What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Covid is a accidental Lab leaked bioweapon

GOT_BUD?

Weed is a gateway to gardening
ICMag Donor
Veteran
He's probably confident enough now that he has the evidence buried to where he thinks it can't be traced back to him.
 

mowood3479

Active member
Veteran
I know China is very strict on how many kids people can have, preferably more boys than girls for some reason if I remember correctly. Perhaps this virus was ment to be some form of population control? The virus has a very low death rate though which makes me lean more towards an accident.

Chinas population is dropping and is about to hit a cliff... they have relaxed most of their 1 child rules and are actually promoting more births currently...
The ccp sucks but I don’t think they want to wipe out their own people... (although idk just speculating)
 

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
January 15, 2020 - The following occured:

1. Trump meets Xi Jin Ping in China and signs Phase 1 of the new China - US Trade Deal (A move against China)
2. First US case of COVID-19 enters the US (US 'patient zero') from Wuhan, China and goes straight to a nursing home in Seattle, WA (Counter-move)
3. Nancy Pelosi hands impeachment articles (against Donald Trump) to Senate (after waiting several days)

It was not an accidental leak. Biowarfare is illegal and thus cannot be admitted to or acknowledged.

Remember all the propaganda about bat soup and pangolins at the Wuhan "wet market?"
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
well well well, i see Zuckerberg and his monopoly are starting to allow posts saying covid might be man made, ROFLMFAO. they were fact checking and banning everyone for any doubts about the official narative and now we see them making a complete about turn. if this doesn't make you understand that their fact checkers are just humans with biases who are no smarter then your average idiot. in fact they are even too dumb to understand probabilities and put facts together when they have them right in front of them. but when his highness covid pope Fauci, another flawed and probably corrupt human makes a u turn, they all follow along like a bunch of baby ducks. we are so fucked if we don't strip them of the power to decide what you can say and whats true and whats not. we lost over a year to investigate the truth because social media monopolies all conspired to invent a truth and force it down our throats.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
is it just me, or all the natural origin fans suddenly eerily silent? what happened to; "follow the science? the science says its natural? scientific consensus is that its just all a big Natural coincidence." well all those so called scientists shills, shaming, silencing and banning people, can eat some dick now, ill even salt it for them. lmao. lets hope the Vaccine isn't found to be based on the same kind of science.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
12,184 DEAD 1,196,190 Injuries: European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 “Vaccines”
  • May 26, 2021


