What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Covid is a accidental Lab leaked bioweapon

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
//////

06.11.21

Discovery Shows Human Cells can Write RNA sequences into DNA



In a discovery that challenges long-held dogma in biology, researchers show that mammalian cells can convert RNA sequences back into DNA, a feat more common in viruses than eukaryotic cells.




rna.jpeg



PHILADELPHIA – Cells contain machinery that duplicates DNA into a new set that goes into a newly formed cell. That same class of machines, called polymerases, also build RNA messages, which are like notes copied from the central DNA repository of recipes, so they can be read more efficiently into proteins. But polymerases were thought to only work in one direction DNA into DNA or RNA. This prevents RNA messages from being rewritten back into the master recipe book of genomic DNA. Now, Thomas Jefferson University researchers provide the first evidence that RNA segments can be written back into DNA, which potentially challenges the central dogma in biology and could have wide implications affecting many fields of biology.
“This work opens the door to many other studies that will help us understand the significance of having a mechanism for converting RNA messages into DNA in our own cells,” says Richard Pomerantz, PhD, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biology at Thomas Jefferson University. “The reality that a human polymerase can do this with high efficiency, raises many questions.” For example, this finding suggests that RNA messages can be used as templates for repairing or re-writing genomic DNA.
The work was published June 11[SUP]th[/SUP] in the journal Science Advances.
Together with first author Gurushankar Chandramouly and other collaborators, Dr. Pomerantz’s team started by investigating one very unusual polymerase, called polymerase theta. Of the 14 DNA polymerases in mammalian cells, only three do the bulk of the work of duplicating the entire genome to prepare for cell division. The remaining 11 are mostly involved in detecting and making repairs when there’s a break or error in the DNA strands. Polymerase theta repairs DNA, but is very error-prone and makes many errors or mutations. The researchers therefore noticed that some of polymerase theta’s “bad” qualities were ones it shared with another cellular machine, albeit one more common in viruses -- the reverse transcriptase. Like Pol theta, HIV reverse transcriptase acts as a DNA polymerase, but can also bind RNA and read RNA back into a DNA strand.
In a series of elegant experiments, the researchers tested polymerase theta against the reverse transcriptase from HIV, which is one of the best studied of its kind. They showed that polymerase theta was capable of converting RNA messages into DNA, which it did as well as HIV reverse transcriptase, and that it actually did a better job than when duplicating DNA to DNA. Polymerase theta was more efficient and introduced fewer errors when using an RNA template to write new DNA messages, than when duplicating DNA into DNA, suggesting that this function could be its primary purpose in the cell.
The group collaborated with Dr. Xiaojiang S. Chen’s lab at USC and used x-ray crystallography to define the structure and found that this molecule was able to change shape in order to accommodate the more bulky RNA molecule – a feat unique among polymerases.
“Our research suggests that polymerase theta’s main function is to act as a reverse transcriptase,” says Dr. Pomerantz. “In healthy cells, the purpose of this molecule may be toward RNA-mediated DNA repair. In unhealthy cells, such as cancer cells, polymerase theta is highly expressed and promotes cancer cell growth and drug resistance. It will be exciting to further understand how polymerase theta’s activity on RNA contributes to DNA repair and cancer-cell proliferation.”
This research was supported by NIH grants 1R01GM130889-01 and 1R01GM137124-01, and R01CA197506 and R01CA240392. This research was also supported in part by a Tower Cancer Research Foundation grant. The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Article reference: Gurushankar Chandramouly, Jiemin Zhao, Shane McDevitt, Timur Rusanov, Trung Hoang, Nikita Borisonnik, Taylor Treddinick, Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado, Tatiana Kent, Labiba A. Siddique, Joseph Mallon, Jacklyn Huhn, Zainab Shoda, Ekaterina Kashkina, Alessandra Brambati, Jeremy M. Stark, Xiaojiang S. Chen, and Richard T. Pomerantz, “Pol theta reverse transcribes RNA and promotes RNA-templated DNA repair,” Science Advances, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1771, 2021.
 

