with her Frontline Doctor colleagues, she demonstrates an ignorance of science and the scientific method, and her rebuke of COVID vaccines puts people who follow her advice at risk. She does, however, get one thing right. In the video, she mentions that a low blood level of vitamin D is a risk factor for COVID-19 and correctly suggests that supplements may be useful, especially in northern climates where sun exposure in the winter may be minimal. As for the rest of the garbled word salad in this painful thirty-minute long video, let’s be kind and just say “ummm, there is no evidence.”

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/c...oscience/back-away-americas-frontline-doctors
 

moose eater

Well-known member
Not a day goes by without a video being forwarded to me accompanied by the question, “Is this true?” Invariably the answer is “um..no..there is no evidence,” and that usually ends the discussion. Sometimes, though, I can discern that a video has legs because I get the “Is this true?” query several times a day. An example of this is a recent epic, dripping with pseudoscience, produced by Dr. Lee Merritt an American orthopedic surgeon. Dr. Merritt may be a fine orthopedic surgeon, but when it comes to the science of COVID-19, she is a bumbling neophyte.

Suspicion is immediately aroused when Merritt is identified as a member of “America’s Frontline Doctors,” a handful of conspiracy-minded physicians that include luminaries such as Dr. Stella Immanuel who alleges that alien DNA is being used in medical treatments and that researchers are working on a vaccine to prevent people from becoming religious. She also believes in a conspiracy by the “Illuminati” to destroy the world with abortion, gay marriage, and of all things, children’s toys. As far as gynecological diseases go, they can be caused by having sex with witches and demons that appear in dreams.

Then we have the founder of “America’s Frontline Doctors,” Dr. Simone Gold, who was arrested for taking part in the January 6 attack on the Capitol. She has a sordid history of attacking Dr. Fauci’s sound scientific advice and claiming that COVID-19 vaccines are “experimental biological agents.” She warns people not to be “coerced” into taking them. Lockdowns, this guru maintains, have mental health effects that are more harmful than those caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which according to her, are minimal. Dr. Gold trots out the usual nonsensical trope about 99% of infections by the virus being harmless. While it is true that most infected people experience mild or moderate symptoms, roughly 10-15% progress to serious disease and about 5% become critically ill. In some cases, symptoms can linger for months, maybe even years.

In any case, these fine specimens of the medical profession maintain that there is no need to worry even if someone contracts COVID-19 because “simple effective treatments are available.” It is at this point that the snake in the grass, namely hydroxychloroquine, rears its head. Not only is this medication presented as a treatment, but hydroxychloroquine is also claimed to prevent infection if taken prophylactically. Initially, there were some seductive results with hydroxychloroquine, but subsequent trials that were better designed failed to produce any positive results and some even suggested complications in terms of heart function. Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic medication used in animals is also championed by America’s Frontline Doctors. While there are theoretical possibilities for some benefit, so far clinical trials have been inconclusive, with some showing no effect, and others demonstrating a decrease in inflammatory markers as well as a shorter time for viral clearance. Certainly, ivermectin is not a “magic bullet” that targets COVID-19 as claimed.

Then there are the conspiracy theories. “Big Pharma” is said to be hiding hydroxychloroquine benefits because this cheap drug would undermine the potential profits from vaccines. And of course, as the convoluted story goes, those vaccines have not been properly tested and mess with our DNA. This handful of physicians, who have no specific training in epidemiology, virology or infectious disease, claim to have better knowledge of COVID-19 than the thousands of academic and pharmaceutical researchers who have forged specialized careers in these areas. The only expertise they have actually demonstrated is in spreading misinformation and undermining evidence-based advice.

The conspiracy theories continue with some more unabashed nonsense about two factories manufacturing ingredients for hydroxychloroquine pills mysteriously blowing up simultaneously. Of course, the insinuation is that this was done by the nefarious vaccine promoters to protect their profits. The story is that these factories were producing magnesium stearate, “the key component in hydroxychloroquine.” To start with, magnesium stearate is not a “key component.” It is an inactive ingredient used in many pills as an internal lubricant that prevents the active ingredient from clumping during manufacture. The Mexican factory cited doesn’t even produce magnesium stearate, neither does the other company in Madison, Illinois. And the plants didn’t blow up! They did experience unrelated fires.

