apparently MIT doesn't have a course called "how to tell if you're wasting your time trying to convince people on a pot growing site you have the slightest clue what you're talking about" 101
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Have You Been Vaccinated?
- Thread starter Tudo
- Start date
Hiddenjems
Well-known member
I know a lot of people that feel the same way about coercion.
I think that better messaging focused on the high risk groups would have saved lives, money, and not hurt the economy as much.
Telling mom and dad to close their store so people can shop at Walmart is corporate influence at its best.
Yes that is exactly what happened.
Thanks but that's not clear enough.
Actual biology.
What did you study at MIT??
I can assure you that your grasp on biochemistry is lacking in the very least...
Broccoli is one of the most deadly plants known to man. You can tell by it's terrible taste.
Hiddenjems
Well-known member
I live in a small area. Over half of all the family owned restaurants and corner stores are no longer in business. Walmart was literally the only store in town open and selling groceries for almost 6 months. People decided they’d had enough and opened anyway defying orders. Those are the ones still opened. The compliant folks just sat there and took the d up their asses from the government.
Hiddenjems
Well-known member
All it took was a decent printer and you could fly around the country.
The neurotransmitter acetylcholine may be an untapped pathway for pain relief that doesn’t involve dangerous drugs like opioids. Researchers from the University of Chicago revealed that targeting an acetylcholine receptor led to pain-relieving effects in mice, even in animals that were tolerant to opioids.
The pain relief was powerful enough to rival that from opioids, but without the negative effects. The pathway did not activate the brain’s reward system, so there’s little chance of addiction, and there was no tolerance built up or withdrawal symptoms when the treatment stopped. Boosting choline, a precursor for acetylcholine, may therefore be an important part of pain relief, but many in the U.S. are deficient.
Eggs, particularly the yolks, are an excellent choline source. Among egg consumers, more than 57.3% met the adequate intake levels for choline, compared to just 2.4% of people who consumed no eggs. In fact, the researchers concluded that it’s “extremely difficult” to get enough choline unless you eat eggs or take a dietary supplement. Other dietary sources of choline include:
| Grass fed beef liver | Cauliflower | Atlantic cod |
| Alaskan salmon | Kidney beans | Quinoa |
| Brussels sprouts | Broccoli | Shiitake mushroom |
i like broccoli lightly steamed - say, about 3.5 minutes.
the internet was just a few people's wet dream in 1966 through 1970. we only had arpanet. i used to login to U of Edenborough to get the dirty limerick of the day. there were only 5 universities on arpanet.
you misconstrue my discussion about biology and the toxic jab juice. i am not trying to convince people of anything. i am relating disturbing facts, which i have found, about how biology is presented as a cartoon-ish representation of what the human body biology is actually about. the immune system is more, much more, than antibodies. and transfection is not immunization. and injecting toxins into the deltoid does NOT enhance the immune system. the immune system reacts, yes, that is what it is evolved to do when assaulted by toxins.
after 4 years of study i have found the biology of the immune system fascinating. i am trying to share my love of cellular biology. my vaporizer is my attempt to share my love of cannabis with the purest form of consumption. the design is open source. i have worked out the details and gladly share.
I'd prefer a vaporizer designed by the top 50%, above average MIT grads, thanks.
Hold on... Bud is actually trying to make the claim that he attended MIT?
We get it. You know how to use Wikepedia to make yourself seem smart. But it's really obvious you're not. You only think you're smart. You are a living, breathing Dunning-Krueger.
The Bud Toaster - (currently: Model 14, version 3)
Circuit Diagram for PWM controlled heater. Jan 10, 2010 Software for PIC 12F683 and current Bud Toaster photos posted on my Windows Live/SkyDrive: Bud Toaster project folder Schematics PDFs of assembly language program for 12F683 - 6 files photos of Lady Bud Toaster - Model 13 Version 5...
fuckcombustion.com
I'm in the experimental group...you're also welcome.
@buzzmobile thank-you for your service.
i launched that thread on fc after i started getting computer temperature control to some what work. it has evolved. i have tried a lot of different things - but always staying with the only glass vapor path.
i launched that thread on fc after i started getting computer temperature control to some what work. it has evolved. i have tried a lot of different things - but always staying with the only glass vapor path.
not only that, but i once rebooted the internet (technically still the arpanet) at Stanford AI lab (one of the 5 universities) online.
Genghis Kush.
Active member
That’s not me
I'm a curious bug so I had to check your Bud Toaster out. It was interesting to see your project evolve.
My service was in the Navy as a volunteer enlistee who had pulled a draft number of 5. When you were at MIT did you maintain a 2-S status during the draft years?
Yes. Got a 85 on the test to do grad school - I think 72 was sufficient to pass. Got my 4F after graduation - totally unfit to serve - I had allergies. I could just see me in the jungle sneezing and in comes an artillery barrage. I saved a lot of lives by going off to Stanford AI
My lottery number was ~132 - low enough to be drafted from my county.
from my research stack ...