flylowgethigh

Non-growing Lurker
ICMag Donor
Good article Buzzmobile. This has become so tied up in conspiracy theory, politics, and anti China sentiment that everyone has lost sight of the science. I posted videos and aricles earlier in this thread and others that were ignored because it didn't fit the narrative. The narrative is politically driven. There are literally thousands of these viruses out there and the more people encroach on natural environment, interact with these animals, and sadly consume them, the more likley we will see pandemics. Viruses have occurred naturally in the past and will in the future. I urge people to take an hour out of their lives and look at the vid I posted earlier which give a great explanaition of these viruses. If he turns out to wrong, at the very least you will learn a lot about viruses. Edit; see below.
https://attend.mediahouse.com.au/bre...bYI94RPm4Hx5aA

Maybe the lab leak theory will prove correct, but I doubt it. Still no evidence. Just a lot of people joining imaginary dots. Now Biden has asked the intelligence agencies to answer what should be a scientific question. Not holding my breath on that answer, whatever it turns out to be.

Here is your science. TDS has made this WuFlu BS political.

https://bongino.com/scientist-on-wu...he-truth-earlier-because-it-might-help-trump/
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
? China secrecy?. China has never been forthcoming about anything they do. They will never let another country investigate their shit ever!!.

THIS! the only nation on the planet more tight-lipped is North Korea. this is what gives conspiracy theorists such fertile (bullshit) grounds to work with.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
Project Veritas reveals more censorship by tech oligarchs
[video]https://rumble.com/vhlrn9-project-veritas-reveals-more-censorship-by-tech-oligarchs.html[/video]

who voted for them to have the power to decide what discourse is allowed and what has to be suppressed? no wonder people are so easily misled, they have tools to subvert even the comments, lol.


this is the dream of totalitarian systems and the tech giants are normalizing it, by subjecting us to these totalitarian speech controls, in our daily interactions. anyone that thinks this is somehow good because the right kind of people are targeted, is short sighted beyond belief. what goes around fucking comes around, what's good for the goose is good for the gander, do not onto others what yee shall not have done on to you etc.
 

Amynamous

Active member
Here is your science. TDS has made this WuFlu BS political.

https://bongino.com/scientist-on-wuh...ht-help-trump/

From the article:

…Chan said there had been trepidation among some scientists about publicly discussing the lab leak hypothesis for fear that their words could be misconstrued or used to bolster racist rhetoric about how the coronavirus emerged. Trump fueled accusations that the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a research lab in the same city where the first Covid-19 cases were reported, was connected to the outbreak, and on numerous occasions called the pathogen the “Wuhan virus” or “kung flu.”

“At the time, it was scarier to be associated with Trump and to become a tool for racists, so people didn’t want to publicly call for an investigation into lab origins,” she said.


I would argue that what you call TDS above was actually warranted.

Also, as POTUS, trump would have access to intelligence from more than a dozen different intelligence agencies. He would also be aware that his administration had been funding the virus lab in Wuhan throughout his entire administration. So, in retrospect, it’s easy to see that Trump would theoretically be aware of things that others would not be privy to.
However, he lied so often, about things big and small, to the point he had zero credibility about everything. The only thing that was consistent was that his constant lying proved to be divisive and toxic. A reasonable and educated person in their position would be cautious about what they said publicly.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
a smart and educated person might make their own decision rather then just going to the opposite of what someone they dislike said, but thats just me i guess.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
REVEALED: Google & USAID Funded Wuhan Collaborator Peter Daszak’s Virus Experiments For Over A Decade.
Google funded research conducted by Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance – a controversial group which has openly collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on “killer” bat coronavirus research – for over a decade, The National Pulse can today reveal.


The unearthed financial ties between EcoHealth Alliance and Google follow months of big tech censorship of stories and individuals in support of the COVID-19 “lab leak” theory.


