Have You Been Vaccinated?

[BudToaster]

stumbled onto FiercePharma :

Patients are “likely” to need a third dose of Pfizer and BioNTech’s shot once the period of initial protection wanes, CEO Albert Bourla said in a recent interview with CVS Health Live. The comments came shortly after Pfizer posted data showing Comirnaty was 91.3% effective against symptomatic COVID-19 for up to six months in patients who'd received their second dose.

While protection remains high for those six months, it does “go down by time,” Bourla said, adding that the data stressed a “need” for re-vaccinations. He said it was currently unclear when and how frequently boosters might be required. “There will be likely a need for a third dose somewhere between six and 12 months, and then from there, there will be an annual re-vaccination.”

In a Monday note to clients, Bernstein analyst Ronny Gal wrote that his team is "not sure [Pfizer] will be right longer-term," but that the company is "making a killing now." The team projects $36 billion from the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine this year, a revenue figure that would blow away all other records in pharma history.

Pfizer has not been shy about potentially raising prices as the pandemic evolves, either. After the crisis shifts from a pandemic response to endemic virus containment, Pfizer is "going to get more on price," CFO Frank D'Amelio has said.

a little preselling is a sign of a great marketer, eh? what i used to do as a computer consultant - give 'em a taste for what's possible.

uh oh, does this mean the fucking "vaccine" doesn't work? sure hope they figured out and solved the pesky "LNP toxicity with multiple injections" problem.

 

[Doctor M]

Immediate Use of Ivermectin Medicine Globally Can End COVID-19 Pandemic: Scientists

​​​​​​https://weather.com/en-IN/india/coro...id-19-pandemic



​​​​​​
CDC grossly exaggerating outdoor transmission rate: COVID-19 experts
https://nypost.com/2021/05/11/cdc-ex...id-19-experts/


​​​​​​Biden HHS Redefines Sex as Non-Biological in New ‘Anti-Discrimination’ Rule Change
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/...le-change/?amp


Anti Science idiots at CDC and HHS are a fuckin embarrassment.


In 1976 the mass immunization of Americans for the swine flu was stopped after 50 deaths...

​​​​​​From 14 December 2020 through 3 May 2021, the CDC's VAERS database received 4,178 reports of death among people in the US who received a COVID-19 'vaccine.'

The level of current "vaccine" propaganda would make the Nazi's blush. It works so well cannabis growers and medical users suddenly love big pharma, how Orwellian. But the irony doesn't stop there. The same folks who breathlessly went on about how horrible Trump was/is trust experimental covid shots he rushed through.

Now for the funny part... The largest % of people who will not take the covid shot are Trump voters/Conservatives/Republicans.... You know the folks who liberals called Trump cultist.



MEANWHILE the evidence keeps piling up that the covid shot is as useless as tits on a bull..

 

[Doctor M]

stumbled onto FiercePharma :



a little preselling is a sign of a great marketer, eh? what i used to do as a computer consultant - give 'em a taste for what's possible.

uh oh, does this mean the fucking "vaccine" doesn't work? sure hope they figured out and solved the pesky "LNP toxicity with multiple injections" problem.

The short answer based on the number of fully "vaccinated" people getting Covid is no. Of the thousands of "vaccinated" people who contracted Covid hundreds have died. So there goes that bullshit line about the covid shot lessening the severity.

Wait until the fall when these 'vaccinated" people are challenged by coronaviruses. They will use it as reason to convince the same morons of the need for a "booster" shot or the 2nd generation covid shots.



The Second-Generation COVID Vaccines Are Coming

​​​​​​https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...es-are-coming/

Second-generation COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial starts

​​​​​​https://newsroom.uw.edu/news/second-...l-trial-starts



Only an idiot would allow there Children to get a covid shot.

Source CDC:

CDC's quiet admission last year that of all US deaths attributed to COVID-19, only 6% had the coronavirus listed as the sole cause of death. In the remaining 94% of deaths ascribed to COVID-19, there were on average 2.9 additional conditions or causes of death.

6% of 561,594 covid deaths = 33,695 deaths Same as a normal flu season which magically seems to have vanished.

 

[mexcurandero420]

 

[mexcurandero420]

VID-19 Vaccine Coverup

Vaccine dangers hiding in plain sight


FACT: There has been a massive increase in deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) this year. That’s not a ‘conspiracy theory’, that’s an indisputable fact. You can try to explain it or justify it, or even argue it doesn’t matter, but you can’t deny it.

We’re not talking about a modest increase in death reports, something we might chat about in concerned voices over Chai tea and bagels at a company mixer. We’re talking about a huge and unprecedented increase—so massive that in the last 4 months alone, VAERS has received over 40% of all death reports it has ever received in its entire 30+year history. So massive it’s literally “off the chart.” The first chart in the pair below shows VAERS death reports from 2014 thru 2020. If you tried to add the 2021 data to it, it would be way, way off the chart. The second chart shows how much detail was lost when the 2021 data was squeezed in.

The pair of charts below are another illustration. Notice all age groups had an increase in death reports from the COVID-19 vaccines—with both the 18-64 and 65+ age groups experiencing a dramatic “off the chart” increase.

The increase in VAERS death reports is not due to more vaccination


Even with the COVID-19 shots, the estimated total vaccines administered so far this year is less than the yearly average--because we are only a quarter of the way through this year. No doubt the vaccine count will climb much higher by the end of this year, but it’s not the reason for the massive increase in VAERS death reports over the last 4 months.

The following chart compares estimates of vaccines administered with deaths reported to VAERS, separating COVID-19 vaccines from other vaccines. The rate of reported deaths for other vaccines looks fairly normal; the massive increase is mainly from the COVID-19 vaccines.

There are many notes at the end of this paper about how the vaccine data was estimated, and where the data for these charts was obtained, along with the data table.
What the official experts have to say (*crickets*)


With all the many experts at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ostensibly dedicated to COVID-19 and vaccine safety, not a single one has attempted to explain or analyze, or has even mentioned, the massive increase in deaths reported to VAERS from the COVID-19 shots. The silence is telling.

But it’s not as if VAERS death reports are being hidden, exactly. VAERS data is freely available to the public…and if you don’t want to look it up, you can follow the CDC’s COVID-19 Vaccine Death Count online, which is updated regularly. Just scroll down to the section called “Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination” for the latest numbers. Most recently, the death count went from 2794 on April 5, to 3005 on April 12, to 3848 on April 26. But a mere 1054 deaths in 21 days is no problem for the CDC—it probably just means the vaccines are working.

I found only one paper (1) that mentioned VAERS death reports re COVID-19 vaccines. The lead author was Julianne Gee, from the CDC’s COVID-19 Response Team, and the paper concerned safety monitoring during the first month (December 14 to January 13). We are told, in the Summary:

“Monitoring … indicates reassuring safety profiles for COVID-19 vaccines. … No unusual or unexpected reporting patterns were detected.”

The authors said 113 deaths were reported to VAERS that month from the COVID-19 vaccines. Incredibly, they never compared that number to historical VAERS averages or trends…just kidding. Of course they compared it, realized it was shockingly higher than the historical average of 12 deaths per month, and decided not to mention it. Never let science interfere with good vaccine marketing.

Bizarrely, the authors actually implied the number of VAERS death reports indicated a safe vaccine, because a lot fewer deaths were reported to VAERS than they would have expected to see coincidentally among people who got the vaccine. Do you think that makes sense? I hope you said “no,” because it does not make sense. You can’t conclude a vaccine is safe because fewer people filed VAERS death reports than were expected to die coincidentally. I can’t even explain it in a way that makes sense—because it’s NONSENSE.
They were going to die anyway…someday


One hypothesis I’ve heard, and which is hinted at by Gee, et.al. in the paper above, is that the elderly and infirm, many in long-term care facilities, were the first to be targeted by the COVID-19 vaccine campaign, and they are much more likely to die coincidentally. These coincidental deaths then lead to an increase in suspected vaccine-induced deaths reported to VAERS. (*cough*)

VAERS data just does not support that hypothesis. First, because all age groups—not just seniors—had a dramatic increase in VAERS death reports from COVID-19 vaccines, as illustrated in the charts below. The red line represents reported COVID-19 vaccine deaths, and the green line represents other vaccines. Across the board, all age groups experienced a dramatic increase in deaths reported to VAERS from the COVID-19 shots—even the under 18 group, which has had very few COVID-19 shots (so far).

Second, the increase in death reports in the 65+ age group is just so massive that coincidental death, no matter how sickly the population, just doesn’t seem like a sufficient and plausible explanation. After all, the elderly and infirm in long-term care facilities are frequent targets of flu shot campaigns.
What does VAERS, and the people who tend to it, do all day?