Dr. Merritt buys into all these conspiracy theories and the various pseudoscientific treatments. Masks are useless, she says, and meetings with friends should be encouraged. Along with her Frontline Doctor colleagues, she demonstrates an ignorance of science and the scientific method, and her rebuke of COVID vaccines puts people who follow her advice at risk. She does, however, get one thing right. In the video, she mentions that a low blood level of vitamin D is a risk factor for COVID-19 and correctly suggests that supplements may be useful, especially in northern climates where sun exposure in the winter may be minimal. As for the rest of the garbled word salad in this painful thirty-minute long video, let’s be kind and just say “ummm, there is no evidence.”

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/c...oscience/back-away-americas-frontline-doctors

But hey, it sounded good, and was well-suited to my preconceived 'knowledge' and warped political agenda, involving tilting at imaginary windmills, often facilitated by use of half, no, quarter-truths.
 

moose eater

Well-known member
Having been properly vaccinated and documented to prove such, the Alaska-Canada Border, having been closed to all but 'essential travel' since about March of 2020, will re-open to us Yanks, for non-essential travel, as of August 9th, 2021, at 12:01 A.M., providing persons can prove they've received an accepted form of COVID-19 vaccination in advance, docu8mented through a site called ArriveCAN (*on-line and quick completion), AND, have a recent negative molecular (or antigen) test in possession at the time of crossing the Border, showing no current infection. They are reportedly not going to be accepting antibody tests as adequate at the Border, but I/we need to clarify this a bit further. Maybe a call to the Border later on, closer to the time of any trip there..

It's been 2 years since we were able to troll Aishihik Lake for lake trout, or fish graying below the dam on the 'bad days', but it looks like this may be the opportunity for my son and I, and maybe my wife, too, as well as our 3 pups if my wife attends, to return to our favorite place to soak up rays, and dip a lure, jig, or just plain old bait. August is the windy season, and July's weather, with less wind and waves, would've been preferred on that lake, but it is what it is.. Fish ON!!

Getting vaxxed appears to be paying off.. again. And in ways we didn't originally plan for. Just have to make it work with a Seattle and other medical appointments.
 
M

member 505892

Very cringey channel name (imo) but decent channel.
I particularly liked the videos about the trainwreck that is Brian Rose, but this episode is about Ivermectin, does it help or not?
Trying to separate the bro-science from actual science, misinformation from actual helpful information, if anyone is interested....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_42...el=RebelWisdom
 

flylowgethigh

Non-growing Lurker
ICMag Donor
How is my refusal to let them put something into my body selfish? I am not sick, nobody is catching anything from me but a buzz, and my blood is still pure. I predict blood donors having to admit to their jabbing, so their blood can be isolated like AIDs infested blood, cause it is tainted. Crap? That's your opinion, and yours has been molded by the propaganda... and probably because you have been jabbed.

It is hard to admit you have been fooled. Hang a pic of foochie on the mantle like some little religious shrine, flowers and candles too. And don't toss those masks, he says that you still need them.

I have had 2 recent elective surgeries, and both times refused to allow them to put blood into me, even in an emergency.

I am not taking the damn jab, and I say that with great conviction.

This jab crap over a fake pandemic has changed the world.
 
Last edited:

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
There is no virus.

yup. hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of people all over the world just dropped dead for no apparent reason over the last 8 or 9 months. and many more will cut their noses off to spite their faces in the coming months for the same damn reason. i say "let those die..." you can't fix stupid, and it's time that we stopped trying to keep it alive. unhook the fucking oxygen!
 

flylowgethigh

Non-growing Lurker
ICMag Donor
Smoke a doob after reading this, and forget all about it. Safest and easiest way. What if...

the jab has graphene in it, graphene that becomes magnetic inside the body and since red bloodcells have high iron content they naturally clump together around the graphene particles causing thousand and more minor bloodclots.. clots that will clog up your lungs over time making the heart have to work harder and strain.. Most will die from this within 3 years from a right sided infarction typically and the s-protein while being active and shedding in its initial stage also will activate and shed each time a natural flu or cold rolls around several times a year sterilizing anyone the jabbed gets in close contact with.. If u go to wikipedia and read about graphene, pay especial focus on this part: "Charge carriers in graphene show linear, rather than quadratic, dependence of energy on momentum, and field-effect transistors with graphene can be made that show bipolar conduction. Charge transport is ballistic over long distances; the material exhibits large quantum oscillations and large and nonlinear diamagnetism.[6] Graphene conducts heat and electricity very efficiently along its plane. The material strongly absorbs light of all visible wavelengths" This explains all the things people are observing with the jabbed and the jab itself.. it is why the jab needs to be transported so frozen so the graphene wont be magnetized and bind to itself causing massive instant bloodclots (those are typically from the bottle of vaxxine (though i loathe to call it that) having been too hot and been magnetically activated through transport or simply sitting on the jab trays in room temperature for a while.. it also explains why the jabbed seems to glow subdermically when exposed to light of a certain wavelenght..
 