For more Wuhan scoops, support our work.



The Google-backed EcoHealth Alliance played a critical role in the cover-up of COVID-19’s origins through its president, Peter Daszak.

Daszak served on the wildly compromised World Health Organization’s (WHO) COVID-19 investigation team. He championed the efforts to “debunk” the lab origin theory of the virus, despite mounting support for the claim first made by experts on Steve Bannon’s War Room: Pandemic podcast in early January 2020.

Left-wing websites masquerading as “fact checkers” still call the lab theory “false,” despite the shift in tone from the Biden regime, leading world scientists, and intelligence officials.

EcoHealth Alliance also funneled hundreds of thousands of U.S. taxpayer dollars from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to its research partner, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, to conduct studies on “killer” bat coronaviruses.

And Google.org, the charity arm of the tech behemoth, has also been funding studies carried out by EcoHealth alliance researchers including Peter Daszak since at least 2010.
‘The Generous Support of the American People’.


The decade-plus relationship is evident in a 2010 study on bat flaviviruses, which lists Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance Vice President Jonathan Epstein as authors, that thanks Google.org for funding. A 2014 study on henipavirus spillover, which was authored by Daszak, similarly declares it was partly “supported by Google.org.”

MUST READ: Facebook's CCP-Linked 'Fact-Checker' is Now Censoring Stories Critical Of Zuckerberg-Funded Wuhan Lab Partners.

Screen-Shot-2021-06-19-at-10.40.37-AM.png
Google acknowledgement on the Flavivirus study.
And a 2015 paper focusing on herpes, which lists EcoHealth’s Daszak and Epstein as authors, reveals it was “supported by funding from the US Agency for International Development’s Emerging Pandemic Threats: PREDICT program, the Skoll Foundation, and Google.org.”
Screen-Shot-2021-06-19-at-10.43.09-AM.png
USAID support listed.
In 2018, EcoHealth Alliance researchers authored a paper entitled “Serologic and Behavioral Risk Survey of Workers with Wildlife Contact in China” that was “made possible” by the financial contribution of Google.org.

The 14-page paper’s abstract summarizes:

We report on a study conducted in Guangdong Province, China, to characterize behaviors and perceptions associated with transmission of pathogens with pandemic potential in highly exposed human populations at the animal-human interface. A risk factor/exposure survey was administered to individuals with high levels of exposure to wildlife.

The paper appears to lay the groundwork for the theory that SARS-like coronaviruses could originate in a wet market in a province close to the city of Wuhan – the likely epicenter of COVID-19.

“The majority of human infectious diseases have an animal origin, therefore understanding the human-animal interface as it relates to disease emergence and risk is of upmost importance The increasing frequency and variety of human-wildlife interactions in China provide opportunities for the transmission of zoonotic pathogens from animals to humans,” the paper begins.

The paper also highlights how SARS has “emerged in humans and other mammals in wet markets”:

Handling, transporting, and butchering of hunted or farmed wildlife poses a risk of pathogen spillover into humans. In southern China provinces, including Guangdong, a significant percentage of the population obtains fresh meat for consumption from wet markets, community markets that specialize in selling and butchering live animals, including animals that are rare and endangered. Research has demonstrated that human-animal interfaces, such as within these wet markets, provide an ideal environment for infectious disease emergence, transmission, and amplification.

https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusi...alth-research/

ya think cancel culture champions you knowing the truth?
ya cannot even use the wrong pronouns without some SJW being offended.
and Amy, what makes you think TRUMP knew every f*cking detail of every department/agencies activities...He was kept busy fighting the deepstate, and was mostly given inaccurate unqualified advice from the very same. pathetic partisan pulp, imo.
 

Amynamous

Active member
and Amy, what makes you think TRUMP knew every f*cking detail of every department/agencies activities...He was kept busy fighting the deepstate, and was mostly given inaccurate unqualified advice from the very same. pathetic partisan pulp, imo.

