What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

chem #4 VS CHEM 91

G

Guest

here are some picture of my chem 4 and 91 moms to compare.
This is really for inspecta. the 91 is like a week into flower or less and the 4 is a mom. I will be flowering out both and show both along the way. I also have double dawg and chem d. so we can look at the growth and flower charicterisitics (sp) of all three. This is not as much for smoke report but more to compare the genetics of the 4.


here is my 91 mom just put into flower







gotta run more pics to come
 

Babbabud

Bodhisattva of the Earth
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Alright great thread ...ill be following along on this one. Thanks for sharing this is why we show up:)
 
G

Guest

awesome, thanks for putting this up joe! i've been wanting to hear your comparison for a while. :)
 

Nspecta

Well-known member
Veteran
ChemDawg Trials...

ChemDawg Trials...

joebrand said:
here are some picture of my chem 4 and 91 moms to compare.
This is really for inspecta. the 91 is like a week into flower or less and the 4 is a mom. I will be flowering out both and show both along the way. I also have double dawg and chem d. so we can look at the growth and flower charicterisitics (sp) of all three. This is not as much for smoke report but more to compare the genetics of the 4.


here is my 91 mom just put into flower


Hey Joe~ I'm in full agreement with all tha catz who've posted up in this thread thus far...definitely gonna be some valuable information ta share.

I just triggered my final trial with tha O-sixes a couple dayz ago...I've got 'anutha' ChemDawg ('91...???), a couple OG Kushes, & Sour D in thar with 'em...so should be a good chance ta share & compare notes.

On a completely unrelated note...I came across a phrase that seems very fitting for tha whole ChemDawg/Diesel/Kush debate...At Sixes & Sevens...which means...In a state of total confusion or disarray....HehHeh, maybe it's just me. :chin:

Al'right, onto tha comparisons...keep in mind different grow tech's make fer different phenotypical variations...with that said...here's some comparison pics o' tha ChemDawg('91/?) I have, the '06 ChemDawg #3(I didn't manage ta get pics o' tha #4...but tha 3 & 4 share tha same general profile & leaf pattern), & what I believe ta be tha Original OG Kush.

ChemDawg '91(?)
10092P1040476_copy.JPG

'06 ChemDawg #3
10092P1040497_copy.JPG

PK a.k.a. OG Kush
10092P1040577_copy.JPG

Just tha profile shotz ta start with...I'll get tha overhead & leaf shotz posted up as soon as I get anutha chance....oh yeah, and, tha veg pics are from my last trial taken a few months ago...&...at tha time my camera's exposure was actin' up...reason for tha funky lookin' pics.


IGT
 
Last edited:
G

Guest

awesome post nspecta! does the #4 have the same density as the #3? the 91 looks almost lanky in comparison. you can definately see the resemblence in the og from the 91! :)
 

JDOG6000

Active member
Veteran
Nice.
This will help me alot.
Thanks guys.
Been puffin chemdawg for the first time lately.
I like.
Also been puffin the "Larry cut" of OG Kush(original)
And Banana OG which is OK.
Maybe if grown better it could taste better.
But it was potent.
Hydro though so not much flavor.
The chemdawg is awesome.
Anyway back to the thread...
 

Nspecta

Well-known member
Veteran
High&Lonesome said:
awesome post nspecta! does the #4 have the same density as the #3? the 91 looks almost lanky in comparison. you can definately see the resemblence in the og from the 91! :)

Hey H&L~ All 4 of tha '06 ChemDawgs share tha same structure & look in veg...they don't really differentiate to much until flower...none of them seem to have tha lankiness that tha '91 has...they are also much bushier as you've noted.

In my initial trial with tha ChemDawg ('91/?) & PK (OGK)...those two plants look almost identical...tha PK is just slightly lankier, with thinner leaves, & smaller buds...if someone was going off of just tha finished product and hadn't grown 'em...they'd prolly say they're tha same exact thing. :chin:


IGT
 

Dank-j

Active member
JDOG6000, I am confused what Nspecta means by that also?

PK = pure kush != OG Kush???

Joebrand, I'll be keeping around to watch this show.. should be a good one ;) The Chem makes me drool.
 

Nspecta

Well-known member
Veteran
At Sixes & Sevens...

At Sixes & Sevens...

JDOG6000 said:
Can I ask what the PK means?

Dank-j said:
JDOG6000, I am confused what Nspecta means by that also?

PK = pure kush != OG Kush???


I'm kinda confused by it too ta be honest...all I know is my buddy got tha cut labeled merely PK...<<< seems ta be a trend eh. :chin:


Dr. Kushman said:
I've been digging the PK (aka Pure Kush aka OG Kush)...although I don't know why it's called Pure Kush, considering it's obviously a sativa, compared to the Bubba Kush which is totally indica.

This quote...^^^^^^^...is from a cat who's had tha PK/OGK since '97...he has tha same cut we have.

I have no idea how this relates to Suge Nites "PK"...but...I have a hunch that Suge just made up a bunch o' shit...I mean, c'mon, he called his "PK" Bubba Kush first, then Piss Kush, then Pure Kush, & then tried ta call it Purple Kush...gimme a break...it's clearly not tha same cut we have...so who knows. :chin:


Still...at sixes & sevens...


IGT
 
G

Guest

great info inspecta! whatever the pk/ogk cut you have actually is, it does look like it could be a s1 seed found in 91 dawg.
 
Last edited:

SmokeyPufmaster

Active member
Veteran
JB, I'm down with this one. Excellent timing as I'll be flowering some Jan 1st. All you need is the "Sister" for the complete line. I thought you had that one too?
 
G

Guest

thnx Inspecta

I need to work on my pohotos. Just finished some 1,2,3,4. nut the best run some what negelected and had mites. (I also remoded my room,so they were flowered in another room). But I will post up some pics of the nugz. I have never had balls on my 3's. I would say it like low temps in general to push more res at fattin up a bit. INMO.

Nspecta did you top any of the palnts you threw up? ??????? will hybrid vigor or maturity of the clone effect growth patterns and leaf structure. My boy who gave me the cut who flew east and mailed to himself fromt the mand we all know and love says its a little beat down after all these years.
Altough the one I have in flower is cranking- dirt in a dutch pot.


My gallery is full and it is a pain in the ass to delete pics they make you do them individually.(sucks) Anyone know a better way are a way to post into a thread without the gallery let me know
 

JDOG6000

Active member
Veteran
Ya Nspecta, there are too many names for Pure Kush, no doubt.
I've heard Puss, Pure and Piss Kush.
Anyway.
That PKOG looks kind of like chemdawg.
Maybe an S1 like was said before.
I have some interesting white Mustangs in veg.
I think I have 2 chemdawg phenos and a few DOG pheno's.
But the 2 chemdawg pheno's are different.
One is more like the Sour Diesel chemdawg look.
And the other is like chemdawg D looking.
I think I posted them.
Anyway, can't wait to see these in flower.
This is really gonna help me out alot.
 
G

Guest






here are some sd,#4 AND DD. This is the direction I am headed. to work mostly with these 3. T5 rule. These are in dutch puts with pure coc fed growing edge nutz. Folier fed vho and rhizotonic seperetly. Not sure the veg time. The cuts from my areo cloner are much better plant. ROOTS = Mass
 
Top