May 25, 2021

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.”
Here is what EudraVigilance states about their database:
This website was launched by the European Medicines Agency in 2012 to provide public access to reports of suspected side effects (also known as suspected adverse drug reactions). These reports are submitted electronically to EudraVigilance by national medicines regulatory authorities and by pharmaceutical companies that hold marketing authorisations (licences) for the medicines.
EudraVigilance is a system designed for collecting reports of suspected side effects. These reports are used for evaluating the benefits and risks of medicines during their development and monitoring their safety following their authorisation in the European Economic Area (EEA). EudraVigilance has been in use since December 2001.
This website was launched to comply with the EudraVigilance Access Policy, which was developed to improve public health by supporting the monitoring of the safety of medicines and to increase transparency for stakeholders, including the general public.
The Management Board of the European Medicines Agency first approved the EudraVigilance Access Policy in December 2010. A revision was adopted by the Board in December 2015 based on the 2010 pharmacovigilance legislation. The policy aims to provide stakeholders such as national medicines regulatory authorities in the EEA, the European Commission, healthcare professionals, patients and consumers, as well as the pharmaceutical industry and research organisations, with access to reports on suspected side effects.
Transparency is a key guiding principle of the Agency, and is pivotal to building trust and confidence in the regulatory process. By increasing transparency, the Agency is better able to address the growing need among stakeholders, including the general public, for access to information. (Source.)​
Their report through May 22, 2021 lists 12,184 deaths and 1,196,190 injuries following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:
From the total of injuries recorded, there are 604,744 serious injuries which equals over 50%.
Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. This subscriber has volunteered to do this, and it is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.
Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*
Here is the summary data through May 22, 2021.
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccineTozinameran (code BNT162b2,Comirnaty) from BioNTech/ Pfizer: 5,961 deaths and 452,779 injuries to 22/05/2021
  • 13,531 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 59 deaths
  • 9,828 Cardiac disorders incl. 735 deaths
  • 71 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 4 deaths
  • 5,468 Ear and labyrinth disorders incl. 3 deaths
  • 183 Endocrine disorders
  • 6,266 Eye disorders incl. 14 deaths
  • 41,214 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 216 deaths
  • 128,031 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,909 deaths
  • 327 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 27 deaths
  • 4,802 Immune system disorders incl. 31 deaths
  • 13,948 Infections and infestations incl. 648 deaths
  • 4,821 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 81 deaths
  • 10,374 Investigations incl. 221 deaths
  • 3,354 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 120 deaths
  • 65,326 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 71 deaths
  • 250 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 15 deaths
  • 81,748 Nervous system disorders incl. 616 deaths
  • 279 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 7 deaths
  • 88 Product issues
  • 7,978 Psychiatric disorders incl. 94 deaths
  • 1,342 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 93 deaths
  • 1,570 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 3 deaths
  • 18,597 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 697 deaths
  • 21,101 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 53 deaths
  • 663 Social circumstances incl. 9 deaths
  • 160 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 10 deaths
  • 11,459 Vascular disorders incl. 225 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273(CX-024414) from Moderna: 3,365 deaths and 72,596 injuries to 22/05/2021
  • 1,335 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 22 deaths
  • 2,045 Cardiac disorders incl. 370 deaths
  • 12 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 718 Ear and labyrinth disorders
  • 37 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
  • 997 Eye disorders incl. 4 deaths
  • 6,305 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 108 deaths
  • 20,774 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 1,480 deaths
  • 129 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 8 deaths
  • 691 Immune system disorders incl. 4 deaths
  • 2,392 Infections and infestations incl. 183 deaths
  • 1,292 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 63 deaths
  • 1,743 Investigations incl. 77 deaths
  • 816 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 64 deaths
  • 9,149 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 62 deaths
  • 77 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 11 deaths
  • 12,314 Nervous system disorders incl. 339 deaths
  • 83 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
  • 11 Product issues
  • 1,375 Psychiatric disorders incl. 51 deaths
  • 468 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 40 deaths
  • 175 Reproductive system and breast disorders incl. 1 death
  • 3,513 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 306 deaths
  • 3,726 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 23 deaths
  • 259 Social circumstances incl. 9 deaths
  • 235 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 26 deaths
  • 1,925 Vascular disorders
Total reactions for the experimental vaccine AZD1222/VAXZEVRIA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19) from Oxford/AstraZeneca: 2,489 deaths and 655,534 injuries to 22/05/2021
  • 7,200 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 100 deaths
  • 9,748 Cardiac disorders incl. 311 deaths
  • 103 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 6,740 Ear and labyrinth disorders
  • 217 Endocrine disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 10,591 Eye disorders incl. 8 deaths
  • 69,826 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 116 deaths
  • 178,037 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 685 deaths
  • 396 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 20 deaths
  • 2,409 Immune system disorders incl. 9 deaths
  • 13,832 Infections and infestations incl. 163 deaths
  • 5,870 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 46 deaths
  • 13,474 Investigations incl. 50 deaths
  • 8,405 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 35 deaths
  • 104,075 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 25 deaths
  • 222 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) incl. 6 deaths
  • 141,437 Nervous system disorders incl. 388 deaths
  • 156 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions incl. 3 deaths
  • 76 Product issues
  • 12,272 Psychiatric disorders incl. 21 deaths
  • 2,264 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 20 deaths
  • 3,327 Reproductive system and breast disorders
  • 21,237 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 278 deaths
  • 29,750 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 14 deaths
  • 582 Social circumstances incl. 4 deaths
  • 498 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 15 deaths
  • 12,790 Vascular disorders incl. 168 deaths
Total reactions for the experimental COVID-19 vaccine JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S) from Johnson & Johnson: 369 deaths and 15,281 injuries to 22/05/2021
  • 145 Blood and lymphatic system disorders incl. 10 deaths
  • 264 Cardiac disorders incl. 34 deaths
  • 8 Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
  • 77 Ear and labyrinth disorders
  • 5 Endocrine disorders incl. 1 death
  • 191 Eye disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 1,302 Gastrointestinal disorders incl. 11 deaths
  • 3,619 General disorders and administration site conditions incl. 97 deaths
  • 38 Hepatobiliary disorders incl. 2 deaths
  • 51 Immune system disorders
  • 245 Infections and infestations incl. 8 deaths
  • 209 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications incl. 6 deaths
  • 1,134 Investigations incl. 23 deaths
  • 104 Metabolism and nutrition disorders incl. 10 deaths
  • 2,368 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders incl. 12 deaths
  • 12 Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
  • 3,051 Nervous system disorders incl. 48 death
  • 7 Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
  • 8 Product issues
  • 181 Psychiatric disorders incl. 3 deaths
  • 69 Renal and urinary disorders incl. 4 deaths
  • 62 Reproductive system and breast disorders
  • 637 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders incl. 29 deaths
  • 324 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders incl. 1 death
  • 39 Social circumstances incl. 2 deaths
  • 214 Surgical and medical procedures incl. 20 deaths
  • 917 Vascular disorders incl. 46 deaths
Summary-May-22.jpg

