Wait, what?
His name was not Carl or Karl, it was Chaim Hirschel Mordechaiit's "Karl," dimwit. thereby proving you know fuck little other than you don't like his philosophy for reasons which you don't understand and you can't explain. if you are going to express an opinion, it is best to research & learn some facts about that which you want to complain.
Plotted is a better term. It is not like Chaim, or Karl as you like to call him, was a prophet or anything. He merely planned for his cousins and their friends in usury/banking to finance a red revolution against the Monarchy of Russia and establish a state with their own central bank, like their US counterpart. The dissidents and opposition they founded in masonry. All communist idols belonged to this bourgeoisie fraternity.His economic analysis was so correct that it predicted how capitalism will consume itself and create it's own dissidents and opposition. That's all that matters.
Karl was right.
This is what happens when you teach mythology and not history.After doing some reading it appears that Carl Marx is most definitely a racist, especially by the standards put forth by the left. Let's take a look at some of the things this commie said.
“The Jewish nigger Lassalle who, I’m glad to say, is leaving at the end of this week, has happily lost another 5,000 talers in an ill-judged speculation. The chap would sooner throw money down the drain than lend it to a ‘friend,’ even though his interest and capital were guaranteed. … It is now quite plain to me—as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify—that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a nigger). Now, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow’s importunity is also nigger-like.” Karl Marx, “The Russian Menace to Europe,” 1853
Tremaux “proved that the common Negro type is the degenerate form of a much higher one … a very significant advance over Darwin.” Karl Marx, letter to Friedrich Engels, August 7, 1866
“Without slavery, North America, the most progressive of countries, would be transformed into a patriarchal country. Wipe out North America from the map of the world and you will have anarchy— the complete decay of modern commerce and civilization. Abolish slavery and you will have wiped America off the map of nations.” Karl Marx, “The Poverty of Philosophy,” 1847
So if George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ulysses S. Grant, and Theodore Roosevelt must fall, why not the fathers of communism, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels?
when you have no choice but to participate in a game designed to keep you on the sidelines, enthusiasm for playing tends to wane...good thing karl marx wrote books about and is known for economics and capitalism and not race.
and now black americans are some of the most anti capitalist group of americans in the country. there are marxist parties in the continent of africa.
sweet.
After doing some reading it appears that Carl Marx is most definitely a racist, especially by the standards put forth by the left. Let's take a look at some of the things this commie said.
“The Jewish nigger Lassalle who, I’m glad to say, is leaving at the end of this week, has happily lost another 5,000 talers in an ill-judged speculation. The chap would sooner throw money down the drain than lend it to a ‘friend,’ even though his interest and capital were guaranteed. … It is now quite plain to me—as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify—that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a nigger). Now, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow’s importunity is also nigger-like.” Karl Marx, “The Russian Menace to Europe,” 1853
Tremaux “proved that the common Negro type is the degenerate form of a much higher one … a very significant advance over Darwin.” Karl Marx, letter to Friedrich Engels, August 7, 1866
“Without slavery, North America, the most progressive of countries, would be transformed into a patriarchal country. Wipe out North America from the map of the world and you will have anarchy— the complete decay of modern commerce and civilization. Abolish slavery and you will have wiped America off the map of nations.” Karl Marx, “The Poverty of Philosophy,” 1847
So if George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Ulysses S. Grant, and Theodore Roosevelt must fall, why not the fathers of communism, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels?
And let's not even get into homophobia: I don't think much thought was given at that time to the rights of non-heterosexuals....An easier game to play would be to ask who WAS NOT racist in the 19th century.
Racism doesn't always mean not liking all ethnic groups. I know white people who really dislike black people, but consider mexicans hard working family people, and think Asians are smarter then everyone. Either way I don't give a fuck about Marxism, it's not even close to something I would be interested in learning about. This thread was intended to point out hypocrisy, not a debate about Marxism itself.Yes, I believe that Marx and (more) Engels shared the dominant Eurocentric racism of the time. It is a well-known cliché, discussed and criticized by later Marxism.
That did not take away, that in spite of all the racist comments and jokes behind his back, Marx accepted willingly in his house and gatherings a half Spanish born in Cuba, whose maternal grandparents, a Jamaican Amerindian and a miserable black Haitian day laborer, had emigrated to Spanish Cuba in search of a better future.
In Spanish "racial jargon", a "cuarterón" (son of a white and a mulatto).
And who would end up being Marx's son-in-law, btw.
Racism doesn't always mean not liking all ethnic groups. I know white people who really dislike black people, but consider mexicans hard working family people, and think Asians are smarter then everyone. Either way I don't give a fuck about Marxism, it's not even close to something I would be interested in learning about. This thread was intended to point out hypocrisy, not a debate about Marxism itself.
Maybe you should. Then you'd be able to determine for yourself if all those people who you trust who call something "communist" or "Marxist" or "socialist" are lying to you or not.Racism doesn't always mean not liking all ethnic groups. I know white people who really dislike black people, but consider mexicans hard working family people, and think Asians are smarter then everyone. Either way I don't give a fuck about Marxism, it's not even close to something I would be interested in learning about. This thread was intended to point out hypocrisy, not a debate about Marxism itself.
Y ni entremos en homofobia: no creo que en ese momento se pensara mucho en los derechos de los no heterosexuales....
I'm not quite sure how you got that out of what I said.He should study Marxism so he can get his linguistics right? Only marxists know the truth? I doubt anybody here is that deep into it. It just sounds good to those who feel oppressed for one silly reason or another. Mom made them get a job.