C
CTSV
So is a standard HPS better than the CMH for flowering? I have a brand new HPS but it is just your regular plain ol HPS.
depends on who you ask
So is a standard HPS better than the CMH for flowering? I have a brand new HPS but it is just your regular plain ol HPS.
vorsprung, I have a 400wCMH and a 150wHPS in a 2'x2'x63" flower space. It is easily doable.
So is a standard HPS better than the CMH for flowering?
got a question.
right now im running the CMH. my ballast can do both HPS and MH. i have it set to HPS cause thats what was posted it can run on. would there be any difference if it was set to MH?
also would it be better to switch to HPS bulb during flower? i hear that MH makes more leafy buds then HPS....
Be careful running digital sales rep from Phillips bulb said they will blow bulb use magnetic hps......just a word of caution
Be careful running digital sales rep from Phillips bulb said they will blow bulb use magnetic hps......just a word of caution
I have a 400 and a 250 and the 400 is about 6 degree's hotter in my room.the 400w cmh is only a buck or 2 more then the 250w cmh
much more light for your money and I've heard that the 250
and the 400 produce about the same heat is this so?
I personally would use cmh thru your veg and then use HPS for Flower....that said this is CMH thread and some people swear by it...it cant speak from experience just what ive read...i run MH and HPS.....
its way worst with CMH Leafus Maximus