WaittillIdie
Member
I mean seriously 50 plants at once,amazing. You grow out one big one during the summer and use it all year. Saving a couple buds here in there for a long special cure till you get a nice cured stash built up.
I mean seriously 50 plants at once,amazing. You grow out one big one during the summer and use it all year. Saving a couple buds here in there for a long special cure till you get a nice cured stash built up.
For the time being, the State is still allowing extended counts. They've tried to tighten this up but the last try a few months ago went nowhere. Keep in mind that these extended counts for medical came about as an addendum when the >medical< dispensaries were "legitimized" and are not a part of the original wording of Amendment 20...therefore, these specific rules can be changed at any time.
Getting an extended count has not been a problem for a lot of folks. Whether a person can get these numbers depends entirely on the doctor you see or how sick you can prove you are. Keep in mind that medical protection here offers an affirmative defense for you to argue your need but it doesn't guarantee, and has never guaranteed, that you will not end up in court. As a result, getting the count from a reputable doctor who will SHOW UP in court to defend your medical need if needed is definitely THE MOST important thing about finding a doctor. (at any level of involvement in the program)
50 outside? I'm not sure there's any legal restrictions on "locked and enclosed" in A20 as there are in A64. All I know is that years ago (2006?) when we had the GH and the teenagers in the neighborhood helped themselves and brought the cops to the house (through other circumstances, which is how it almost always goes down) the cops never said anything about us growing outside except "it probably wasn't the smartest move". LOL.
IMO, it would all depend on where you lived. In the city...LOL. 50 plants would be a magnet for every meth/crackhead and pot low life within 10 miles. In the sticks, if the deer and the bugs didn't eat it, and nobody found it, and it didn't snow/frost/FREEZE it on the stick and turn it to dust before it finished.... you might be able to make it work.
A64 guarantees that you won't end up in state court when in compliance with public possession & personal growing provisions. The chances of ending up in federal court are also nil. None of them will even go there w/o solid proof of dealing or sizeable transport off property. As you've offered, it becomes an issue of what you want & need, also the size of your cojones.
At 65, I've come to regard discretion as the better part of valor, don't take chances that offer me little advantage. If I want to grow more, I'll just become a better grower, get more out of our 6 plant quota.
Here in CO, the marijuana war is basically over. Well, for anybody willing to let it be over. We won. Not absolutely everything. Respect for recreational users & truly personal growers is the biggest win of all, a profound shift in public sentiment from when I first got high back in 1967. It's a big change from MMJ as well, although people involved in that scene may have trouble recognizing that change for what it is.
That sounds like a nice law. It's like a different world over here. Too bad every state does not have this law written in. They still have laws from 1937 in a lot of states. That's why it might take a lot more states 10-20 years to implement these laws.
I don't even think the war is over in Colorado. Arn't cities outside Boulder and other places that are legal waging war on there fellow towns, they are called dry cities. I think California's war is still ongoing. In some places there you can't grow and there is alot of other rules in some counties in California. Parts of Texas may never become legal lol.
Hello Jhhnn? It sounds like you don't do medical so this is all speculation on your part about the 50 plants thing unless someone else can confirm it. Do you know anyone growing 50 plants outside? You act like you can just walk into the doc and convince him you need 50 plants like it's a done deal which I am not so sure. Also sounds like alot of hoops to go through and there is no grantee so I don't know but it would be worth if it was a success. I'd rather do large outdoor because it saves on the power bill and I would like to cure some all year till next summer also.
Jhhnn, you're playing both sides of the fence. On one hand you talk shit about the grey market in California and OTOH you claim that lack of penalties equates to legality.
Any cop could see your outdoor grow, of 6 plants, and tear it down and arrest you because it is,in his eyes, a violation of A64. It may get thrown out in court...
I think it is made clear hoop houses are not legal under A64, and if vinyl plastic siding counts as "enclosed and locked" I will be completely shocked.
EDIT: I guess "enclosed and locked" could mean a 10 foot fence and locked gates, but I somehow feel if you are within a quarter mileof anyone else that ssuddenly the smell alone would be considered to be "conducted publicly." Its completely grey area. To claim it is "legal" to grow outdoors because there are no "penalties" is absurd. A64 clearly states "enclosed and locked" to say that equates to legal outdoor growing is such a stretch. At least in CA there are precedents already set for most of the "grey area". I certainly wouldn't want to be the precedent set, and the one that goes to jail, for growing 6 plants outdoors...
Again...is anyone going house to house and checking if residents >only< have 6 plants and no more? The same thing can easily be said with sq ft limitations you want imposed upon everyone. Who would check to see the garden wasn't 6 x 12 x 8? Seriously?
the State has it covered with State statutes for distribution/etc. for those who play outside the set rules. They know folks are growing in residences and they have no clue how much, and they know folks are gifting and selling as well because they have to see the massive listings of OPEN sales on craigslist for weed/shatter/hash/edibles/etc by unlicensed folks. I bet the Feds see it too...
Oh, my.
I don't want that. I'm saying that would be more effective at accomplishing the goal of a "6 plant regulation."
However, one solution to the "problem" the Feds see could/would be to eliminate "6 plant regulation" altogether.
They don't need to raid your grow to get you. They just need to raid your bank accounts.
It might e more effective...if they could come for NO REASON.
If it were to come in at all, most folks would be spending it on daily living expenses/etc.
right out of the gate. (paying taxes along the way on purchases and pumping $$ into the economy)
Next you'll be saying "they will track all of your cash purchases"
As far as them taking away our grow rights... LOL...gonna be a huge fight in court between the State/People and the fed should anyone try such a stunt.
And seriously...do you think them saying "you can't grow" means folks are not gonna do it ? When has the Fed stopped anything from happening in the world of drugs on such a scale...or at all for that matter?
Has anyone here had trouble finding drugs of all kinds over the last 45 years or so, all of which are federally illegal?
Budtang, your trolling is not going to get any of us against legalization. Your efforts are laughable. You just pointed to someone else's incorrect speculations as if they were fact.
You keep bouncing back and forth between nonsensical arguments and act as if you want us all to agree that your taxman should be checking our homes for that seventh plant otherwise we are "fucking over the children"...
meanwhile you *say* that you wanna grow all you can out of your house for profit with a "voluntary tax system"...
Please point to any single topic under governmental control and taxation that is voluntary....
you don't get to look in our homes and we do not want your inspections.
Try again. Show us WHERE folks are going down...not the "it could happen if mom lets me play in the street" kinda shit.