Hey folks, long time lurker first time poster.
I wanted to chime in on CO laws here because things aren't as cut and dried as many seem to think. Ever since amendment 20 in CO, cannabis related arrests have increased sharply and have maintained very high rates.
http://www.regulatemarijuana.org/sites/default/files/marp_-_colorado_marijuana_arrest_report.pdf
How amendment 64 changes that, I don't know.
People can and do get arrested here all the time while thinking they are compliant with the state statutes.
With regard to growing under 20/64, it's not as simple as many people have asserted. For example, "growing on your own land" can be illegal. In CO it is illegal to grow outdoors. Amendment 64 or otherwise. On top of that, there are specific requirements to be compliant, not the least of which is, as already mentioned, plant count.
Aside from that though, the grow must be indoors. It must be in a locked area of the structure with restricted access. The indoor facility must either meet state licensing regulations, or be a residence. If you are not growing indoors in your residence, under these rules, you can and will be charged for cultivation. Those laws still exist, the only difference is the limits by which the statutes are defined. Possession, cultivation, transfer, and transportation of cannabis are still governed by Colorado criminal statutes.
On top of that, there are rules about children in the home, their ages, location with regard to bus lines and schools, and also there is the fact that a property owner (if you're leasing) can say that you're restricted from growing cannabis. This does not infringe on one's state constitutional rights because in amendment 64 exists a provision for property owners to disallow growing. If you grow anyway at a property that has specifically restricted it, you can be criminally charged, not to mention are subject to litigation by the property owner.
Many times, legal growers are arrested here. As a matter of fact, several "legal" grows get busted every day here. While it's true that courts have not recently been prosecuting growers that are within the limits, often police at your grow means that an individual officer makes a decision about whether you are legal or not. Because the laws are still ambiguous especially for police, one is subject to the individual officer's perspective (although I think this will change in the future) which can and does result in arrests for perfectly legal grows.
While this is not the norm, I do know a red card carrying medical patient that has been arrested several times for simple possession, every time within state limits. He has been to jail, booked, the case gets dropped, and they even give him his cannabis back. Nevertheless, he has been subject to arrest and scrutiny (even if avoiding convictions) while being a red card holder carrying an amount that someone without a card should be allowed to have.
As such, it's important to treat any grow as if it were illegal. You would not want to find out how well the courts uphold the law and have to rely upon statutes to avoid prison.
Hope this helps!
A64 changes a lot of that. Read it, particularly section 3-
http://www.regulatemarijuana.org/s/regulate-marijuana-alcohol-act-2012
3b clarifies -
POSSESSING, GROWING, PROCESSING, OR TRANSPORTING NO MORE THAN SIX MARIJUANA PLANTS, WITH THREE OR FEWER BEING MATURE, FLOWERING PLANTS, AND POSSESSION OF THE MARIJUANA PRODUCED BY THE PLANTS ON THE PREMISES WHERE THE PLANTS WERE GROWN, PROVIDED THAT THE GROWING TAKES PLACE IN AN ENCLOSED, LOCKED SPACE, IS NOT CONDUCTED OPENLY OR PUBLICLY, AND IS NOT MADE AVAILABLE FOR SALE.
It does not specifically exclude outdoor growing. Interpretation is still an open question. Restrictions about home growing are limited to plant counts & locked enclosed space provisions. Kids & schools no longer matter. Your house is locked, right? The smell of marijuana, burning or growing, is no longer grounds for a state level search warrant, either. I have yet to find any penalty attached to growing outdoors, other than confiscation, and I've tried to find it.
Red card holders have always been in a grey area. Some people are just Cop magnets, too. Denver police, anyway, have been well schooled wrt the provisions of A64. Baked half out of your mind walking down the street with less than an ounce? Bong in your backpack? Got ID & no warrants? Deal with cops calmly & respectfully? Go in peace, my son. Have a nice day, officer. That does not include operating a vehicle while intoxicated.
Growing in rentals is not a criminal matter, provided that plant count limits are observed. It's a civil matter, between the grower & landlord. The worst they can do is evict you. In the past, if they ratted you out to the cops, you were busted. Today, the cops are out of the picture if plant counts are legal.
They might even obtain a warrant on a landlord's testimony, but if the plant counts are right, they'll leave with nothing. You could be sitting on a pound of homegrown, and they can't legally touch it or bust you for it. There is no home possession limit for bud that you plausibly could have grown in your home. That does not include 100 lbs of Mexibrick.
A64 is an enormous change, one very favorable to home growers. Know your shit & stay legal to stay free.