Coughie
Member
Predator mites alone won't work to get rid of broad mites.
This is wrong.
Readers, believe what you wish~
Edit:
I have no idea what studies you're referencing, but I've read many. The idea that I think you're hinting at, is the issue with the predator mites controlling their populations in such a way that they never "finish off" the broad mites / food source. They don't want to starve to death, smart little critters.
But it can be overcome, a few ways.
The one I've suggested previously is with a second order of predators, quaintly about the time the first order is trying to downsize it's population so it doesn't die off completely... BAM! Here comes in the reserve cavalry - and they don't wanna starve either - so it turns into an over-populated predatory scramble for the last broad mites...
Think about it like 100 people trapped on an island and there's 1 coconut tree left... Those coconuts don't last long, no matter who says what or thinks they should be saved for tomorrow.
The other way is with supplemental feeding, so the predatory mites never feel the need to cut back on their breeding.. You can supplementally feed in such a way that they actually increase their predatory breeding, "up to par", because they have the resources to do so... This can take a little longer, the broad mites are still a more rounded nutrition source than any supplemental feedings, but they dont *have* to eat the broad mites, so they can be passed up on..
Do you have salad when you can have candy? But you're having salad if there's only salad, right? (mites + supplemental vs mites)
Last edited: