What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Ceramic Metal Halide (CMH)

greenwithenvy

Active member
Veteran
The "spectrum" they produced with their meter on the HPS Hortilux confirms what we are saying here. Compare that spectrum to Hortilux's and any other HPS spectrum that exists and it proves that their meter is not taking the correct measurement.

Here is what the Hortilux HPS spectrum looks like when the correct instrumentation is used.
View ImageView Image

here is the spectrum of the 860w Allstart CMH when run at 1000w with magnetic ballast m47.
View ImageView Image

DNA is using the 860w Allstart and the 330w Allstart and relabeling it as their own lamps.

I don't have a problem with a company using the Philips lamp and relabeling it to catch the horticulturist consumer's eye. What I have a problem with is when a company states that THEY developed the lamp. It's dishonest.

This was all I was trying to say. The 900 is a better spectrum than the HPS hands down. Plus they now have a electronic ballast for it. Ihave not seen it yet. Doesn't the hortilux blue have a full unspike like spectrum?
 
This was all I was trying to say. The 900 is a better spectrum than the HPS hands down. Plus they now have a electronic ballast for it. Ihave not seen it yet. Doesn't the hortilux blue have a full unspike like spectrum?
Yes, the electronic ballast part is nice.

No, the Hortilux Blue does not have an "unspike" like spectrum.

1000w Hortilux Blue SPD,
1000whortiluxbluewithdi.jpg


400w Hortilux Blue with 64w of 630nm/660nm RED LED ADDED,
400whortblue64w630660nm.jpg
 
I still believe that DNA = GEL. I still won't pay their retarded prices. It's apparent they have to use trickery to sell their products.

Their website shows the 315W bulb but they market it as a 330W bulb... They say that the first year of warranty is covered through DNA and second year is covered through manufacture... So who is the manufacture?

If you need any further proof that they're the same company... GEL kits ship from (and when I returned my 140w kit) Meridian, ID. DNA's contact section shows Boise, ID on the map. Meridian and Boise are right next to each other, 11 miles to be exact.

Ya, so there are two completely independent and separate "high-tech" lighting companies 11 miles apart and in IDAHO? lol, ya ok. They're the same damn company, same people, same ballasts, etc. It's a fucking gimmick to get more market share but act like competing companies.
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I doubt it. GEL has a pretty wide product spectrum which goes substantially beyond our little corner of the lighting world. I do know that they were supposed to be working with some "local" growers with the CeramaTek line, so it's very possible those growers talked GEL into letting them distribute their product line under a different company name.
 
I doubt it. GEL has a pretty wide product spectrum which goes substantially beyond our little corner of the lighting world. I do know that they were supposed to be working with some "local" growers with the CeramaTek line, so it's very possible those growers talked GEL into letting them distribute their product line under a different company name.

Yea, but why would GEL let someone else move in on their market? Sure, DNA is paying for the product from GEL but GEL is making less than selling directly to customers. Makes no sense to me.
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
It's the same thing that GEL is doing with Cycloptics/Greenbeams. Most manufacturers of any scale aren't going to try and pursue every niche market that their product might fit - it's easier to let some people who know the market put together a package and sell it. They may make a little less margin, but they don't have to learn about the market, or employ and train people for it, etc. In Greenbeams case, they are primarily targeting the educational/research grow chamber retrofits and using their own reflector. In this case, you've got some growers with an entrepreneurial bent that see potential in putting together a package with a third-party reflector.
 
It's the same thing that GEL is doing with Cycloptics/Greenbeams. Most manufacturers of any scale aren't going to try and pursue every niche market that their product might fit - it's easier to let some people who know the market put together a package and sell it. They may make a little less margin, but they don't have to learn about the market, or employ and train people for it, etc. In Greenbeams case, they are primarily targeting the educational/research grow chamber retrofits and using their own reflector. In this case, you've got some growers with an entrepreneurial bent that see potential in putting together a package with a third-party reflector.

DNA is the same thing as GEL, though. GEL knows that their Ceramatek line appeals to growers... They'd have no reason to sell to DNA strictly because of a niche market - that they are already involved in.

OK, so putting aside who really owns DNA, we can agree that more than likely it is GEL supplying DNA with the hardware. If you buy from DNA then you are essentially buying from GEL.

Are we to believe that a couple of stoners started DNA? Contacted Philips, got a custom bulb made, sourced out a pre-made ballast or commissioned a company to make a custom ballast - All while being right down the road from GEL? Unlikely in my opinion. I think that GEL and DNA have very close ties. Now you can say that GEL has several other lighting products in their line-up, true... Have you contacted them? Take a look at their contact page. Contacts from NY, Florida, Dubai (lol), etc... Yet their all the same # and go to the same place. In fact, no one ever answers the fucking phone at any of those numbers except the California one, which is how I was placed in touch with a "regional" rep, who happens to be in Idaho. In my opinion, GEL is a company trying to look a lot bigger than they really are. Good for them.

