Have You Been Vaccinated?

[buzzmobile]

More aggressive CRC, Oesophageal cancer, Breast cancers (20+ tumours in the brain again) and especially TNBC, and more Lymphoma. Cancers going suddenly and hugely out of control after a 'Booster shot'?


Turbo cancer. It’s the new pandemic.

Turbo Cancer - the new Pandemic? | CANCERactive

Are we about to see a new pandemic - turbo cancer? Booster shots of mRNA vaccines seem capable of waking up cancer, (and dormant viruses) in the body; doctors and oncologists have noticed it, scientists are studying it.

www.canceractive.com

One of the oldest antivax tropes, one I recall encountering beginning soon after I started paying attention to the antivaccine movement, is that vaccines somehow cause cancer.

He pushed hydroxychloroquine three years ago: Harvey Risch and false claim of “turbo cancers” caused by COVID-19 vaccines

Last week, I discussed Dr. William Makis' false claims of "turbo cancers" due to COVID-19 vaccines. Now it's hydroxychloroquine-promoting epidemiologist Harvey Risch's turn.

sciencebasedmedicine.org

Dr. William Makis and “turbo cancer”: Falsely blaming COVID-19 vaccines for cancer

A prominent oncologist and cancer biologist, Wafik El-Deiry, recently amplified claims that COVID-19 vaccines cause "turbo cancer," wanting a "civil discourse about science and actual answers that are

sciencebasedmedicine.org

 

[GOT_BUD?]

He's working on his doctoral thesis. It's not a hobby.

He needs a refund.

 

[BudToaster]

as JJCouey recently said on a podcast talking about his love for the sacredness of biology ...

[I have a] firm and beautiful respect for nature and how complex it is.​

​

the appreciation that you need to have as a biologist is that there's​

so much we are never going to be able to figure out because it is this ​

complex interactions with complex interactions with complex interactions​

with pattern integrity.​

i have loved being involved with computers since 1965 - and especially the AI of the late 1960s and early 1970s - and that it provides a wonderful model of how the mind works. this is especially true now, with the emergence of the large language model (LLM).

so when it became so obvious that the government (CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID) would lie so blatantly about health and biology i began a deep dive into the study of biology. and i discovered my computer experience has prepared me to appreciate the biological system that is the human body.

there is more nuance than is portrayed by the popular descriptions of it. the immune system is far, far more than just antibody titers. i consider the lies to be an existential threat to humanity.

transfection is not immunization. thinking that injecting toxic sludge into the deltoid muscle in an attempt to enhance the immune system is simply an illusion.

at least that is how i see it. and the lies continue. the question is: what is the agenda, since this whole shit show is not about health. they know better. hell, even i know better.

when i get high i like to meditation on the pattern integrity i have seen across nature. intelligent designer? just may be.

 

[BudToaster]

the smoking gun ...


As noted by Makis, we’re now seeing the emergence of rapid-growing cancers of the breast, colon, esophagus, kidney, liver, pancreas, bile duct, brain, lung and blood — including exceedingly rare types of cancer.

But that’s not all. These cancers are showing up in young people, many under the age of 30, with no family history of cancer. They’re showing up in pregnant women and young children. Equally odd is the fact that most are Stage 3 or 4 by the time they’re diagnosed, yet symptoms only arose days or weeks ago.

The cancers grow and spread so rapidly, many of these patients die before treatment can even begin. Most of them are also resistant to conventional treatment and don’t respond. "I’ve never seen cancer behave like this," Makis says, and he should know, having diagnosed 20,000 cancer patients in his career so far.

Makis first caught wind of this phenomenon when he started tracking the sudden deaths of Canadian doctors, who had to take the full battery of COVID shots to keep their jobs. Within months, there was a rash of sudden deaths among them, many due to heart attacks and dying in their sleep. But there was also a large group of doctors who developed aggressive cancers.

Makis points out that when you look at Go Fund Me pages asking for donations for cancer treatment, a large portion of these people are in professions that were mandated to take the shots, such as medical professionals and school teachers, police officers, fire fighters, military personnel and airline crews.


the innate immune system which normally controls nacent cancers is wacked by the jab juice. as it is designed to do. why was this done? they knew this would happen. it was in Kariko & Weissman's 2005 paper. the prelude to their recent igNobel award.

 

[BudToaster]

more details about turbo cancer and cause:

Potential Mechanisms of Action​

When asked how the COVID shots might be causing these turbo cancers, Makis describes several possible mechanisms that can lead to cancer in susceptible individuals. The primary one is the modification of the mRNA used.

The COVID shots do not contain the identical mRNA found in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The mRNA has been genetically manipulated in a process called "codon optimization," where pseudouridine is inserted to stabilize the RNA and prevent rapid breakdown.4

The reason codon optimization was used is because it’s difficult to get your body to produce a given protein by injecting mRNA. Not only is it rapidly destroyed, but for the injection to work, they also need higher levels of protein expression than is naturally possible.

They bypassed this problem by making substitutions in the genetic instructions. You can swap out certain nucleotides (three nucleotides make up a codon) and still end up with the same protein in the end, but the increased efficiency comes at a terrible cost.

When substituting parts of the code in this way, the resulting protein can easily get misfolded, and this has been linked to a variety of chronic diseases,5 including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and heart failure.6

As explained by Makis, the pseudouridine insertion can also suppress your innate immune surveillance by dampening the activity of toll-like receptors, and one downstream effect of that is reduced cancer surveillance.


as i said, lots of nuance in the immune system. more proof that you can't trick mother nature.

 

[BudToaster]

more details of biology ...

