Myth #4: Under the initiative, anyone 21 or over will be allowed to grow marijuana in a 5’x5’ space.
[11] Plus, if you rent, you will be required to obtain permission from your landlord—which they may be unwilling to grant since doing so will subject them to forfeiture by the federal government.
That's not the way I read it. Lets look at prop 19 shall we:
Notice how I bold the "may" in the above. The way I read this, is that a landlord can update your lease on the next renewal that specifically doesn't give you permission to grow. The way I read it, it doesn't mean you have to get permission.(ii) Cultivate, on private property by the owner, lawful occupant, or other lawful resident or guest of the private property owner or lawful occupant, cannabis plants for personal consumption only, in an area of not more than twenty-five square feet per private residence or, in the absence of any residence, the parcel. Cultivation on leased or rented property may be subject to approval from the owner of the property. Provided that, nothing in this section shall permit unlawful or unlicensed cultivation of cannabis on any public lands.
Myth #5: Adults 21 and over will be able to possess up to one ounce of marijuana without penalty.
Fact: Perhaps the most ironic piece of the puzzle is that the initiative to legalize marijuana actually makes it illegal to possess marijuana if it was purchased anywhere other than the very few licensed dispensaries in the state.[12] So if this initiative passes, better not get caught carrying marijuana you bought off your neighbor, your current dealer, or at a party; you could get arrested. And if you do buy from a licensed dispensary, better keep your receipts, because the burden of proof will be on you. Not only is this inconvenient, but it sets the industry up to be monopolized.
This is an assumption. How do you know how many dispensaries will be licensed?
Also, your point about the burden of proof is incorrect here. It will become lawful to possess up to 1oz of Marijuana outside of your home. Lets read the prop 19 again:
Notice the words I have in bold. You can share all you want (up to 1 oz at a time).(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is lawful and shall not be a public offense under California law for any person 21 years of age or older to:
(i) Personally possess, process, share, or transport not more than one ounce of cannabis, solely for that individual’s personal consumption, and not for sale.
Also, TODAY f you buy Cannabis from your neighbor, dealer, or at a party, you could get arrested. I still don't see the passage of Prop 19 will be any different (in this aspect) then it is today. Except, that cops will most likely stop trying to bust people for Cannabis because it will become too difficult to enforce.
What’s more, if your city decides not to tax cannabis, then buying and selling marijuana in the city limits would remain illegal. You would be permitted to possess and consume marijuana, but you would be required to travel to another city that taxes cannabis to buy it.[13] This is a move towards decreased, not increased, access. And since the initiative is so ambiguous that cities are destined to be tied up in a legal quagmire over how to interpret it, many local governments might find it simpler just to opt-out and send its citizens elsewhere. Indeed, 129 cities did just that with medical marijuana, banning it outright, while still others have established moratoriums against dispensaries. In fact, of the entire state, only the city of Oakland has endorsed the initiative. A vote for the initiative will therefore not ensure local access to purchase marijuana legally.
Right now cities and counties are already banning Dispensaries. This is TODAY. Yep, under Prop 215. Even if what you say above is true, how would it be any different then today?