As noted in your link, the NIH, the DOD, USAID and other federal departments provided funding and most of the ones listed answer directly or indirectly to POTUS. POTUS is responsible for what he does as well as what his administration does. The buck stops with POTUS. Just because the last guy was a babbling moron does not excuse him of from what his administration did, regardless of whether he was aware or not. Also, As I mentioned earlier, there are multiple layers of redundancy when it comes to approving funding for expensive programs. Money simply doesn’t get spent in the federal government without multiple layers of approval, and in this specific instance, with the ultimate approval coming from the White House.

In my opinion, the trump administration WAS the swampy deep state, but he seemed to spend most of his time locked in his bedroom watching Foxatainment, tweeting or playing golf. As for inaccurate and unqualified advice, i would guess that was probably Jared and Ivanka. I certainly do not believe he was getting inaccurate and unqualified advice from his National Security advisers, nor his various appointed intelligence directors.
 

CosmicGiggle

Well-known member
Moderator
Veteran
..... A reasonable and educated person in their position would be cautious about what they said publicly.

I don't recall racism being an issue in 2018, especially anti-Asian racism, more likely the real fear was the very real possibility of damaging our lucrative, inter-connected political relationships with China.

No one wants to start a war with a well connected business partner. ;)
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
Project Veritas reveals more censorship by tech oligarchs
[video]https://rumble.com/vhlrn9-project-veritas-reveals-more-censorship-by-tech-oligarchs.html[/video]

who voted for them to have the power to decide what discourse is allowed and what has to be suppressed? no wonder people are so easily misled, they have tools to subvert even the comments, lol.


this is the dream of totalitarian systems and the tech giants are normalizing it, by subjecting us to these totalitarian speech controls, in our daily interactions. anyone that thinks this is somehow good because the right kind of people are targeted, is short sighted beyond belief. what goes around fucking comes around, what's good for the goose is good for the gander, do not onto others what yee shall not have done on to you etc.

If you look into the history of those involved, you find everything but integrity.
Project Veritas has a track record of using manipulated video deceptively.
Financed by those behind the heritage foundation.
Every time they have ever gone to court,
they have been exposed as the distributor
of manipulated video. They are a part of the
right wing echo chamber.
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
REVEALED: Google & USAID Funded Wuhan Collaborator Peter Daszak’s Virus Experiments For Over A Decade.
Google funded research conducted by Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance – a controversial group which has openly collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on “killer” bat coronavirus research – for over a decade, The National Pulse can today reveal.


The unearthed financial ties between EcoHealth Alliance and Google follow months of big tech censorship of stories and individuals in support of the COVID-19 “lab leak” theory.


For more Wuhan scoops, support our work.



The Google-backed EcoHealth Alliance played a critical role in the cover-up of COVID-19’s origins through its president, Peter Daszak.

Daszak served on the wildly compromised World Health Organization’s (WHO) COVID-19 investigation team. He championed the efforts to “debunk” the lab origin theory of the virus, despite mounting support for the claim first made by experts on Steve Bannon’s War Room: Pandemic podcast in early January 2020.

Left-wing websites masquerading as “fact checkers” still call the lab theory “false,” despite the shift in tone from the Biden regime, leading world scientists, and intelligence officials.

EcoHealth Alliance also funneled hundreds of thousands of U.S. taxpayer dollars from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to its research partner, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, to conduct studies on “killer” bat coronaviruses.

And Google.org, the charity arm of the tech behemoth, has also been funding studies carried out by EcoHealth alliance researchers including Peter Daszak since at least 2010.
‘The Generous Support of the American People’.


The decade-plus relationship is evident in a 2010 study on bat flaviviruses, which lists Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance Vice President Jonathan Epstein as authors, that thanks Google.org for funding. A 2014 study on henipavirus spillover, which was authored by Daszak, similarly declares it was partly “supported by Google.org.”

MUST READ: Facebook's CCP-Linked 'Fact-Checker' is Now Censoring Stories Critical Of Zuckerberg-Funded Wuhan Lab Partners.

