new english translations...
sheesh..
that verse is not about the 10 commandments but following old law from the torah
you know no menstruating shellfish fondue'
-
ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
armstrong stripped of world titles
- Thread starter lost in a sea
- Start date
new english translations...
sheesh..
that verse is not about the 10 commandments but following old law from the torah
you know no menstruating shellfish fondue'
B
blue green
Yes, that is terrible...
I really didn't know about the sueings before the interview. I didn't really pay much attention to any details, i thought he was a good guy.
He was on such an ego trip, he did some good things, but he did some really bad things, suing people for telling the truth...
He really is messed up.
Thanks for the update, I really should have thought about that before I gave everyone the wrong idea about what we were talking about.
Peace
Sundance
member
Hahahahaha
Brilliant
Additionally, I never lost my temper - I simply lost patience
Got a quote for that ?
You are still a fucking asshole !
Does that 23" trouser snake you so obviously lug around cause you to walk with a slight limp?
Good thing there's no personality traits that you and Lance both share...
a.
He gave the people what they wanted and now they're crucifying him for it.
I wonder if Harrison Bergeron's reality will ever come to pass....
I wonder if Harrison Bergeron's reality will ever come to pass....
I love this site for it's diversity in discussions and how even though we are still allowed to express ourselves there is an unspoken rule that we seperate our discussions into seperate forums, we all seem to agree this is the unity that keeps us together. Internet or not ICMAG is truly a community, one which I am very happy to be part of.
Peace
Peace
Sundance
member
Hahahahaha
You are a moron ... everything you say is beyond stupid
I have said this repeatedly - for the life of you - you dont know when to quit, and STFU
If you were smart - and you have clearly proven your are not anything close to that - you would walk away ass-Fartes
You keep hitting new lows
The irony in your words is amusing. Here's a hint Sundance. I'm getting a chuckle out of this.
You've made it clear this won't be a discussion based on intellect nor reasoned thought as they certainly aren't in your wheelhouse. Nothing beats a willfully ignorant opinion.
ass-tartes, ass-fartes. If I keep kicking the beehive will 24 more letter substitutions fall on out? I'm on the edge of my seat.
a.
lol, you guys need to admit to your use of internet pissing match enhancing drugs! we need to get the doping out of pot forums! live high!
Sundance
member
ass-fartes
Yes
I like that one - if fits your personality perfectly
Like I have said ad-nausea ... for the life of you, you dont know when to quit, or STFU
Me - I have just been toying with you
At this point - you have proven, beyond any reasonable doubt, that you are a mindless idiot and a psycho - incapable of - what did you call it - ah yes ... " intellect nor reasoned thought " - which by the way you would not know if it bitch slapped you in the face
Unfortunately for you - and I know how you love to go on, and on and on - to infinity and beyond ... this little conversation ... has finally run its course
One day - somebody else will say the smallest little thing to you - that you will take as a criticism rightly or wrongly - and this whole process will start all over again for you with somebody else - I have absolutely no doubt about that asshole
Enough of this ... and enough of you
ass-fartes
I deny it! Never once have used IPMEDs.
On second thought...
I only used IPMEDs because my competitors did.
a.
I'll leave you with one parting morsel of wisdom. You wrote it, sweetheart. The irony is delicious.
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?p=2062763#post2062763
post #23
This is NOT about arguing
Its about truth .. right ... correct .. fact .. setting the record straight
Its quite clear - pissed or not .. Bo is very, very wrong on many levels ... and worse .. his statements are wrong .. its clear he does not know which way is up .. and is very wrong to speak for anyone but himself - especially when he does not know what he is talking about
Read my posts on page 1 of this thread
Do you think that because your pissed .. that its ok to lie ? mislead ? ... attempt to bury someone ? ... and that if you do all that - then the other person should apologize ?
That is what your saying
Great product always sells itself ... but there are always assholes out there .. and you cant always please everyone
Wise words.
a.
B
blue green
i think you two should take some ecstacy and get a room.
I am starting to suspect any moment they will start making out. Or they are just taking the thread for a ride, wouldn't be the first time a couple of drama queens hijacked a thread and started punching eachother in the vagina. Why don't we start another thread for bitches where people can carry on like fools while the rest of us try to conduct civil discussion.
Peace
Peace
I've had my fun and am finished. Back to newsworthy events.
Here's the first few intersting paragraphs of an article from the New York Times. Full article is available in link below:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/15/s...stify-against-cycling-officials.html?hp&_r=1&
Acknowledging his doping past has cleared the way for Armstrong to take the next step in trying to mitigate his lifetime ban from Olympic sports. He is planning to testify against several powerful people in the sport of cycling who knew about his doping and possibly facilitated it, said several people with knowledge of the situation.
Armstrong, 41, is planning to testify against officials from the International Cycling Union, the worldwide governing body of cycling, about their involvement with doping in cycling, but he will not testify against other riders, according to the people familiar with his plans.
He is also in discussions with the United States Department of Justice to possibly testify in a federal whistle-blower case. That case involves the cycling team sponsored by the United States Postal Service, and Armstrong would testify against several of the team’s owners, including the investment banker Thom Weisel, and other officials, one person close to the situation said. That person did not want his name published because the case is still open.
Floyd Landis, one of Armstrong’s former teammates, filed the whistle-blower case in 2010 against Armstrong and other principals of the Postal Service team on which he and Armstrong competed together for several years. Landis claimed the team defrauded the government because its riders used performance-enhancing drugs in violation of its sponsorship contract.
Armstrong, who for more than a decade vehemently denied doping, would be willing to testify against the cycling union officials and his former team’s officials because he badly wants to compete in triathlons and running events again. Last fall, he was barred from many of those events because they are sanctioned by organizations that follow the World Anti-Doping Code, the rules under which he is serving his lifetime ban. Armstrong said that lifetime ban was unfair.
He met with United States Anti-Doping Agency officials, including Travis Tygart, the agency’s chief executive, last month to discuss what he needed to do to mitigate his ban. Several people with knowledge of the discussions said Tygart would be willing to reduce Armstrong’s punishment if Armstrong would testify against the people who helped him dope. That would possibly include Pat McQuaid, the president of the cycling union, and Hein Verbruggen, who was the cycling union’s president from 1991 to 2005, a time when doping in the sport was rampant. Verbruggen, who is close with the International Olympic Committee president, Jacques Rogge, is also the cycling union’s honorary president and an honorary member of the I.O.C.
Discussions of joining Landis' whistle-blower suit against the USPS, planning to testify against UCI officials and meeting with USADA's chief to discuss an eight year ban. Depending on how things shake out, triathalons in the fall of 2013 is certainly in the realm of possibility. It will be interesting to see what appearance fee he commands if he competes in sanctioned events again.
a.
That didn't take long at all. Lance tried to get back into competition in the form of master's swimming and was quickly barred from competition from the International Swimming Federation.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/22023732
a.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/22023732
a.
G
greenmatter
he will try to stay in the game one way or another and get told to go away until he winds up on celebrity boxing or dancing with the stars
i bet Tonya Harding takes him down in the third round
i bet Tonya Harding takes him down in the third round
