Hi Mr. Roseberry,
I wouldn't worry or second guess your decisions about your current ace seeds or purchasing golden tiger.
To my knowledge, and I have frequented the ace forums for quite along time, none of the accusations made have any truth.
Golden tiger genetics have not been crossed with Vietnamese and whatever else was said. They have just been inbred more generations. I have grown first release of fems and current stock. Both great, thai leaning phenos easily found in both. same deal with malawi as well, have grown old regs, old fems, and new fems. Not much changed there either. Their is a a bit less variation in current versions, for the better in my opinion, I suppose that some may have wanted the variation though. And still enough variation to please those looking for phenos leaning to either side.
I can't speak from experience, but i believe it would be the same with bangi haze, it seems illogical to cross it to an indica when it is already extremely fast flowering. No genetic change, Dubi simply feels calling it a 60/40 hybrid is more accurate, he has stated this.
I do however agree with that poster on zamaldelica. I don't think back cross to malawi to be the best move, but i havn't grown either fems or regs of zamaldelica. I believe there are a few variations in genetic make up of current zamaldelica regs, not just malawi back cross. Fem zamaldelica is still zamal x golden tiger, yet again just inbred.
Anyhow, sorry for long off topic post everyone, i just didn't want those who seen the posts turned off Ace for untruthful claims.
Have a good one everybody!
I wouldn't worry or second guess your decisions about your current ace seeds or purchasing golden tiger.
To my knowledge, and I have frequented the ace forums for quite along time, none of the accusations made have any truth.
Golden tiger genetics have not been crossed with Vietnamese and whatever else was said. They have just been inbred more generations. I have grown first release of fems and current stock. Both great, thai leaning phenos easily found in both. same deal with malawi as well, have grown old regs, old fems, and new fems. Not much changed there either. Their is a a bit less variation in current versions, for the better in my opinion, I suppose that some may have wanted the variation though. And still enough variation to please those looking for phenos leaning to either side.
I can't speak from experience, but i believe it would be the same with bangi haze, it seems illogical to cross it to an indica when it is already extremely fast flowering. No genetic change, Dubi simply feels calling it a 60/40 hybrid is more accurate, he has stated this.
I do however agree with that poster on zamaldelica. I don't think back cross to malawi to be the best move, but i havn't grown either fems or regs of zamaldelica. I believe there are a few variations in genetic make up of current zamaldelica regs, not just malawi back cross. Fem zamaldelica is still zamal x golden tiger, yet again just inbred.
Anyhow, sorry for long off topic post everyone, i just didn't want those who seen the posts turned off Ace for untruthful claims.
Have a good one everybody!