Pics won't help bud, not for what we look for, trichome size and effect can only be measured in smoke, and I found that the hard way by debating with a lot of people over this, just to realize that without smoking it all what we say is just wordsSo where is the pics of your great HPS buds? That’s what I want to see.
Lol, my panels were state of the art at the time, cost more then 1k, vegged like no other, they were shit in flowerAnd no you don’t need to try them all, what I’m suggesting is maybe you didn’t do enough initial research and made a poor buying decision. You still didn’t mention any brands you tried? So no don’t buy them all. Do research and find people with good results with a specific light and then deicde to buy that one.
And besides that, your claim of us not doing enough research is bogus, me and I'm sure a lot of people here smoke much weed everyday, you think that 90% of the people who grow just bought the wrong lights or something haha, the same people 2 years ago had fire weed all over, low quality was rare to find.
I'm done with other people side by side cuz like I told u, a plant looks has nothing to do with it's trifecta, also people discussion on smoking experience lol haha that's the whole point, a lot of people who smoke medicore weed and say it's good, big problem.If you’re not willing to do that ok cool so it’s you are lazy. Not that LED is no good. And if you actually click the link it’s not just lab results and it’s a full grow journal all the way through and they actually talk about the actual smoking experience. Not just lab results. But as you just admitted you’re not willing to read a few pages to get a better understanding. You just think LED sucks and no matter if you have proof of truth you will just ignore it…
People grow amazing plants with fox tails all over and say it's amazing
People grow shit and say it's amazing
Sorry I just don't trust no one, not even science if it doesn't match reality, someone is lying, you decide.
Stop talking nonsense and throwing speculations, my panels were 720w each and 110k lm, and I had 2 of them in a 8x4See y’all can’t be going and buying a led light with 1000 ppf and then comparing to 2000 ppf and claim LED yields less and sucks. So you’re going in the same space. And giving the same amount of plants less light! And we all know if you do not provide plants enough light then they will produce lard and leafy buds. So I believe from what y’all are saying that’s what’s happening. You feel for a sales pitch and didn’t actually do your research on the par tests and ppf output. So you grew buds with some larf because most likely you didn’t provide the plants with enough light. Which we all know the same thing would happen with any light. It’s not the LED. It’s you not having the right knowledge to actually convert to LED in the first place. That’s what I get from what y’all are saying here.
My hps setup now in the same space is 1200w, 180k lm max
The led is far more superior in output, and indeed it grew my plants like crazy, but the final product was shit !
So, you, like 99% of this market want dense tubmled, no glue, 25 min high, fox tailed buds
We don't !
When the day comes and you will actually read the math and science behind those light sources, instead of posting models of the same shit diodes just under a new name with a bigger price we can make a more elaborate debate about the benefits of each tech.