Other possible mechanisms include:

•Genomic integration of the modified mRNA through reverse transcription, which might disrupt tumor suppressor genes.
•Genomic integration of DNA contaminants in the shots, which might disrupt tumor suppressor genes.
•Tumors may so be promoted by the presence of an SV40 promoter in the DNA contaminants.
•The liposomal nanoparticles (LNPs) spread the mRNA systemically, to all tissues, with severe impacts on your immune function. We now know that some individuals continue to produce spike protein for at least six months, and when your body is repeatedly (let alone continuously) exposed to the same antigen, it creates tolerance.
As a result, you become more prone to infection because your immune system no longer puts up a fight against the antigen. However, the same antibodies that target infections also target cancer cells, so your cancer risk goes up as well.
•Plasmid DNA can also be taken up by gut bacteria, causing them to become a source of constant antigen (spike protein) production.


and a key take away message:


Cancer deaths are also likely to continue going up, because if we don’t know the exact mechanism behind them, we cannot treat them, Makis notes, and both chemo and radiation are proving useless. They don’t work against these rapid-onset cancers.

A key take-home here is that the more mRNA shots you take, the greater the immune system damage, the greater your risk of impaired cancer surveillance and hence, the greater your risk of turbo cancer.

 

[mean mr.mustard]

at least that is how i see it. and the lies continue.

 

[BudToaster]

As reported by Medical Xpress, October 2, 2023:

"Research by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway, suggests that COVID-19 vaccines or the body's response to them can lead to unexpected vaginal bleeding in women. This phenomenon was observed in women across different reproductive stages.

In a paper,11 ‘Unexpected vaginal bleeding and COVID-19 vaccination in nonmenstruating women,’ published in Science Advances, the team of public health researchers detail their findings that raise the possibility that the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is targeted by the vaccines, might be involved in this phenomenon ...

The study included approximately 22,000 participants, aged 32 to 64, from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and the Senior cohort, ages 65 to 80.

Unexpected vaginal bleeding was reported in 3.3% of postmenopausal women, 14.1% of perimenopausal women, and 13.1% of premenopausal women, more than three times the expected rates. Around half of the women who reported unexpected vaginal bleeding experienced it within 28 days after a COVID-19 vaccination."

 

[mean mr.mustard]

Don't you think that people will want evidence beyond your reposting?

Like they might have a look around and realize that there's no evidence beyond the propaganda?

After a while it should soak in.

 

[BudToaster]

evidence? you mean like this:

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway ... The study included approximately 22,000 participants, aged 32 to 64, from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and the Senior cohort, ages 65 to 80.

 

[mean mr.mustard]

You just rereposted.

 

[BudToaster]

or evidence like this:

For anyone who’s shying away from getting a COVID shot because they’re afraid of the side effects, The New York Times has words of comfort: Feeling awful could just mean you’re having a “vigorous immune response.”

A higher heart rate and temperature are also indicative of a stronger antibody response, the Times says. On the other hand, if you’re not having unpleasant side effects, it doesn’t mean the shot’s not working.

To come to their conclusions, researchers worked with 363 vaccinated participants and tracked their antibody production for six days after their shots.

“Those who had seven distinct side effects — including chills, tiredness, feeling unwell and headache — produced nearly double the levels of antibodies as those who reported no symptoms,” the Times said. “And a change in skin temperature of just 1-degree Celsius predicted antibody levels three times higher six months after the second dose.”


antibodies are NOT a correlate of protection - simply an easily derived metric.

 

[BudToaster]

You just rereposted.

as P P Quimby used to say (circa 1860): if it is worth saying, it is worth repeating.

 

[mean mr.mustard]

So what are you doing repeating it?

 

[Roms]

50.5% No and No way ^^

Nobel virologist and biologist

« Les non-injectés sauveront l'humanité » "The unvaxx will save humanity"

 

[Hiddenjems]

excellent analysis, as usual

 

[Hiddenjems]

Old fat guys have been known to beat up on young ripped guys.

 

[unclefishstick]

aw toasty,saddened to hear about your vaginal bleeding,now i understand your weird hobby

 

[audiohi]

Old fat guys have been known to beat up on young ripped guys.

old fat guys crying about back surgery?

 

[BudToaster]

just in case you missed this ... another vaxx bites the dust ...


By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

If it came to forced COVID-19 vaccination against human will, I have said Novavax would be the choice since it gives a limited 5 mcg dose of the potentially lethal Spike protein and has no genetic material. The growing number of fatal side effects with mRNA vaccines and recent news of contamination with SV-40 cDNA has resulted in record low rates of booster uptake, currently at 1.3% of unwary Americans.

Mateo-Urdiales reported on 20,903 individuals who took the two shot primary series of Novavax. Theoretical vaccine effectiveness was shockingly low:

“Adjusted estimated vaccine effectiveness against notified SARS-CoV infections in those with partial vaccination (15 days after the first dose to 14 days after the second dose) was 23%(95%CI, 13%-33%), increasing after full vaccination to 31% (95%CI, 22%-39%). Estimated vaccine effectiveness was higher against symptomatic COVID-19, with an estimate of 31% (95%CI, 16%-44%) in those partially vaccinated and of 50% (95%CI, 40%-58%) in those fully vaccinated.”

If a vaccine cannot safely provide at least 50% protection for a year, it is not viable in my clinical practice. Sadly Novavax failed at both of these outcomes. With low-risk Omicron, and likely substantial natural immunity by Fall of 2022, only 26 infections led to hospitalization during the study period; 1 occurred during the reference period, 7 during partial vaccination, and 18 after full vaccination. No deaths were reported.

In summary, Novavax is probably the safest of all the COVID-19 vaccines because it does not use genetic technology. Sadly, it is useless against Omicron and cannot be recommended for any health benefit.


should be crystal clear by now that vaxx is just a grift.