Published with expressed written consent for Benjamin Roberts (Copyright © Oct 2023. Benjamin Roberts & EMS (LLC))
Just days ago, on October 2, 2023, I forwarded correspondence to the Nobel Peace Prize at their email contact page site on their awarding of their prize to Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman for their having 'saved lives' with their breakthrough feat of providing humanity the Covid-19 M-RNA vaccine. As what I submitted to them was typed into a comment box on that contact page, I have no way of retrieving that document, once submitted. As such I will attempt to paraphrase what was communicated to them, along with a request that they contact me back with any queries they might have, subsequent to what I shared. And based on what I shared they should have serious follow-up queries or comment. But as of now I have heard nothing back from them. Here is what I recall saying:
I am taken aback and quite disappointed that you would think it appropriate in awarding your prize to Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman for having 'saved lives' for their work on the Covid-19 M-RNA vaccine technology. There is no evidence this synthetic therapeutic saved lives, though that claim continues to be made 'ad infinitum.' I would point you to two documents that should have you seriously reconsidering your choice for this award.
The first is a document generated by the United States FDA at their in-house 'Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 22, 2020 Meeting Presentation' on the eve of the roll-out of the vaccines. The document is titled: 'FDA Safety Surveillance of Covid-19 Vaccine: DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes.' This document, available at their site in early 2021 when I accessed it, and to date still currently available, lists 22 serious side-effects likely to result from inoculation. And in fact, given the gravity of these conditions that result, it is too kind to call them side-effects. They should be more suitably referred to as 'health disabling conditions’, with 'death' being one of the listed. Hardly a criterion of recognition for having 'saved lives.' And subsequent to the implementation of these vaccines these ‘side effects’/’disabling health conditions’ have presented themselves starkly and with discomfiting regularity in real life for the vaccinated populace, only to be foolishly and recklessly dismissed time and time again as due to ‘underlying conditions.’ How utterly misleading.
Second is a document put out by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), which is their review of CDC data on deaths related to the pandemic for the years 2021-2022.This document titled: 'Share of Covid-19 Deaths by Vaccination Status, 30 Jurisdictions In the U.S., September 2021 to August 2022, Age 18 and Over.' Incidentally this novel document magically appeared within months of me taking the CDC to task for their lack of responsibility in failing to provide a version of their highly-regarded MMWR detailing Covid-19 deaths for the unvaccinated vs. vaccinated. This document, in its chart presentation shows that in the Fall of 2021 most deaths from Covid-19 was in the unvaccinated ranks. However, after a robust vaccination campaign in 2021 and the early part of 2022 with close to 70% of the American populace vaccinated, we then see a marked shift, with the majority of those deaths occurring not in the unvaccinated but rather those who had gotten their first round of Covid-19 vaccines [note these subjects were considered only 'partially vaccinated']. If they died within two weeks of their 1st dose and within two weeks of their 2nd dose they were classified as being 'unvaccinated' This questionable system of classification means the actual percentage of 'vaccinated deaths' is even much higher than the chart claims.
When put together, these two sources of sobering information leave no doubt that your Nobel Prize selection committee made a grave error in the selection of these two individuals to be awarded your prestigious prize. Finding this valuable information required a moderate degree of diligence on my part, and it is my assumption that an agency such as yours that prides itself on excellence, would have employed a higher level of due diligence of Covid-19 vaccine review in implementing your award. The question is this: ‘Is your Nobel Prize Committee, in making its selection, an unwitting participant in a misinformation exercise, or are you well aware of the easily accessed information I have provided you? My career background in research science affords me the ability to point out this poor decision on your part. Thank you, and do not hesitate to contact me on this matter.
Yours truly,
Benjamin Roberts B.Sc. MT, ASCP, M. Ac., L. Ac.
i just thought the mRNA idea was stupid. based on the biology and an understanding of the immune system. i looked up conjugate vaccines when two of the top officials at CDC resigned at the start of the pandemic. conjugate vaccines was one of their specialties. i immediate thought: autoimmune disease, incoming. in addition to the substitution of N1-methylpseudouridine in the RNA recipe which disables the innate immune system, the one that holds cancer at bay.
and they knew mRNA was a stupid idea and did it anyway. and they lied about it.
Published with expressed written consent for Benjamin Roberts (Copyright © Oct 2023. Benjamin Roberts & EMS (LLC))
Just days ago, on October 2, 2023, I forwarded correspondence to the Nobel Peace Prize at their email contact page site on their awarding of their prize to Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman for their having 'saved lives' with their breakthrough feat of providing humanity the Covid-19 M-RNA vaccine. As what I submitted to them was typed into a comment box on that contact page, I have no way of retrieving that document, once submitted. As such I will attempt to paraphrase what was communicated to them, along with a request that they contact me back with any queries they might have, subsequent to what I shared. And based on what I shared they should have serious follow-up queries or comment. But as of now I have heard nothing back from them. Here is what I recall saying:
I am taken aback and quite disappointed that you would think it appropriate in awarding your prize to Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman for having 'saved lives' for their work on the Covid-19 M-RNA vaccine technology. There is no evidence this synthetic therapeutic saved lives, though that claim continues to be made 'ad infinitum.' I would point you to two documents that should have you seriously reconsidering your choice for this award.