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
glowing.jpg
glow.jpg
 

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/there-is-no-conclusive-evidence-that-the-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-contains-graphene-oxide/

StewPetersJaneRuby.png

CLAIM
“These Spanish researchers have found that over 99 percent of the Pfizer vaccine is graphene oxide.”

VERDICT
HTag_Inaccurate.png



SOURCE: Jane Ruby, Stew Peters, Stew Peters Show, 5 Jul. 2021


DETAILS
Unsupported: There is no evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine contains graphene. The only sample used in the study is of unknown origin and traceability. Lists of the vaccine’s ingredients released by Pfizer-BioNTech do not include graphene oxide. The analysis, done using electron microscopy, is also inconclusive.
Misleading: These claims state that the analysis is an official study from the University of Almería. However, the university has “unequivocally” distanced itself from the analysis that claims to have found graphene oxide in a vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The university also made it clear it doesn’t endorse the analysis.

KEY TAKE AWAY
grey_bulb.png

Claims that a study from the University of Almería, Spain, found graphene oxide in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, contain numerous inaccuracies. Firstly, the alleged vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine analyzed is of unknown origin and traceability. Secondly, the methodology used for the analysis, electron microscopy, is inconclusive. Thirdly, the list of ingredients in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which can be found in the vaccine’s package insert, don’t include graphene; these package inserts are rigorously reviewed by health authorities. Lastly, the analysis isn’t an official study from the University of Almería, which distanced itself from the analysis and its conclusions.


FULL CLAIM: “The group is called La Quinta Columna, the fifth column, and they are associated with the University of Almería, but what they did was they got a Pfizer vial […] and here’s the shocking information” ; ‘These Spanish researchers have found that over 99 percent of the Pfizer vaccine is graphene oxide”​


REVIEW


Claims that a study from the University of Almería in Spain found graphene oxide in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine have been circulating in Spanish-language Telegram channels for weeks. These claims gained force in late June 2021 when microscopy images allegedly comparing graphene oxide and the contents of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine from a research study were posted on a Telegram channel. The claims have now spread through a number of social media platforms, such as TikTok and Facebook, and in a number of languages including Portuguese and now English.

As part of the #CoronaVirusFacts Alliance led by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), which “unites more than 100 fact-checkers around the world in publishing, sharing and translating facts surrounding the new coronavirus”, Health Feedback has translated the fact-check for this claim, published by Spanish fact-checking organization Newtral.es, a fellow signatory of the IFCN code of principles.
English Translation:


You have asked us through our WhatsApp verification service (+34 627 28 08 15) if it is true that the University of Almería [a public university in Almería, Spain] has published a study that shows the presence of graphene in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. This is false.

Although a document concerning vaccines and graphene oxide on which the university’s seal appears has gone viral, this document isn’t endorsed by the University of Almería. In fact, the academic institution has “unequivocally” distanced itself from this alleged study and its conclusions.

The viral document is neither a scientifically supported study nor does it provide conclusive evidence that the authorized COVID-19 vaccines contain either graphene or graphene oxide, as claimed in different viral messages that have been disseminated with a link to the document.

The author of the report compared images obtained via electron microscopy. One of them is from a sample of graphene oxide, and the other of a liquid that, according to the document, could be the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, although the product’s “origin and traceability is unknown”.

Based on the scientific evidence available, experts who spoke to Newtral.es refuted that the authorized COVID-19 vaccines are made with graphene, an ingredient that doesn’t appear on the vaccine’s package inserts, which are rigorously reviewed by health authorities.
The origin of the analyzed sample of the presumed vaccine: unknown


The document you have asked us about, titled “Detection of graphene oxide in aqueous suspensions (Cominarty)” was published 28 June 2021 and shared on various anti-vaccine websites.