Screen-Shot-2021-06-19-at-10.40.37-AM.png
Google acknowledgement on the Flavivirus study.
And a 2015 paper focusing on herpes, which lists EcoHealth’s Daszak and Epstein as authors, reveals it was “supported by funding from the US Agency for International Development’s Emerging Pandemic Threats: PREDICT program, the Skoll Foundation, and Google.org.”
Screen-Shot-2021-06-19-at-10.43.09-AM.png
USAID support listed.
In 2018, EcoHealth Alliance researchers authored a paper entitled “Serologic and Behavioral Risk Survey of Workers with Wildlife Contact in China” that was “made possible” by the financial contribution of Google.org.

The 14-page paper’s abstract summarizes:

We report on a study conducted in Guangdong Province, China, to characterize behaviors and perceptions associated with transmission of pathogens with pandemic potential in highly exposed human populations at the animal-human interface. A risk factor/exposure survey was administered to individuals with high levels of exposure to wildlife.

The paper appears to lay the groundwork for the theory that SARS-like coronaviruses could originate in a wet market in a province close to the city of Wuhan – the likely epicenter of COVID-19.

“The majority of human infectious diseases have an animal origin, therefore understanding the human-animal interface as it relates to disease emergence and risk is of upmost importance The increasing frequency and variety of human-wildlife interactions in China provide opportunities for the transmission of zoonotic pathogens from animals to humans,” the paper begins.

The paper also highlights how SARS has “emerged in humans and other mammals in wet markets”:

Handling, transporting, and butchering of hunted or farmed wildlife poses a risk of pathogen spillover into humans. In southern China provinces, including Guangdong, a significant percentage of the population obtains fresh meat for consumption from wet markets, community markets that specialize in selling and butchering live animals, including animals that are rare and endangered. Research has demonstrated that human-animal interfaces, such as within these wet markets, provide an ideal environment for infectious disease emergence, transmission, and amplification.

https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusi...alth-research/

ya think cancel culture champions you knowing the truth?
ya cannot even use the wrong pronouns without some SJW being offended.
and Amy, what makes you think TRUMP knew every f*cking detail of every department/agencies activities...He was kept busy fighting the deepstate, and was mostly given inaccurate unqualified advice from the very same. pathetic partisan pulp, imo.

Impressive looking material we have before us. Would hardly appear to be a shoestring operation.
What is it other than his clams that ever led you think donald fought the deep state ?
I would maintain the opposite is true, and he did as he was told by the deep state, just like the one before him and the one after him.
What each and every president has in common, is they never say no when the deep state demands more funding.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
If you look into the history of those involved, you find everything but integrity.
Project Veritas has a track record of using manipulated video deceptively.
Financed by those behind the heritage foundation.
Every time they have ever gone to court,
they have been exposed as the distributor
of manipulated video. They are a part of the
right wing echo chamber.

yeah man i know, the powers that be were, and are murderous greedy pigs. they used deception for decades and decades to profit off the system they forced on us.

rockerfeler medicine; they forced a profit based medical system on you and all the rest, but now, magically, everything they do is for the best, yes? censor people, hide information, shadow ban people all for the sake of humanity right? LMAO. apparently they went from being devils, to being angels ever after covid, lol.

you say veritas has no integrity and is right wing, again i say i don't give a solitary fuck what sex, political orientation, sexual preference, colour, religion, or age they are. ALL I CARE ABOUT IS IF ITS TRUE OR NOT. are the documents real? does facefook really act as the speech police for the human race, even the comments? is that what we want?

btw just about every news report, about just about anything, is edited. the point is not how the video is edited, the point is, are those documents real? are those screen shots of internal tools fake? maybe we can deal with the message rather then the messenger eh.
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
yeah man i know, the powers that be were, and are murderous greedy pigs. they used deception for decades and decades to profit off the system they forced on us.