Are their ballasts any good? I don't know, haven't used one and I'm not trying to dispute the quality of their hardware, only that it seems to me that GEL = DNA. This is all my opinion but I think it's a conglomerate. There is nothing unusual or far-fetched about that theory.

All in all, I really don't give a shit about DNA's BS SPDs or GEL as a whole. I'm really in this thread because I'm on the CMH train and that's it. I think GELs prices are laughable. I've received several different price quotes from the rep at GEL. Explains why they don't list a price on their website, they charge whatever they feel like depending on which way the wind is blowing that day.
 

senor coconut

Active member
Not sure rives:
http://cycloptics.com/ceramatek_ballast
Here they are referring to the 315W, it's stated that dimming affects both lamp life and lumen maintenance, also in the table shown.. 50% dimming reduces lumens from 35121 to 13629 and CRI from 94% to 75%, that's some spectrum change...

If it's true at this point I prefer to continue with 150W Hps, maybe I'll switch to CMHs when I'll have a larger area to play with... at least 4 times bigger and use that 315W bulb at full power

Interesting the 0-10V interface, I've an Arduino chipboard to play with.. natively it has 5V output but it can be easily modded to get 10V.. maybe if I add some temperature and humidity sensors I can rely on it to control lamps and fans and get a semi-automated environment, that would be cool for sure :)

Senor, I've read similar about dimming and the effects from it, but it appeared to be restricted to the 210w lamp. I have also read that dimming does not impact the lamp life or spectrum. Dunno.

With the Philips ballast, at least, it goes to full brightness for the first 10 minutes of operation.

From the Philips CDM Elite Design Guide - "The MasterColorCDM Elite MW 315W system is designed to be able to dim the lamp using a 0–10V interface. The system will always operate at nominal power during the first 10 minutes of operation, after which it can be dimmed. The lowest dimming level is 50% of nominal power. Dimming the lamp has no impact on lifetime of the system. Light technical properties of the dimmed lamp will not be according to the nominal specifications specified in this document. Upon switching to nominal power, the lamp will again perform as specified.

The MasterColor CDM Elite MW 210W system is similarly dimmable to 50%. Dimming for more than 25% of the time is not recommended as this will reduce the maintained (mean) lumens over life."
 
You are correct. DNA is using an "outline" of the SPD. Their instrumentation is most likely used in photography or something to give you an idea of the color that is present in a particular light source.

Only a blackbody light source would emit such a large "full-coverage" type of spectrum like the Sun for instance.

I have a hard time believing that 900w TruSun spectrum. I think if they were to use the proper type of spectral analyzing equipment it would read otherwise.

Unfortunately, I think companies can get away with alteration of their spectrum charts a little when advertising a lamp.

Also, I don't see how it would be possible for this company to have an exact copy of the Philips lamp and have offical rights to it. Therefore, it must be the 860w Allstart they are using. Perhaps driving the lamp at a higher wattage would increase the amount of red output they are claiming. Who knows.
I agree...in their vids it is a handheld spectragraphing unit that does cross references to cri etc...It is a pricey $3k unit but far from the accuracy the manufacturers use...does seem to round off the graph
 
I can't speculate on what the absolute spectrum is........
But, I'm willing to make some assumptions.
The bulbs that they are selling are probably standard Philips bulbs maybe re-branded.
That is not a bad thing!!!

Philips needs to realize that there is a market here, and be willing to put forth research, time, and money.
The Elite Agro bulb is sumwhat of an anomaly according to my current understanding of how and why it ever got made.
As far as I'm concerned, either of the DNA bulb lines should work and work well.
As far as efficiency goes, I believe the 315w series of lamps produce the best heat to light ratio per watt, with a damn good spectrum to boot.

Ya, a 315 is not a 1k, but......

This porridge is too hot.
The 1k hps was too hot and didn't fit my rectangle very will.

This porridge is too cold.
The leds worked great, but it will take a shit load of them to do a good job and it would be damn expensive and complex.

This porridge is just right.
2 315w seem to do a great job of covering my little 3x6 area.
If I want to change spectrum, a hundred bucks a bulb and there are a number of choices of spectrum/peak locations.
Try doing that with leds. Neither cheap nor easy!
The 315 s and Agro is Philips realizing the horti market for cmh...methinks they realized it and thats why the pulling the retroes...to make more $ from us horti folk
 
It's the same thing that GEL is doing with Cycloptics/Greenbeams. Most manufacturers of any scale aren't going to try and pursue every niche market that their product might fit - it's easier to let some people who know the market put together a package and sell it. They may make a little less margin, but they don't have to learn about the market, or employ and train people for it, etc. In Greenbeams case, they are primarily targeting the educational/research grow chamber retrofits and using their own reflector. In this case, you've got some growers with an entrepreneurial bent that see potential in putting together a package with a third-party reflector.
also worth it to make the bulk sales profits margin can be closer and as you styasted all the other market specific costs the relalbeler must eat
 

tenthirty

Member
Not sure rives:
http://cycloptics.com/ceramatek_ballast
Here they are referring to the 315W, it's stated that dimming affects both lamp life and lumen maintenance, also in the table shown.. 50% dimming reduces lumens from 35121 to 13629 and CRI from 94% to 75%, that's some spectrum change...

