YouTube under no obligation to host anti-vaccine advocate’s videos, court says
YouTube had the discretion to take down content that harmed users, judge said.
arstechnica.com
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
One of the most common COVID-19 vaccine injury syndromes is dysautonomia characterized by heart palpitations, and fluctuations of heart rate and blood pressure that are inappropriate for the degree of physical activity.
There is great concern that mRNA causes Spike protein production and as a result, some Spike protein is expressed on cell surfaces. This will be true for all mRNA vaccines. It is conceivable that having Spike protein expressed on the surface of endothelial cells, neurons, and adrenal cells could invoke an attack that would cause inappropriate release of three endogenous circulating catecholamines: dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine.
A recent paper by Semmler et al from University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany has shed new light on what is happening to the vaccinated. The mRNA vaccines are indeed driving the production of Spike protein which is on cell surfaces and in the blood circulation. This is stimulating the production of antibodies not only against Spike protein but also against endogenous receptors and cytokines that must be in close proximity to Spike.
and ANY platform should have the right to take down content that harms users...YouTube under no obligation to host anti-vaccine advocate’s videos, court says
YouTube had the discretion to take down content that harmed users, judge said.arstechnica.com
Define “harms”.and ANY platform should have the right to take down content that harms users...
How so? By what measure? Do you have an list of vaccines ordered by their functionality and will you share it (and refs to relevant supporting literature) with us please?First off they are the least functional vaccines we’ve ever made.
By the metric of prevention of infection.How so? By what measure? Do you have a list of vaccines ordered by their functionality and will you share it (and refs to relevant supporting literature) with us please?
so lowering the likelihood of severe illness and/or death does not count in your book? i thought that was the entire point, harm reduction. huh... so, in your book, if you catch it but do not get extremely ill or die, the vaccine failed? just curious...By the metric of prevention of infection.
The original metric before the goalpost was moved several times.
"harm" like "porn", is in the eyes of the viewer...or the platform hosting the dialogue. a Supreme Court Justice once, when asked what "smut" was, replied "i know it when i see it".Define “harms”.
no seriously, can you tell me more about this list and how it is ordered? covid vax are #1, right? what is #2?By the metric of prevention of infection.
The original metric before the goalpost was moved several times.
One simple way is to look at breakthrough case data. I know of no other vaccine higher than 10-15% breakthrough rate. Covid vaccines by any measure are over 30%.no seriously, can you tell me more about this list and how it is ordered? covid vax are #1, right? what is #2?
I don't know how prevention of infection is measured, can you tell me
Yeah, and he was dead wrong. All speech is protected, specifically because speech doesn’t cause harm."harm" like "porn", is in the eyes of the viewer...or the platform hosting the dialogue. a Supreme Court Justice once, when asked what "smut" was, replied "i know it when i see it".
nope. go scream "FIRE!" in a crowded theater and see how fast they arrest you. even "free speech" has limits and potential blowback. if you knowingly tell someone to do something wrong and they kill/injure themselves or others because of your mendacity, you will be arrested and go to jail. lying is NOT protected free speech. interesting that you think your opinion outweighs that of a Supreme Court Justice...Yeah, and he was dead wrong. All speech is protected, specifically because speech doesn’t cause harm.
nope. go scream "FIRE!" in a crowded theater and see how fast they arrest you. even "free speech" has limits and potential blowback. if you knowingly tell someone to do something wrong and they kill/injure themselves or others because of your mendacity, you will be arrested and go to jail. lying is NOT protected free speech. interesting that you think your opinion outweighs that of a Supreme Court Justice...
yeah, that is the rub, ain't it ... can't prove a negative. the expected 200 million world wide death porn was based on a fraudulent simulation model done by a serial fraudster.I don't know how prevention of infection is measured, can you tell me?
now, imagine if you will, this happening in trillions of cellsAbstract:
Codon optimization describes the process used to increase protein
production by use of alternative but synonymous codon changes. In SARS-CoV-2
mRNA vaccines codon optimizations can result in differential secondary
conformations that inevitably affect a protein’s function with significant
consequences to the cell. Importantly, when codon optimization increases the GC
content of synthetic mRNAs, there can be an inevitable enrichment of G-quartets
which potentially form G-quadruplex structures. The emerging G-quadruplexes are
favorable binding sites of RNA binding proteins like helicases that inevitably affect
epigenetic reprogramming of the cell by altering transcription, translation and
replication. In this study, we performed a RNAfold analysis to investigate alterations
in secondary structures of mRNAs in SARS-CoV-2 vaccines due to codon
optimization. We show a significant increase in the GC content of mRNAs in vaccines
as compared to native SARS-CoV-2 RNA sequences encoding the spike protein. As
the GC enrichment leads to more G-quadruplex structure formations, these may
contribute to potential pathological processes initiated by SARS-CoV-2 genetic
vaccination
Conclusions
The argument that the spike proteins synthesized by codon optimized mRNAs are
identical to spike protein from the virus should be cautiously examined. There are
several arguments that challenge this dogma. First, the biodistribution of non-
specific LNP transfection of mRNAs does not discriminate towards ACE2 or CD147
expressing cell lines as seen with the virus. Second, the mRNA that encodes spike
protein is known to be different in several regards. The mRNAs are known to have a
2 Proline substitution (K986P and V987P) (Department of Health and Human
Services Patent US 10,960,070B2) altering the proteins conformation. The mRNAs
are known to be codon optimized thus altering their secondary structure and their
quadruplex G density in the spike protein mRNA. The mRNAs are known to have
N1-methylpseudourine substitutions that alter translation fidelity and Toll Like
Receptor recognition. Additionally, the expression levels and duration of these
mRNAs may be longer and of higher copy number in many tissues that never
experience natural virus infection. In this respect, safety evaluation studies
involving mass spectrometry to identify cryptic expression of synthetic mRNA constructs and
immunoprecipitation studies to locate unfavorable RNA and DNA binding proteins
involved in epi-transcriptomic interference are urgently needed.
Finally, the pharmacokinetics of injection are different than infection. 30ug- 100ug per injection (90ug-300ug for those boosted) of Spike mRNA equates to 13 Trillion to 40 Trillion mRNA molecules injected in a few seconds
with each injection. The pharmacokinetics of this bolus injection differs from that of viral replication that occurs over the course of a few days. If each of these mRNAs can produce 10-100 spike proteins and you have 30-40
Trillion cells, there may be a far greater systemic quantity and a much longer
duration of spike protein exposure through the vaccination route than natural
infection. Boosters given more frequently than a year will lead to total body
accumulation of spike protein and further heighten the risk of disease in organs
such as the brain, heart, bone marrow, and immune cells and tissues. This false
equivalency may lead to an under appreciation of the symptomatology of vaccine
based adverse events.
Dr Claire Taylor
Not good reading about Ba 2.86 (pirola) and also EG 5.1 ( Eris) All vaccine Sera tested showed NO neutralising activity. Monoclonal antibodies didn’t work at all. Literally the tools we have been told to rely on for living with Covid, in the lab, do not appear to work.