-
ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
Wow, look at this huge bust
- Thread starter Baddog40
- Start date
WoW poor little seedlings being valued at $1,000 each or better
north carolina cops that board eh
north carolina cops that board eh
Yep. Some NC cops aren't very bright either. But that's no shocker. In 1978, a friend and three others were popped with a small bag. None of them claimed the bag so all four were arrested and given a court date.
The evidence didn't make it to court. During the arrest, neither of the two cops knew how to spell marijuana on the citation. Instead, they wrote "green vegetable material." The judge dropped charges due to no evidence and lack of specificity on the report. This isn't small town. These ferks are major metro cops lol.
WOW HA HA HA HA ,,,, hes big time
B
BigMo
What's really gonna hurt this dude is that tax they are going to impose on him. I had it done to me and it is unconstitutional.
Wow, how many times have we heard in these threads "well he had xxx number of plants which is obviously way too many for personal use. Dealers deserve what they get" type of bullshit. Yeah, this guy was obviously Pablo Escobar, lol.
well yes and no, indirectly yes, however, they say these massive numbers because if they have a multi million dollar massive 50 seedling bust (he needs to move his lights closer IMO, look at that etiolation! lol) they get a bigger fatter budget next year (aka paycheck) to "battle these kingpins", which in turn makes them feel like they have a 11 inch cock.
The USA wants "transparency" for its wasteful government spending,... this is a primo example of the dumbfuckery.
actually they cant call it "Marijuana" because what if it is infact celery tops? The cop knows exactly what it is, believe me, they call it "green leafy matter(or material)" until it can be "analyzed" (which you pay for after court is all done of course, usually a few hundo
If you're smoking something that could be mistaken for celery tops, you need another dealer. I've heard some pretty dumb comments on IC but yours is cherry. Did you land on your head when you last touched down? jk
Almost sounds like a dumb joke:
Did you hear the one about the four dumb fuckers gettin busted, puffin a number behind the bowling alley?
The cops were smart enough to know what pot looks and smells like, but were too dumb to spell marijuana on the ticket.
The dumbest fuck says to the other three, "don't worry, this shit might be celery tops." (drum/splash)
Sorry, forgot to laugh. That could have been a scene in "Dumb and Dumber."
Anybody care to chime?
http://www.americansforsafeaccess.org/downloads/AG_Guidelines.pdf
link for the cali guidelines
way to be the most ignorant fuck I've met on here?
thank you for turning an OBVIOUS 'for instance' example into a literal translation, I'm sure your logic skills are amazing.
you think cops can magically deduce that some green plant matter is cannabis? what about little crumbs in your floorboard? They didn't write cannabis or marijuana because they cannot factually write what they seized until it has been 'analyzed', EVEN IF EVERY INDICATION says its pot.
you can have a full on fucking plant and it wont be called "cannabis" (i'm talking officially calling it that on paperwork, of course the cops are gonna call it pot when they are walking thru your door to the evidence tech car).
I know it will be called "green leafy matter" in any police report UNTIL it has been to the lab because I've been there... twice. You think some cop carrying a potted plant with serrated pretty little leaves that look EXACTLY like pot is gonna write "green leafy matter" if he could write marijuana?
maybe youre the dumb fuck that got dropped on your head.
you really think a COP who went through months upon MONTHS of training... doesn't know how to spell marijuana? (not like they have a computer in the car with the exact civil or criminal code to help them write citations or anything)
link for the cali guidelines
way to be the most ignorant fuck I've met on here?
thank you for turning an OBVIOUS 'for instance' example into a literal translation, I'm sure your logic skills are amazing.
you think cops can magically deduce that some green plant matter is cannabis? what about little crumbs in your floorboard? They didn't write cannabis or marijuana because they cannot factually write what they seized until it has been 'analyzed', EVEN IF EVERY INDICATION says its pot.
you can have a full on fucking plant and it wont be called "cannabis" (i'm talking officially calling it that on paperwork, of course the cops are gonna call it pot when they are walking thru your door to the evidence tech car).
I know it will be called "green leafy matter" in any police report UNTIL it has been to the lab because I've been there... twice. You think some cop carrying a potted plant with serrated pretty little leaves that look EXACTLY like pot is gonna write "green leafy matter" if he could write marijuana?
maybe youre the dumb fuck that got dropped on your head.
you really think a COP who went through months upon MONTHS of training... doesn't know how to spell marijuana? (not like they have a computer in the car with the exact civil or criminal code to help them write citations or anything)
What's that? Present-day cali? I guess "1978" doesn't register. Neither does your assumption of cali. Wow, I was just kidding ("jk") earlier but you really are a tard.
Nope, just hurt your feelings for saying dumb stuff. Is that why I got the negative k? I stated fact which you contradicted in error. Maybe you should read a little closer.
Logic aside, you're splitting hairs that have dick to do with anything I posted.
Yes, if it's real marijuana. Especially when the cops caught em in the act of blazing and found more in the car. Your idea of official confirmation doesn't apply here, only to your sanctimonious rant.
What about little crumbs in your head?
Wrong again. When the lawyer objected to "green vegetable material" on the citation, the judge asked the cop(s) to explain. One of the arresting officers said and I quote, "We didn't know how to spell marijuana." I'll say it again, "The judge dropped charges due to no evidence and lack of specificity on the report." That's not anybodys logic, it's court record. Maybe you can take up your link with the judge. Furthermore, only after the defense attys objection to no evidence and "green vegetable material" did the judge throw the case. This would lead somebody with average logic skills to deduce a potential guilty verdict minus the lawyer. While your link doesn't apply, your idea that cops and judges always follow the law verbatim is dumb. Dumb, de dumb dumb.
You're starting to fade on me. Maybe you should rethink your extra-curricular activities. You're getting busted so much you think you know what happened over here in '78. Were you even born yet? How old are you? Wait.... I don't care.Nah, just the one bustin your balls for dumb irrelevance.
Are you still here?
I guess they could have towed an AS400 on a trailer...but no, they didn't have a computer. Not until '85/'86.
If I could give you "dumb" rep, you certainly deserve it.