If it's true at this point I prefer to continue with 150W Hps, maybe I'll switch to CMHs when I'll have a larger area to play with... at least 4 times bigger and use that 315W bulb at full power

Interesting the 0-10V interface, I've an Arduino chipboard to play with.. natively it has 5V output but it can be easily modded to get 10V.. maybe if I add some temperature and humidity sensors I can rely on it to control lamps and fans and get a semi-automated environment, that would be cool for sure :)

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Not sure rives:
http://cycloptics.com/ceramatek_ballast
Here they are referring to the 315W, it's stated that dimming affects both lamp life and lumen maintenance, also in the table shown.. 50% dimming reduces lumens from 35121 to 13629 and CRI from 94% to 75%, that's some spectrum change...

If it's true at this point I prefer to continue with 150W Hps, maybe I'll switch to CMHs when I'll have a larger area to play with... at least 4 times bigger and use that 315W bulb at full power

Interesting the 0-10V interface, I've an Arduino chipboard to play with.. natively it has 5V output but it can be easily modded to get 10V.. maybe if I add some temperature and humidity sensors I can rely on it to control lamps and fans and get a semi-automated environment, that would be cool for sure
smile.gif
[/FONT]
Here is what Cycloptics has to say.

The data on the Cycloptics website referenced below is from Philips for the non-Agro 315W CMH. I used it because it was all that was available at the time. The GB website will be updated by end of week to reflect the attachment…new images of the PARgrow will be used as shown by examples.

Here is an independent measurement conducted by Conviron of the spectral power of the Elite Agro between 400-800 nm at 100%, 80%, 60%, and 40% of the PAR output of the lamp being driven by the CeramaTek ballast. This performance characteristic was independently measured by Conviron in Winnipeg, Canada using an Apogee Instruments PS-200 spectral radiometer with 1.5 nm resolution.

View attachment PARGrow Web Page Update 4.16.13.pdf
PARgrow 1.jpg
PARgrow 2.jpg
 

rives

Inveterate Tinkerer
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
What do you guys think would yield the best in a dr90:

At this point, I'd recommend the Greenbeams equipment. The two plants that I showed pictures of earlier in the thread got weighed up a couple of days ago. I pulled 10.5 ozs from them of pretty good sized buds - the rest went for topical oil feedstock and/or hash. I've run this strain under PL-Ls, the Lumigrow ES-330, and my hybrid fixture, and have always averaged somewhere from 3.5 to 4 ozs per plant (with not nearly as much tossed out for other uses - I'm sick of trimming that shit). The plants were handled differently this time (numerous toppings, longer veg period, were radically rootbound after several months in beer cups and not very healthy prior to vegging), so it isn't a good direct comparison but I think it's indicative of the 315's potential. Also, this was with the 930 lamp, not the Agro.
 
DNA is the same thing as GEL, though. GEL knows that their Ceramatek line appeals to growers... They'd have no reason to sell to DNA strictly because of a niche market - that they are already involved in.

OK, so putting aside who really owns DNA, we can agree that more than likely it is GEL supplying DNA with the hardware. If you buy from DNA then you are essentially buying from GEL.

Are we to believe that a couple of stoners started DNA? Contacted Philips, got a custom bulb made, sourced out a pre-made ballast or commissioned a company to make a custom ballast - All while being right down the road from GEL? Unlikely in my opinion. I think that GEL and DNA have very close ties. Now you can say that GEL has several other lighting products in their line-up, true... Have you contacted them? Take a look at their contact page. Contacts from NY, Florida, Dubai (lol), etc... Yet their all the same # and go to the same place. In fact, no one ever answers the fucking phone at any of those numbers except the California one, which is how I was placed in touch with a "regional" rep, who happens to be in Idaho. In my opinion, GEL is a company trying to look a lot bigger than they really are. Good for them.

Are their ballasts any good? I don't know, haven't used one and I'm not trying to dispute the quality of their hardware, only that it seems to me that GEL = DNA. This is all my opinion but I think it's a conglomerate. There is nothing unusual or far-fetched about that theory.

All in all, I really don't give a shit about DNA's BS SPDs or GEL as a whole. I'm really in this thread because I'm on the CMH train and that's it. I think GELs prices are laughable. I've received several different price quotes from the rep at GEL. Explains why they don't list a price on their website, they charge whatever they feel like depending on which way the wind is blowing that day.
GEL is not the manufacturer of the "Ceramatek" ballasts, only a re-seller. They are manufactured in Germany. Once again Americans acting like they made something worthwhile these days. Lol
 
Top