Yeah, and I seriously doubt we'll be getting a friendly in his place. Maybe C Everett Koop, motherfucker got styyyle.^^^ True. But after following him for a few years, he seems like the last person we'd want traing people on a national level.
Yeah, and I seriously doubt we'll be getting a friendly in his place. Maybe C Everett Koop, motherfucker got styyyle.^^^ True. But after following him for a few years, he seems like the last person we'd want traing people on a national level.
The time is nearing to start flowering one of my plants I believe, it is about 11.5" tall but 15" wide. I just have a few quick questions about the flowering process.
The whole time my plants have been under a fluorescent ballast because I am going the cost effective route. I was just curious if it is possible to flower them under fluorescent lights as well. From what I have been reading online, 10,000 lumens per square foot is the rule of thumb. Is that true?
I was contemplating multiple cfl lamps shining on all different parts of the plant to ensure light is reaching every part of the plant. Ideas and Recommendations?
Would my idea of putting cfl lamps shining at different areas of the plant provide better penetration?
a 3 yr old 7.0 MP sony cyber shot. for whatever reason has always done nice macros. I got a newer camera with higher MP's but its macro is worse.
That was exactly what I was talking about. It would have plenty of light I would think. I just don't want to fork out all the money for HIDs, ballasts, ventilation, etc...
They also have some pretty high wattage cfl's out. Is your power bill the concern, or the cost of the equipment?Would my idea of putting cfl lamps shining at different areas of the plant provide better penetration?
exactly what model do you have..I notice 3 different 7MP cyber shot cameras offered fro sale.
I want to buy one for my wife's jewelry sales business website, and of course to show off my flowers.
They also have some pretty high wattage cfl's out. Is your power bill the concern, or the cost of the equipment?
Both... I am only growing 3 plants just out of curiosity, so I don't see investing the money in an awesome grow set up. I need to find a place a little more permanent before I do any of that anyways.
If it comes down to needing a more efficient light then I have no problem with that. I just don't want to have to go through all the trouble of mounting the ballast and supplying it with power until I move into a more permanent place.
Gorgeous, grow! Would you please describe your setup to me. It appears to be in cardboard boxes. Is that so??? Amazing!
Pardon my newness...I have that "Newbie" ailment....total fascination with any unique setup. Have a great day!
I hope I am posting this in the correct place. {blush}
Peace and green hugs,
You'll be good with the CFL, and I think you'll get some great buds, but as others have said yield will be the most impacted factor. Have fun learning, this is a very rewarding endeavor!
I respectfully disagree, with yield being the lacking factor...I recently visited a cfl garden, I too, thought that yield would be greatly effected. This garden had some very large, very dense buds..The only downside I saw is that they do not seem to finish as quickly under cfls..(granted this guy had the cfl equivalent,of a 3k set-up)
But it is very possible to get dense buds,and good yields with cfls..You might need to invest in a welding mask though because to hit the correct lumen ratio,you need a lot of cfls