What's new

What If The Pyramids Are Capstones - Structures Found Below The Pyramids

T

TanzanianMagic

Well-known member
Veteran
1. If it is true that there are long, 0.6 km pillars below the pyramids, does that make the pyramids capstones, and more like the Irish Round Towers?

1744040412456.png


Source

1744040846864.png


Source

2. What were those pillars intended to bring to the surface?

Electricity from the Telluric Currents of the earth? Is that the purpose of those spirals, to bring up electricity?

3. The idea of pyramids has always been that they spread down energy from above.

What if they were intended to concentrate energy from below?

4. Also before the modern Egyptian government got hold of it, the Nile used to run under or near the Pyramids.

That ended with the damming of the Nile. But the Pyramids used to be in a place to influence the waters of the Nile.

5. Phil Callahan wrote extensively about paramagnetism and Irish Round Towers.

I wonder what he would say about this new find.
 
P

Phytoplankton

Active member
Interesting conjecture. Still considered pretty much a "fringe theory". As far as the Irish towers, there has been no scientific corroboration of the theory. The alleged pillars are not present in all pyramids, since some sit on bedrock. The Ahramat Branch of the Nile used to flow much closer to the pyramids, but never under them, because the pyramids are on the Giza Plateau well above the river. The Ahramat Branch of the Nile was used to bring workers, building materials, and goods to the area, however over time the branch shifted and later dried up, so if the pyramids were there to influence the Nile, they did a lousy job of it! The Ahramat branch shifted/dried up naturally about 3-4000 years ago and has nothing to do with the Egyptian government. The Aswan dam, was completed in 1960. (remember the debunked old broscience about putting a razor blade under a pyramid shape to keep it sharp forever?)
 
Last edited:
T

TanzanianMagic

Well-known member
Veteran
When you don't know what you're talking about and only want to 'debunk' or 'discredit', it's best not to comment.

1744058605980.png

Source

UPDATE

Identification of this photograph, from Fire In The Middle, by James Ernest Brown:

A photograph from the book titled "Around The World With A Camera: Special War Edition Photographs From The Battlefields", published in 1919. This Hun bi-plane aircraft was on a bombing mission from Turkey. The picture shows the Nile overflowering close to the Great Pyramid.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
L

limegreenlimey

Active member
Ground penetrating radar does not produce accurate readings beyond a few metres. The images that sparked this story are misleading, to put it politely. Making up esoteric myths about the pyramids is ducking the simple truth about them: they were constructed using lots of slaves. Much is unknown about ancient Egypt but there's nothing very mysterious or unusual about building a sacred mountain using a pile of rocks.
 
Last edited:
P

Phytoplankton

Active member
TanzanianMagic said:
When you don't know what you're talking about and only want to 'debunk' or 'discredit', it's best not to comment.

View attachment 19181945
Source
Click to expand...
So your saying that the Egyptian government caused the Ahramat branch of the Nile to change course/dry up 3000-4000 years ago by building a dam in 1960 that’s about 170 miles downstream of Giza?
 
Last edited:
T

TanzanianMagic

Well-known member
Veteran
Notice that none of these comments have anything to do with the original post.

This thread is not for educating you about Ancient Egypt.

For instance:

- There is no evidence the Pyramids were built by 'slaves'.
- The blocks of the Pyramids are not rocks, they're concrete. The tools to carve them, move them, and perfectly align them do not exist today, nor did they exist 4,500 years ago.
- Lastly, Phytoplankton, who only joined a year ago, keeps sawing on about "the Ahramat branch of the Nile to change course/dry up 3000-4000 years ago", when I posted a photograph of a biplane with German markings flying over the Pyramids, while the Nile flows near it with viewing distance. That's from the 1910s/1920s.

1744099350400.png


If the comments don't return to the original topic, I'll simply start a new topic that only I will be able to comment on.
 
Genghis Kush.

Genghis Kush.

Well-known member
TanzanianMagic said:
When you don't know what you're talking about and only want to 'debunk' or 'discredit', it's best not to comment.

View attachment 19181945
Source
Click to expand...
TanzanianMagic said:
1. If it is true that there are long, 0.6 km pillars below the pyramids, does that make the pyramids capstones, and more like the Irish Round Towers?

View attachment 19181787

Source

View attachment 19181804

Source

2. What were those pillars intended to bring to the surface?

Electricity from the Telluric Currents of the earth? Is that the purpose of those spirals, to bring up electricity?

3. The idea of pyramids has always been that they spread down energy from above.

What if they were intended to concentrate energy from below?

4. Also before the modern Egyptian government got hold of it, the Nile used to run under or near the Pyramids.

That ended with the damming of the Nile. But the Pyramids used to be in a place to influence the waters of the Nile.

5. Phil Callahan wrote extensively about paramagnetism and Irish Round Towers.

I wonder what he would say about this new find.
Click to expand...
stop watching dumb youtube videos

this is the Botany section
 
Last edited:
T

TanzanianMagic

Well-known member
Veteran
OldOneEye said:
Wow, that comment is lame. If you can't handle opposing thoughts, ideas then it is best to remain silent.
Click to expand...
What 'opposing thoughts'? Why would I be looking for 'opposing thoughts'?

The issue was paramagnetism, buildings, the pyramids and Irish round towers.

Did you see any responses dealing with any of those topics?

None. All of this activity is off-topic.
 
Ca++

Ca++

Well-known member
TanzanianMagic said:
Notice that none of these comments have anything to do with the original post.

This thread is not for educating you about Ancient Egypt.

For instance:

- There is no evidence the Pyramids were built by 'slaves'.
- The blocks of the Pyramids are not rocks, they're concrete. The tools to carve them, move them, and perfectly align them do not exist today, nor did they exist 4,500 years ago.
- Lastly, Phytoplankton, who only joined a year ago, keeps sawing on about "the Ahramat branch of the Nile to change course/dry up 3000-4000 years ago", when I posted a photograph of a biplane with German markings flying over the Pyramids, while the Nile flows near it with viewing distance. That's from the 1910s/1920s.

View attachment 19182192

If the comments don't return to the original topic, I'll simply start a new topic that only I will be able to comment on.
Click to expand...
Are you familiar with shutter speed. That plane has a stationary prop.
Ever looked at a sun dial? The pyramids are lit from a different angle to the plane.

I have a great 'get rich quick' scheme I will PM you about
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top