*These totals are estimates based on reports submitted to EudraVigilance. Totals may be much higher based on percentage of adverse reactions that are reported. Some of these reports may also be reported to the individual country’s adverse reaction databases, such as the U.S. VAERS database, and the UK Yellow Card system. The fatalities are grouped by symptoms, and some fatalities may have resulted from multiple symptoms.

https://conservativechoicecampaign....adverse-drug-reactions-for-covid-19-vaccines/
 

St. Phatty

Active member
is it just me, or all the natural origin fans suddenly eerily silent? what happened to; "follow the science? the science says its natural? scientific consensus is that its just all a big Natural coincidence." well all those so called scientists shills, shaming, silencing and banning people, can eat some dick now, ill even salt it for them. lmao. lets hope the Vaccine isn't found to be based on the same kind of science.

it's not a vaccine. Not by the conventional definition.

It's a medical experiment CALLED a vaccine.
 

Chi13

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
is it just me, or all the natural origin fans suddenly eerily silent? what happened to; "follow the science? the science says its natural? scientific consensus is that its just all a big Natural coincidence." well all those so called scientists shills, shaming, silencing and banning people, can eat some dick now, ill even salt it for them. lmao. lets hope the Vaccine isn't found to be based on the same kind of science.
Maybe they went the way of all the members on here who's only reason for joining ICMag was to troll about Trump?
Last I heard was that the US intelligence agencies were divided on the origins of the virus and Biden was asking for an intelligence report.
I am happy to follow available science and will accept it IF it changes. Currently the only evidence has been the WHO excursion, which I think concluded that it was likely natural, but did not discount the possiblility of a leak.
Many experts are still saying that this occured naturally, including the majority of US intelligence, which is being reported as divided on the topic. I think I heard yesterday it was roughly 2/3 in favour of natural occurence but I could be wrong.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/biden-...hin-90-days/#x

Happy to eat a dick sandwich IF they find proof. I am also happy to follow science, as has been my view all along, rather than jump on any crackpot theory as soon as it sprouts up. I guess if you embrace every single conspiracy eventually you will be right about one. Lets wait and see. Bit too early for eating dick.

Can I ask though, whatever the US report comes out in favour of, would you accept that? It's just that you seem hell bent on only accepting alternative media, so I wonder if CNN report it will you believe it? Will you believe a Biden administration report in main stream media or is that just "fake".
 
Last edited:

jwm

Well-known member
Veteran
YES!!! They, the Chinese were looking for the next bio-weapon. It was designed to attack the lungs. What possible function would a virus like this serve, Other than as a weapon? Answer, none.
 

Chi13

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
YES!!! They, the Chinese were looking for the next bio-weapon. It was designed to attack the lungs. What possible function would a virus like this serve, Other than as a weapon? Answer, none.

A virus functions to replicate itself. There have been natural viruses and transmissible illness throughout history, long before labs, or China. Many natural viruses cross from animals to humans. Swine flu is a recent example.

If it is a biological weapon it is a big fail. It mostly is harmful to the elderly and frail. Surely a biological weapon would target young and healthy, of a fighting age.
 