VAERS is a “hypothesis generating system” that “identifies potential vaccine safety concerns that can be studied in more robust data systems.” VAERS uses data mining to “…identify disproportional adverse event reporting for vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccine.” VAERS also “identifies… adverse event-vaccine pairs reported at least twice as frequently as expected for a COVID-19 vaccine…” (2) (Pages 12-15)

Given the massive increase in deaths reported to VAERS—not a modest increase, but an enormous, unprecedented increase—it’s unfathomable that VAERS would not detect “disproportional” reporting, thus putting the wheels in motion to study the situation “in more robust data systems.” But there is no indication anything like that has occurred.

According to the CDC:

“VAERS has not detected patterns in cause of death that would indicate a safety problem with COVID-19 vaccines.”

Even as the death reports continue to roll in at an astonishing rate, by the dozens and sometimes hundreds per week, in true Orwellian fashion, the CDC simply updates the Death Count on its website and reiterates:

“VAERS has not detected patterns in cause of death that would indicate a safety problem with COVID-19 vaccines.”

And, of course, the old standby reassurance:

“COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.”

The only way it seems possible that VAERS did not detect any safety concerns, is if VAERS was actually programmed to expect a very high rate of deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines—much higher than the rate of deaths expected for other vaccines. That would explain why VAERS did not detect any “adverse event-vaccine pairs reported at least twice as frequently as expected for a COVID-19 vaccine…”

On the other hand, maybe people are just lying, and VAERS is either doing nothing at all, or something other than what we’re being told; or, it is detecting possible safety concerns with the COVID-19 vaccines like crazy, and it’s being covered up.

But, hey—never let it be said I don’t have an open mind. Maybe one of the many highly paid and respected experts at the CDC will do an analysis—like my humble analysis here, but bigger and fancier with more bells and whistles, because they are experts—and prove the massive increase in VAERS death reports has nothing to do with dangerous COVID-19 vaccines. But I won’t be holding my breath. I think if that could be done, it would have been done already—in triplicate.
***


NOTES:

1. Gee J, Marquez P, Su J, et al. First Month of COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Monitoring — United States, December 14, 2020–January 13, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:283–288. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7008e3

2. COVID-19 vaccine safety update, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) January 27, 2021, Tom Shimabukuro, MD, MPH, MBACDC COVID-19 Vaccine Task Force Vaccine Safety Team

3. Search VAERS data: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

4. There were a lot of “unknown age” VAERS death reports—sometimes dozens or even hundreds per year. Therefore, 1/3 of the unknown age reports were added to each of the 3 age groups of 0-17, 18-64 and 65+.

5. US Census Bureau data was used for the years 2014-2020. For 2021, the 2020 population estimates were used.

6. 2014: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table...ST1Y2014.S0101

7. 2015: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table...ST1Y2015.S0101

8. 2016: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table...ST1Y2016.S0101

9. 2017: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table...ST1Y2017.S0101

10. 2018: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table...ST1Y2018.S0101

11. 2019: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table...ST1Y2019.S0101

12. 2020: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2...is-tables.html

13. Age data was consolidated into 3 uniform groups of Age 0-17, Age 18-64 & Age 65+. The Census Bureau uses a 0-19 age range, and no adjustments were made for that.

14. The CDC's estimated rate of flu vaccination for 2010-2020 was used to estimate the rate of all vaccinations. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/c...0estimates.htm

15. % vaccinated in each age group for flu was used to estimate the rate of vaccination per the CDC's vaccine schedule for non-COVID-19 vaccines.

16. Minimum recommended vaccines for each age group were divided among the years in the age group to estimate yearly vaccine consumption:

17. Age 0-17: 18 flu shots + 35 other shots = 53 / 18 = 2.94 per year.

18. Age 18-64: 45 yrs, 45 flu shots + 12 more recommended for everyone (18 more for some) = 45 + 12 = 57 / 45 = 1.24 per year.

19. Age 65+: 15 yrs: 15 flu shots + 5 more recommended for all (18 more recommended for some) = 15 + 5 = 20 / 15= 1.33 per year.

20. CDC’s child and adolescent vaccine schedule: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedul...dolescent.html

21. CDC’s adult vaccine schedule: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedul...imz/adult.html

22. For COVID-19 vaccines I used the total # administered in each age group and estimated 5% were given in 2020 and 95% were given in 2021. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tra...on-demographic

 

[mexcurandero420]

More vaccine dangers, young woman with neurological problems after a jab.