Comirnaty is the commercial name of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, but as we have already shown, there is no evidence that the liquid analyzed in the document is from this vaccine.

The document’s author acknowledges that a vial arrived by “courier” service, but that he doesn’t know its traceability. In addition, he also clarifies that the person who sent him this supposed vial is Ricardo Delgado Martín, who has disseminated anti-vaccine content.
The document doesn’t show that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains graphene


The document we are analyzing isn’t published in a prestigious scientific journal in its field, which provides a “quality seal” to scientific work. There is also no evidence that the text has been validated by the scientific community through the process known as peer review, in which the methodology, interpretation, results, and conclusions are checked.

As is made clear in the document, it’s an “interim report” whose objective is the “microscopic identification of graphene derivatives” in an alleged sample of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. To do this, images of the sample, obtained through electron microscopy, are compared with images of “reduced graphene oxide” taken from the scientific literature.

As stated in the publication, the images present “a high similarity” to each other, therefore, from this comparison, it is concluded that “the microscopic study of the sample provides evidence of the probable presence of graphene derivatives.”

However, the author proceeds to acknowledge that “microcopy doesn’t provide conclusive evidence” and that the “analyses in this report are from a single, limited sample.”

“It is therefore necessary to carry out a significant sampling of similar vials to draw conclusions that can be generalized to comparable samples, recording origin, traceability and quality control during conservation and transport prior to analysis,” the document highlights.

Ultimately, the publication doesn’t provide conclusive evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine contains graphene oxide. Nor that it contains graphene, as claimed in anti-vaccine messages. Here you can access the package insert for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which lists the components of this vaccine (on page 11 ) [Health Feedback: The full list of ingredients can be seen on page 29].

Newtral.es has already explained that there is no evidence that the other authorized COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene, as the president of the Spanish Vaccination Association, Amós García, explained to us.
The University of Almería has distanced itself from the alleged analysis


The individual who signs the report that we are verifying is Pablo Campra, a researcher and professor at the University of Almería.

Campra himself highlights in the document that the results “do not imply any position of the University of Almería” and that neither he nor the university “assume any responsibility for the content and opinion of third parties.”

However, because the university’s logo appears on the document, COVID-19 denialist groups are sharing the alleged analysis of the vaccine as an official study from an academic institution.

The University of Almería has already “unequivocally” distanced itself from the researcher’s conclusions in the document and, in fact, clarifies that it is not a scientific study endorsed by the university, while reminding that the substance being analyzed is of “unknown” origin.






“This university neither endorses nor shares” the study’s conclusions, since it is an “unofficial report by a university professor of an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with a complete lack of traceability’, the university highlighted in an official statement released on Friday, 2 July.

Sources from the university confirmed to Newtral.es that the office of the university’s president has already contacted the researcher for having used the institutional image of the university in an analysis that, they insist, “is not official” nor is it part of a scientific investigation endorsed by the institution.

The statement clarifies that “the University of Almería, as an academic institution, wholeheartedly supports vaccines as a scientifically unquestionable instrument to fight against diseases.”
False messages about graphene oxide nanoparticles and vaccines


In the last few weeks, other messages claiming that “there are studies” proving that the authorized COVID-19 vaccines “contain graphene oxide” have been shared. To support these claims, the messages include links to a research article published on 11 May 2021 in the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

This article, which includes Georgia State University (United States) researcher Chunhong Dong, is about the development of a potential intranasal vaccine against influenza that is still in a preliminary phase and has only been studied in animal models.

In this experimental vaccine, the properties of “polyethyleneimine-functionalized graphene oxide nanoparticles” are analyzed, but Chunhong Dong, from Georgia State University and one of the authors of the study, clarifies to Newtral.es that this vaccine has not been authorized and studies are in a very early stage.

Additionally, Dong adds that she is not aware of any vaccine containing graphene oxide nanoparticles being licensed and that the study doesn’t prove such a thing.

As already explained in Newtral.es, all vaccines have to pass through numerous controls and tests in which their safety and efficacy are guaranteed.


REFERENCES


University of Almería Statement.

Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine Data Sheet.

Statements to Newtral.es from Chunhong Dong of Georgia State University.

Research paper published 11 May in the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
https://healthfeedback.org/claimrev...ech-covid-19-vaccine-contains-graphene-oxide/
https://healthfeedback.org/claimrev...ech-covid-19-vaccine-contains-graphene-oxide/
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top