People are trying to capitalize on cannabis by providing the infrastructure often sorely lacking by haphazard growers.
Am I missing something?
Not being argumentative here, I guess I just don't get the issue. Most people would rather have their wine made by a licensed and inspected winery than some asshole with a bathtub and some rotten grapes. Same can be said for weed is my hunch.
It feels like I should be upset about something here, but I can't place it.
Is the cannabis market supposed to be somehow handled differently than every other commodity we trade? I don't get it.
You're right about that. Generally speaking though...how many wineries have to rent out trailers to run any aspect of their operation? To the bigger point, a growing operation that has to rent a trailer to grow in, at the end of the day probably has less resources than some competitors. I personally don't see 53ft rental growing trailers as the next big thing.
I don't know why people have issues with the companies ideas. It looks like they are just taking advantage of people in iffy situations. That's where the issue is, not with the idea of renting trailers, but how they implemented the idea.