ANY NIRVANA STRAINS i.b.l.'s ??

[masterlow37]

Are any of the nirvana strains ibl i thought maybe there afghan, bubblicious, cali-o, m.kush, nl or ppp might be ?

 

[Reign of Terror]

you know you make a lot of threads, and somethin tells me, you could search a lot of this info up

but to answer your question, there all f2's

 

[masterlow37]

Im not new to the tree, im new to these computers & websites discovered og about a year before there shutdown and never had the balls to become a member so i joined another site a few weeks back and just this week joined icmag so i sort of went buck wild trying to pick some brains for suggestions to add to everything ive read and allready know. PEACE

 

[Reign of Terror]

ahh, i see...excuse me for my rudeness. well ic's the creme de la creme, good to see you here. and computers can be a prick, but youll get used to it. but yes nirvana's stuff is cheap because theyre f2's of orig genetics

 

[Guest]

why do they have breeders then
there own site says different??
peace
see

 

[glock23]

I would think their Afghani, Chitral and Hindu Kush are IBLs.

 

[Guest]

I could be wrong, but if you make seeds with a brother and sister of..say..an afghani(a pure one..that would be the debate), I believe that it would remain an ibl. like I said..I could be wrong, but I bet you could get stable, true breeding genetics from them.

 

[glock23]

GMB: You're totally right.

 

[chizzleonetime]

i agree with gmb i cant see there skunk1 etc being unstable but i havent really got any experience with nirvana

 

[glock23]

Yeah, their Skunk is probably stabilized now too.

 

[beancounter]

Skunk#1 is the only confirmed IBL I can think of from Nirvana.

Who knows who's Afghan they used to make their seeds, and not all afghans are IBLs, as some have been crossed out.

The Chitral has been crossed to something, it's not pure. Doc Leaf has a good thread on Chitral.

i think most Hindu Kush are IBL, regardless of the company, so Nirvanas could be.

But without knowing exactly who's version they knocked off, it'll be very hard to say which strains are truly IBLs.

 

[Reign of Terror]

i wasnt stating some of there strains werent ibls

but theyre f2's of orig genetics

i can make f2's of DC, you get me?

 

[clearcutter]

Not all Nirvana seeds are f2s. If my memory serves me correctly, i believe a couple are their own crosses and some are other strains crossed with skunk.

 

[Guest]

maybe you should just make on big Q and A thread and edit posts with you new questions.

 

[masterlow37]

So any versions that were originally landraces or i.b.l.'s could still possibly be consistent/low variation . Now for the monkey wrench , I read somewhere that nirvana had/has a super awsome skunk specimen that they had supposably bred to some of there strains best i can remember , its been awhile im probly way off hopefully someone can enlighten me ? I WOULD APPRECIATE IT

 

[masterlow37]

DAMN IM SLOW TWO REPLIES BEFORE I COULD EVEN RESPOND !

 

[Guest]

nirvana mixes SkunK#1 with about everything, so dont expect any pure landraces for 15$

 

[SweetIndica]

Yea, none of them are ibl's. There plants also have alot of variation and look nothing like the ibl's i've seen. For example their afghani is nothing like an ibl/landrace aghani (like seedsmans). Most of their strains are nothing like they say, alot of their indicas look exactly alike and aren't super potent. Their plants vary a ton, i've had some of their supposed pure indicas, and then grow them out and ended up with some very sativa dominant plants that grow tall and wild. A few grows ago, i grew their bubbilicious, white rhino, and northern lights. All of the mostly indica plants buds looked almost exactly the same, but the plants varied alot. None were super potent and looked nothing like they should.

 

[ganjalf]

nirvana mixes SkunK#1 with about everything, so dont expect any pure landraces for 15$

Wouldn't that be TFD? As far as I know all their strains are min. 50% Sk#1 exept for their O Haze.

@RoT: NO, YOU CAN'T MAKE DC F2'S. Yes it would be possible to make your own DC beans, but if you insist to call them F2, it just shows how clueless you are!

I still remember the first post of yours that I read(on OG). You claimed that anyone not being satisfied with Nirvana beans were lausy growers. "Totally the fault of the grower", or something like that...

How about popping some beans, instead of sitting here talking trash?

 

[Reign of Terror]

Wouldn't that be TFD? As far as I know all their strains are min. 50% Sk#1 exept for their O Haze.

@RoT: NO, YOU CAN'T MAKE DC F2'S. Yes it would be possible to make your own DC beans, but if you insist to call them F2, it just shows how clueless you are!

I still remember the first post of yours that I read(on OG). You claimed that anyone not being satisfied with Nirvana beans were lausy growers. "Totally the fault of the grower", or something like that...

How about popping some beans, instead of sitting here talking trash?

if you want to get anal and scientific, another f-generation of dc. either way, it was very obvious with what i was trying to convey.

and about the og comment, prove me wrong about nirvana. seems to me that theyre the highest selling seedbank on SB. not to mention all the satisfied reports.