Last edited:

BudToaster

Well-known member
Veteran
number of vaccines distributed: pfizer is 7 times moderna / pfizer is 3 times Astrazenica / pfizer is 30 times Jannsen

which makes Astrazenica a most nasty jab. Jannsen (J&J) least nasty of the four.
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
Dr. Fauci Admits To Funding Bat Virus Research At Wuhan Lab, Says NIH Funneled $600K Over 5 Years

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 8:48 AM PT – Wednesday, May 26, 2021



While appearing before a congressional budget committee, Dr. Anthony Fauci revealed and defended what he called the “modest” and “very respectful” funding of an infamous Wuhan laboratory. In a house testimony Tuesday, he admitted that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funneled U.S. taxpayer money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci said at least $600,000 was sent to the lab through the non-profit called EcoHealth Alliance. The NIH director confirmed the money was given to the Chinese lab over a five-year period to study bat coronaviruses and whether they could infect humans.

“Well the underlying reason for that is that we had a big scare with SARS-CoV-1 back in 2001-2003, where that particular virus unquestionably went from a bat to an intermediate host to start and epidemic, a pandemic, that resulted in 8,000 cases and close to 800 deaths,” he stated. “It almost would have been a dereliction of duty if we didn’t study this and the only way you can study this thing is you gotta go where the action is.”

However, the doctor denied the funds were used for “gain of function” research, which is a term used to describe medical research that alters an organism or disease in a way that increases pathogenesis, transmissibility or host range. This came after Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said “gain of function” was the primary effort of Wuhan scientists.

“About $800,000 was allocated and about $600,000 was spent over a five-year period, no more than that,” Dr. Fauci explained. “That comes to anywhere between $125,000 to $150,000 per year that went into collaboration with Wuhan.”

Earlier this month, the NIH director told Sen. Paul that the agency did not provide any funding to the Wuhan lab. Dr. Fauci’s latest confessions are now sparking calls to arrest him for lying under oath.

Meanwhile, as new evidence emerges backing the COVID-19 lab-leak theory, experts have suggested the virus could have been given to the Wuhan lab by the Chinese military.

On Tuesday, bioweapons expert Dr. Lawrence Sellin said the People’s Liberation Army sent the virus to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in early 2019. While citing Chinese sources, he said the virus then underwent testing on large primates.

Dr. Sellin claimed the military unit that provided the virus for testing is the same entity that worked with bat coronaviruses in the past. He added, COVID-19 may be part of the Chinese bioweapons program.

“They were beginning to document it in their military documents that this was one viable option either in a pre-war or warfare scenario and all that information is actually out on the internet right now, in terms of what the People’s Liberation Army has been saying about the use of biological weapons,” he explained. “They specifically talk about conditions before and during a war, so they look at it in both aspects.”

This comes just days after a U.S. Intelligence report revealed three Wuhan lab workers were hospitalized in November 2019 with coronavirus symptoms. This evidence reignited the theory that coronavirus originated at a Wuhan lab and was leaked to the public.
 

troutman

Seed Whore
Dr. Fauci Admits To Funding Bat Virus Research At Wuhan Lab, Says NIH Funneled $600K Over 5 Years

If somebody funded a Meth Lab would they be a criminal? I think Dr. Fauci is a criminal.

Go figure a Zionist funded the end of the World as we knew it. I wonder how much Bill Gates donated?
 

Switcher56

Comfortably numb!
IMHO, the latest scandal/reveal is nothing more than a grain of sand on the tip of the iceberg! ~ (Read not necessarily Wuhan related)
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
News item from February last year
Canadian corona scientist suddenly dies, link with the Netherlands

There is much more to the current coronavirus than we are officially told and the first murder is on its way.

The Chinese have stolen the coronavirus from Canadian scientist Frank Plummer who suddenly drops dead and who collaborated with the Dutch poisoners and bag fillers Ab Osterhaus and Ron Fouchier.


Actually, you can use the rule of thumb that with every large-scale crime, wherever, Dutch people always turn up. And the big coronavirus crime story is no different.

We have already shown in previous articles that the current highly contagious coronavirus is a bioweapon. A genetically modified virus, which even contains particles of the HIV virus and which scientists have unequivocally determined that it has been tampered with artificially.

In July 2019, a number of Chinese were caught stealing a coronavirus in a Canadian level 4 laboratory in Winnipeg, led by scientist Frank Plummer. (level 4 laboratory is a lab where the most dangerous types of deadly viruses are used).

wuhan1.jpg - Click image for larger version  Name:	wuhan1.jpg Views:	1 Size:	87.5 KB ID:	17867231
Just as there is a level 4 laboratory in Winnipeg, there is also one in the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the genetically manipulated corona virus suddenly appears in mid-December. According to an article on Zerohedge, it is established that the stolen virus from Winnipeg ended up in the Wuhan laboratory.

However, now it is reported that Canadian scientist Frank Plummer suddenly fell dead in Africa where he was for a conference.

67-year-old Frank Plummer was in Kenya giving a speech at the University of Nairobi when he suddenly fell dead . Nothing further has been released about the cause of death, which of course makes this a very suspicious death given the bizarre connections with the bioweapon corona.

But, it gets even weirder. Because the conscious virus that was stolen by the Chinese
came from none other than the Dutch poison mixers and bag fillers, Ab Osterhaus and Ron Fouchier.

They, in turn, had received this virus again in 2013 from Saudi Arabia to participate in research, after which both men quickly applied for a patent, as we previously described in detail in 2013:

In the middle of last year, a virus emerged in the Middle East that has sickened at least 44 people, of which 22 have died. This virus is officially called "Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus" or MERS-CoV. The doctor who first treated these patients sent a sample of this virus to Dutch virologists Ab Oosterhaus and Ron Fouchier for identification. However, these two immediately filed for a patent, much to the chagrin of Saudi Arabia, who says the patent stands in the way of the fight against the outbreak of this virus.

Another "coincidental coincidence" is that Plummer was also working on an HIV vaccine and that the now roving coronavirus also contains particles of HIV.

Reality is shrouded in mystery, but it is clear that there is more, much more going on around this virus than what is formally revealed.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
Maybe they went the way of all the members on here who's only reason for joining ICMag was to troll about Trump?
Last I heard was that the US intelligence agencies were divided on the origins of the virus and Biden was asking for an intelligence report.
I am happy to follow available science and will accept it IF it changes. Currently the only evidence has been the WHO excursion, which I think concluded that it was likely natural, but did not discount the possiblility of a leak.
Many experts are still saying that this occured naturally, including the majority of US intelligence, which is being reported as divided on the topic. I think I heard yesterday it was roughly 2/3 in favour of natural occurence but I could be wrong.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/biden-...hin-90-days/#x

Happy to eat a dick sandwich IF they find proof. I am also happy to follow science, as has been my view all along, rather than jump on any crackpot theory as soon as it sprouts up. I guess if you embrace every single conspiracy eventually you will be right about one. Lets wait and see. Bit too early for eating dick.

Can I ask though, whatever the US report comes out in favour of, would you accept that? It's just that you seem hell bent on only accepting alternative media, so I wonder if CNN report it will you believe it? Will you believe a Biden administration report in main stream media or is that just "fake".

bring it on, bring me logical explanations for all the known facts that show the chain from bat to human and ill happily accept it. i asked from the beginning for people to show me the best explanations and the best articles explaining how this covid is a natural occurrence. im still happy to read the evidence. but so far the natural coincidence side hasn't found a shred of proof to back it up, while a huge chain of circumstantial evidence points right at the lab leak of a man made corona bat virus being the most plausible explanation.

so yeah if the cia just comes out and say, nah mate, naahhh, not a lab leak mate, trust us. i won't be convinced. but if a logical study is presented that explains the known facts to the origins being of pure natural coincidence, ill accept it. ill be really happy not to have to live with the knowledge that all this was the result of a man made virus. thats a horrible way for humanity to end our way of life as we knew it before the virus. imagine that, humans fucked them selves up the ass on a planetary level, who wants that to be true? not me, please find me a better explanation.
 

St. Phatty

Active member
bring it on, bring me logical explanations for all the known facts that show the chain from bat to human and ill happily accept it. i asked from the beginning for people to show me the best explanations and the best articles explaining how this covid is a natural occurrence. im still happy to read the evidence. but so far the natural coincidence side hasn't found a shred of proof to back it up, while a huge chain of circumstantial evidence points right at the lab leak of a man made corona bat virus being the most plausible explanation.


Chris Martenson explained it as clearly as it could be explained, about a year ago.

it is man-made and part of the explanation involves something called a PRRA cleavage site.


I had to listen to the related webcasts several times to begin to get the science.

They are in the April to June "stack" of webcasts, on the somewhat strangely named "Youtube Peak Prosperity" channel.
 
Top