Yes I am. In fact they're probably more ideal as a veg light.
Ive got a room with some Samsung boards, and se 1000w hps. I place 3 strips of samsungs per 4x4, at 190w a unit from the wall, so 570w, and measured par at 30" from lights, and got 700 umol. On the se 1000w hps in a umbrella hood, i got 700 umol. I need to throw the par meter 30" under my cmh and compare. But im really impressed with cmh and led compared to hps. Both keep stretch down. Id say the cmh produces more resins, but ive got more runs under my belt with those compared to led. Ive got a seed run going under the led and hps room, and its crazy to see the same varieties stretching to the moon under the hps, while the same siblings under led are all shorter, more dense, and more structurally appealing and beautiful.
I think multiple bars are probably the most efficient setup. That's why I like the spyder type designs. More even coverage.
Most of the quantum board setups I see imo will have the same flaws, to a lesser extent, as hid's. Mainly that it's more of a centralized light source. The great thing about these shop lights is that I can put a plant anywhere under them and I know it's getting great coverage.
Owning both an HLG 600 watt panel and a couple of COB rigs, I'm inclined to agree with you regarding coverage area.
I've been toying with the idea of adding individual COBs in my tent to add to the HLG panel to get some better light around the perimeter.
Ive got a room with some Samsung boards, and se 1000w hps. I place 3 strips of samsungs per 4x4, at 190w a unit from the wall, so 570w, and measured par at 30" from lights, and got 700 umol. On the se 1000w hps in a umbrella hood, i got 700 umol. I need to throw the par meter 30" under my cmh and compare. But im really impressed with cmh and led compared to hps. Both keep stretch down. Id say the cmh produces more resins, but ive got more runs under my belt with those compared to led. Ive got a seed run going under the led and hps room, and its crazy to see the same varieties stretching to the moon under the hps, while the same siblings under led are all shorter, more dense, and more structurally appealing and beautiful.
Yes to the point it causes stress to the plant/s directly underneath it. To combat this, I've raised the lights as high as they can go in my tent - ~6" from the roof and 32" above my top screen. This is only my second grow under them though, so take everything with a grain of salt, if you will.Nice to hear some confirmation.
Do you find it overly intense directly under the lights? That's my only question regarding the 320w quantum boards and whether it might be better to just pony up and go with a multi bar setup.
A par meter would be nice to have!
I'm really happy with my COBs. I have 2 rigs of 12, spread out out over a 2 42" squares to cover a 4x8 footprint very nicely.definitely can see the benefit of multiple strips verse one centralized cob area. firm believer of distributing that wattage/ppfd/par whatever out over a wider area. i always used to say i'd rather run 3 600's se then 2 1000's se. maybe i should rethink the next cob purchase an go with strips instead.
That's not a fast plant, THIS is a fast plant!
Orange Kush - 42 days
View Image
View ImageView ImageView ImageView Image
She's a clone only, usually done around 8 weeks. Seriously delicious orange sherbert type smell.
Even though she has a nice fade, I'm not taking her down till I get closer to her normal harvest window. 6 weeks is way too early for any plant imo and looking at the lower buds I can see she still could use another week at least.
Not sure why but several plants are looking ripe earlier than usual this round. Only thing that's changed is I've increased light intensity. Usually if something finishes early I think it's stress related but these girls look pretty happy so who knows. Certainly not complaining though!