The first is a document generated by the United States FDA at their in-house 'Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 22, 2020 Meeting Presentation' on the eve of the roll-out of the vaccines. The document is titled: 'FDA Safety Surveillance of Covid-19 Vaccine: DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes.' This document, available at their site in early 2021 when I accessed it, and to date still currently available, lists 22 serious side-effects likely to result from inoculation. And in fact, given the gravity of these conditions that result, it is too kind to call them side-effects. They should be more suitably referred to as 'health disabling conditions’, with 'death' being one of the listed. Hardly a criterion of recognition for having 'saved lives.' And subsequent to the implementation of these vaccines these ‘side effects’/’disabling health conditions’ have presented themselves starkly and with discomfiting regularity in real life for the vaccinated populace, only to be foolishly and recklessly dismissed time and time again as due to ‘underlying conditions.’ How utterly misleading.
Second is a document put out by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), which is their review of CDC data on deaths related to the pandemic for the years 2021-2022.This document titled: 'Share of Covid-19 Deaths by Vaccination Status, 30 Jurisdictions In the U.S., September 2021 to August 2022, Age 18 and Over.' Incidentally this novel document magically appeared within months of me taking the CDC to task for their lack of responsibility in failing to provide a version of their highly-regarded MMWR detailing Covid-19 deaths for the unvaccinated vs. vaccinated. This document, in its chart presentation shows that in the Fall of 2021 most deaths from Covid-19 was in the unvaccinated ranks. However, after a robust vaccination campaign in 2021 and the early part of 2022 with close to 70% of the American populace vaccinated, we then see a marked shift, with the majority of those deaths occurring not in the unvaccinated but rather those who had gotten their first round of Covid-19 vaccines [note these subjects were considered only 'partially vaccinated']. If they died within two weeks of their 1st dose and within two weeks of their 2nd dose they were classified as being 'unvaccinated' This questionable system of classification means the actual percentage of 'vaccinated deaths' is even much higher than the chart claims.
When put together, these two sources of sobering information leave no doubt that your Nobel Prize selection committee made a grave error in the selection of these two individuals to be awarded your prestigious prize. Finding this valuable information required a moderate degree of diligence on my part, and it is my assumption that an agency such as yours that prides itself on excellence, would have employed a higher level of due diligence of Covid-19 vaccine review in implementing your award. The question is this: ‘Is your Nobel Prize Committee, in making its selection, an unwitting participant in a misinformation exercise, or are you well aware of the easily accessed information I have provided you? My career background in research science affords me the ability to point out this poor decision on your part. Thank you, and do not hesitate to contact me on this matter.
Yours truly,
Benjamin Roberts B.Sc. MT, ASCP, M. Ac., L. Ac.
i just thought the mRNA idea was stupid. based on the biology and an understanding of the immune system. i looked up conjugate vaccines when two of the top officials at CDC resigned at the start of the pandemic. conjugate vaccines was one of their specialties. i immediate thought: autoimmune disease, incoming. in addition to the substitution of N1-methylpseudouridine in the RNA recipe which disables the innate immune system, the one that holds cancer at bay.
and they knew mRNA was a stupid idea and did it anyway. and they lied about it.
and this is why granting the igNobel was important ...
from X:
Theme: Japanese abnormalities I tell you how abnormal the vaccine situation in Japan is.
The 7th booster vaccination of the mRNA vaccine has begun since Sep in Japan.
Let's look at the number of people vaccinated before and after the Nobel Prize.
Before the Nobel Prize: 1,674,634 (Oct 3rd, 2023)
After the Nobel Prize: 3,471,432 (Oct 10th, 2023)
(https://kantei.go.jp/jp/content/allbooster_data.pdf…)
The advertising effect of the Nobel Prize is tremendous. This is the current Japanese situation.
from X:
Theme: Japanese abnormalities I tell you how abnormal the vaccine situation in Japan is.
The 7th booster vaccination of the mRNA vaccine has begun since Sep in Japan.
Let's look at the number of people vaccinated before and after the Nobel Prize.
Before the Nobel Prize: 1,674,634 (Oct 3rd, 2023)
After the Nobel Prize: 3,471,432 (Oct 10th, 2023)
(https://kantei.go.jp/jp/content/allbooster_data.pdf…)
The advertising effect of the Nobel Prize is tremendous. This is the current Japanese situation.