 

[gaiusmarius]

i have to say, i have my doubts about trusting this vaccine, but i also had doubts about my doubts, like a little voice saying, you might end up looking foolish by following your instinct about not trusting this covid vaccine yet. but when i see those charts of the adverse effects increase, it's fucking crazy! how is that not main stream news?

 

[igrowone]

with the boots on the ground as someone vaccinated
haven't known of 1 serious reaction(or covid) from 20 or so vaccinated
know smaller number of unvaccinated, less than 10
their results are 1 hospitalized with covid, the unvaccinated stopped talking to the vaccinated after that
so it could be worse for them then what I've heard, pretty sure they're still alive

 

[flylowgethigh]

<when i see those charts of the adverse effects increase, it's fucking crazy! how is that not main stream news?>

Because the facist corporate owned main stream media is part of the conspiracy. They want you dead or at least dependent on the .guv (them) for your very existence..

No need to take their jab for this BS.

 

[Hombre del mont]

you might end up looking foolish by following your instinct

Always follow your instincts. IMHO, we have, like animals, a sixth sense and instinct is part of this. Sadly, for most us, our ability to connect with our sixth sense is lost. Modern life, i believe is a lot to blame for this. Meditation, Tai Chi, Yoga, and reconnecting with the Earth can all help with restoring our abilities to know instinctively what is good for us. But hey, don't listen to me, Trust your instinct!.

 

[gaiusmarius]

with the boots on the ground as someone vaccinated
haven't known of 1 serious reaction(or covid) from 20 or so vaccinated
know smaller number of unvaccinated number, less than 10
their results are 1 hospitalized with covid, the unvaccinated stopped talking to the vaccinated after that
so it could be worse for them then what I've heard, pretty sure they're still alive

so no body in your family is refusing it? what if your partner was against getting it? would you split from them? stop talking? seems really harsh way to look at human relation ships. but each to his own i guess.

 

[igrowone]

so no body in your family is refusing it? what if your partner was against getting it? would you split from them? stop talking? seems really harsh way to look at human relation ships. but each to his own i guess.

there are family divides on this, just adds to the complications
just more of a report of what I see
and what I see is the unvaccinated seem to have more troubles health wise
and in this case it was the no-vaxxers that refused to talk to the vaxxers anymore
I see them as having mental issues too

 

[Hombre del mont]

If your interested in reading about side effects reported in the UK to the MRHA (yellow card reporting system), you can follow the link below. There you will find an interactive tool that allows you to search the UK Govenmets own data on reported side effects. The tool enables you to search using many different criteria, something the Govenmets own site does not. You can cross check it to the MHRA site if you so wish.

https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports

 

[flylowgethigh]

Pastor in alberta CA, arrested on the fuckin interstate HWY, about to be released. what did he do? Defied the local nazi .guv and held church assembly. Fuckin cops will say they were just following orders.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jnco9rPEEI

So now the facist corporate radio is talking about concerts starting up again - if you are vaxed and have that CoVID passport. I like how young women are waking up to the sterility, and how that can catch problems from screwing a jabbed guy. I may need to rent myself out as a non-jabbed stud.

 

[mexcurandero420]

with the boots on the ground as someone vaccinated
haven't known of 1 serious reaction(or covid) from 20 or so vaccinated
know smaller number of unvaccinated, less than 10
their results are 1 hospitalized with covid, the unvaccinated stopped talking to the vaccinated after that
so it could be worse for them then what I've heard, pretty sure they're still alive

At what age are those people, you're talking about?

 

[igrowone]

At what age are those people, you're talking about?

from the 20s to the 80s
more old than young, plenty of them with conditions that aren't a good mix with covid

 

[Absolem]

Not a coincidence all the people pushing vaccine misinformation are the same ones on here who pushed all the election fraud claims that got bitch smacked in the courts.

 

[unclefishstick]

Not a coincidence all the people pushing vaccine misinformation are the same ones on here who pushed all the election fraud claims that got bitch smacked in the courts.

screaming about main stream media while a social media algorithm is buggering them from behind...

 

[mexcurandero420]

 

[gaiusmarius]

ill be glad to be laughed at about this. it would mean this vaccine works and is safe long term. i pray it is so. just out of interest, did anyone check the numbers on adverse vaccine effects compared to before? or we just calling that bs on principle i wonder?

oh yes, feel free to provide the correct data about the subjects being discussed, you know, liberate people from the algorithm hole or what ever you call the information bubble. please free me from it with the true data. i know its more fun to ridicule, but if you have all the answers, lets have em.