What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Have You Been Vaccinated?

Have You Been Vaccinated?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 63 31.3%
  • No!

    Votes: 43 21.4%
  • Soon!

    Votes: 15 7.5%
  • No Way!

    Votes: 66 32.8%
  • I Just Wanna Watch!

    Votes: 14 7.0%

  • Total voters
    201

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
Robert Kogon:
Is a pen name a fake name?

Image result for what is a pen name?


What is a pseudonym or pen name? A pseudonym, also known as a pen name or nom de plume, is a fictitious name that a writer or author uses instead of his or her real name. A pen name is listed as the author's name on a published book, and readers often do not know the real name or identity of the author.

 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
Robert Kogon:
Is a pen name a fake name?

Image result for what is a pen name?


What is a pseudonym or pen name? A pseudonym, also known as a pen name or nom de plume, is a fictitious name that a writer or author uses instead of his or her real name. A pen name is listed as the author's name on a published book, and readers often do not know the real name or identity of the author.


But have you read the article? :rolleyes: :smoker:
 

BudToaster

Well-known member
Veteran
from a much longer substack by Kevin McKernan
Curious Kittens We shouldn't have to do our own Fragment analysis and Sequencing
(he's into cats)
The initial vaccines that targeted Wuhan-1 spike protein have never provided lot to lot DNA sequencing quality control. They have never provided any evidence of transcriptional or translational fidelity of these pro-drugs. This is of utmost importance as the vaccines incorporated an error prone nucleotide known as N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) known to increase the transcriptional error rate to 250-300/Million or 1 error every 4,000 nucleotides (Chen et al). This translates into an error in every vaccine molecule synthesized and 14-34 trillion are injected with Pfizer and Moderna respectively. If the single molecule (Pacific Biosciences sequencing) assays used to estimate this error rate manifest in real human studies, this is an extraordinary degree of complexity.

To make matters even worse, the impact of this base on ribosome fidelity is unknown but the published attempts to model pseudouridines (not N1-methyl-pseudoU or m1Ψ) impact on fidelity have shown substantial increases in ribosomal frame-shifting, stop codon ablation and translational error (Fernandez et al). A study that attempted to unsuccessfully challenge this is discussed here.

Andrew Fire’s lab sequenced the earlier vaccines but failed to ever disclose the raw sequencing reads. These data are needed to address concerns over transcriptional error rates and heteroplasmies.

No public sequence data exists for the novel bivalent vaccines being administered to children. Over 50M of the bivalent vaccines have been administered according to the CDC as of this writing.
so, "probably safe, likely effective" ... anybody still believe this lie?
 

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran

moose eater

Well-known member
Natural immunity just like SARS 1
I'd read previously that best protections came from being both vaccinated AND having had COVID, but that the immunity in any case was limited over time.
 

entropical

Active member
Veteran
I'd read previously that best protections came from being both vaccinated AND having had COVID, but that the immunity in any case was limited over time.
The mammonists behind it will tell you anything to make a buck.

”Conclusion: Adults with moderate or severe previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to have a health event sufficient to impact routine activities or require medical assessment in the week following each vaccine doses.”

 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top