rockerfeler medicine; they forced a profit based medical system on you and all the rest, but now, magically, everything they do is for the best, yes? censor people, hide information, shadow ban people all for the sake of humanity right? LMAO. apparently they went from being devils, to being angels ever after covid, lol.

you say veritas has no integrity and is right wing, again i say i don't give a solitary fuck what sex, political orientation, sexual preference, colour, religion, or age they are. ALL I CARE ABOUT IS IF ITS TRUE OR NOT. are the documents real? does facefook really act as the speech police for the human race, even the comments? is that what we want?

btw just about every news report, about just about anything, is edited. the point is not how the video is edited, the point is, are those documents real? are those screen shots of internal tools fake? maybe we can deal with the message rather then the messenger eh.

You do of course know the answer, but let's review the history. Every country controls the media as a matter of national security.
If we look back to the WWI era we are speaking of the press, the postal system, and AM radio.
The control and a military connection has always been there right from the inception with both permits and ownership.
That did not change as a result of WWII, but it sure did evolve, and grow, which gave us TV as an upgrade to the radio.
The tech industry was born out of the arms industry.
The Internet was not built as a gift of communications to the world by the United States.
It was and remains a weapons system.
With advertising, we are told repeatedly how much the world has changed.
You ask if facebook acts in your interest, you do know the answer.
You ask if that is how we would like things to be.

I am no more pleased by what we have than you are.
My own means of dealing with it, are first not to use
things like facebook, and second to acknowledge
it was the same people who cursed the planet with
continuous nonstop conflict for profit since the second
world war, that brought us the Internet. I have heard
it described as a panopticon.
That seems more accurate to me today than when I
first heard the term used.
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
if you selectively edit anything to try to make a false point, it is FALSE. regardless of whether you want it to be true or not. show it all, or don't show it at all. bullshit is bullshit...
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
if you selectively edit anything to try to make a false point, it is FALSE. regardless of whether you want it to be true or not. show it all, or don't show it at all. bullshit is bullshit...
The outfit in question was providing such lousy results a white box consultant was brought in to provide training session to improve outcomes.
 

gaiusmarius

me
Veteran
unless the screen shots were fake i don't see how you can make the case for editing changing the meaning. out of interest, you you disbelieve the claim about policing free speech? what exactly is being claimed thats deceptive or on true? has face fuck said the documents are false? have they said they don't do this stuff and don't have such tools? no? hm....but its still fake, i see.
 

Dr.RedWhite

Active member
From the article:

…Chan said there had been trepidation among some scientists about publicly discussing the lab leak hypothesis for fear that their words could be misconstrued or used to bolster racist rhetoric about how the coronavirus emerged. Trump fueled accusations that the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a research lab in the same city where the first Covid-19 cases were reported, was connected to the outbreak, and on numerous occasions called the pathogen the “Wuhan virus” or “kung flu.”

“At the time, it was scarier to be associated with Trump and to become a tool for racists, so people didn’t want to publicly call for an investigation into lab origins,” she said.


I would argue that what you call TDS above was actually warranted.

Also, as POTUS, trump would have access to intelligence from more than a dozen different intelligence agencies. He would also be aware that his administration had been funding the virus lab in Wuhan throughout his entire administration. So, in retrospect, it’s easy to see that Trump would theoretically be aware of things that others would not be privy to.
However, he lied so often, about things big and small, to the point he had zero credibility about everything. The only thing that was consistent was that his constant lying proved to be divisive and toxic. A reasonable and educated person in their position would be cautious about what they said publicly.


So you say Trump "lied" so often, if you are not a bot, parrot for the leftrat media and utterly duped would you give us an example of a lie Trump put out that matched Obama's "you can keep your doctor" lie? If you were not stuck on navel gazing you might remember (do bots remember) that running this country is not like running an ice cream stand, many things going on at the same time, such as the second farce impeachment, added to the first and the Russia collusion hoax took up a lot of the presidents time, problems caused without reason by the leftrats in the media and the DNC.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top