What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

uv reflective paint

Diffuse UV would penetrate the canopy better than directional line of sight UV is my thought

Ya agree but i wonder if the puny output from reptile bulbs would take any meaningful advantage of the uv reflective surfaces.

The single 4' t5 plainly has an effect on the canopy in my setup.
 

Shmavis

Being-in-the-world
They claim 400ft2 coverage per gallon. That's 49 cents per ft2. Orca film on Amazon is 60.50 for a 4.5'x25' roll. 53 cents per ft2 so comparable to that cost wise

It is extremely expensive for paint though. I about fell out of my chair at the price too. But decided it was the best choice for my goals.

Nice breakdown. Always helps to put things in perspective.

If the numbers hold (coverage & reflectivity), then that cost isn’t as offensive as it first seems.
 

subrovka

Member
under terrarium owners, this UV lamp is highly recommended:
http://www.amazon.com/ULTRA-VITALUX-OSRAM-MEDICAL-TANNING/dp/B003XVSWP8
(pretty expensive though.. these bulb costs only 40€/45$ in my area..)
the spectrum is close to sun light in the highlands, the output is very powerful and stimulates the vitamin d3 synthesis of reptiles even from distances up to 1m.

i tried it on myself, you def get tanned from this one by just sitting about 1m next to it for 20-30 min..

these reptile CFL bulbs are a waste of time and money, as their output in UV-B is way to low..it would effect reptiles only from short distances of maybe 20cm(so maybe ok for very small terrariums/animals). and plants, especially cannabis, can take even more UV-B than most animals.

http://www.uvguide.co.uk/lightingsurveyintro.htm
http://www.uromastyx-ocellata.de/?id=wissenswertes/uvbeleuchtung
 

Attachments

  • UV_Guide_UK_-_Ultraviolet_Light_for_Reptiles_-_2005_Reptile_Lighting_Survey.jpg
    UV_Guide_UK_-_Ultraviolet_Light_for_Reptiles_-_2005_Reptile_Lighting_Survey.jpg
    47.9 KB · Views: 26
  • www_uromastyx-ocellata_de.jpg
    www_uromastyx-ocellata_de.jpg
    82.1 KB · Views: 23
Last edited:
under terrarium owners, this UV lamp is highly recommended:
http://www.amazon.com/ULTRA-VITALUX-OSRAM-MEDICAL-TANNING/dp/B003XVSWP8
(pretty expensive though.. these bulb costs only 40€/45$ in my area..)
the spectrum is close to sun light in the highlands, the output is very powerful and stimulates the vitamin d3 synthesis of reptiles even from distances up to 1m.

i tried it on myself, you def get tanned from this one by just sitting about 1m next to it for 20-30 min..

these reptile CFL bulbs are a waste of time and money, as their output in UV-B is way to low..it would effect reptiles only from short distances of maybe 20cm(so maybe ok for very small terrariums/animals). and plants, especially cannabis, can take even more UV-B than most animals.

http://www.uvguide.co.uk/lightingsurveyintro.htm
http://www.uromastyx-ocellata.de/?id=wissenswertes/uvbeleuchtung
Just 3w uvb on that bulb also all that heat would not be my friend.
Did you try it with any plants?
 

subrovka

Member
yes i´m using it 90mins per day and the heat is not an issue as the most heat is radiated from the backside and the socket of the lamp.

3W of UV-B is a lot if your plants obtain that radiation.
also, that declaration in percentage (or absolute in W) is not really valuable, one should compare the measured UV-B watts per area from the same distance.
with fluorescent tubes you need to go very close to the canopy, otherwise your plants don´t benefit from it.
you could bomb your space with fl-tubes or cfl´s so that you have 300W of UV-B by calculation, but this doesn´t matter to your plants if they don´t obtain that radiation.

ps. i´m using it mainly for my sativas, if you´re interested i have a malawi grow running https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=322760 :)

greetings,

subrovka
 
Last edited:
yes i´m using it 90mins per day and the heat is not an issue as the most heat is radiated from the backside and the socket of the lamp.

3W of UV-B is a lot if your plants obtain that radiation.
also, that declaration in percentage (or absolute in W) is not really valuable, one should compare the measured UV-B watts per area from the same distance.
with fluorescent tubes you need to go very close to the canopy, otherwise your plants don´t benefit from it.
you could bomb your space with fl-tubes or cfl´s so that you have 300W of UV-B by calculation, but this doesn´t matter to your plants if they don´t obtain that radiation.

ps. i´m using it mainly for my sativas, if you´re interested i have a malawi grow running https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=322760 :)

greetings,

subrovka


Ill check out your grow.

How can you determine the UVB exposure? I could not find any measurements at all on their 'data' page. I dont think stating 3w UVB tells us anything at all

Agromax states 170 mW cm(2) @ 2ft. for their 48" t5. I believe this is more than sufficient to trigger desired response in cannabis.

Also even if the heat is coming out the back it's still wasted energy (unless it is cold in your room).

300w bulb but much is wasted through IR.
 

Crusader Rabbit

Active member
Veteran
Very interesting. A few comments, maybe of some value, maybe not. I myself have been using Behr ceiling paint since it is formulated to reflect visible light. Whether it reflects UV is unknown to me. Also, there was mention of the apparent "whiteness" of wall paint. Some wall paints contain ingredients (optical brighteners) that fluoresce when exposed to UV light, which gives the walls an apparent "whiteness and brightness" which isn't the result of reflected light, and is probably of no extra value for grow purposes.
 

biggreg

Member
The "whiteness" and "brightness" translated to 31% mor PAR (which is visible) lighting in my slapped together probably semi-scientific test.
 

biggreg

Member
The UV went from a directional 6 microwatts to a reflected, diffuse 25. Thats 416% more uvb. I doubt these gains will translate 1 for 1 in my 10x16 room but i'm confident i will see some plus have a much more wipeable and cleanable surface.
 
There are loads of peer reviewed uvb studies online. Ive used the posts of kite high on riu as a guide. He recommends 140-400 mW cm(2).

So far ive used the hortilux uvb and tge arcadia t5's. Both elicited responses from the canopy at 12-18" when energized for 4 hours per day. I havent used tge agromax enough to state its effectiveness.

Your results with the paint are impressive. What type of emitter will you use when you are good to go?
 

biggreg

Member
Will be running 24 of the Phillips CMH in the 942 mogul bare bulb from advance tech. After l install, I'll test the UVB levels and decide how much more if any I will need. Plan on playing by ear and solar meter 6.2.
 
Super interesting. I'll be looking forward to updates.

When I have some observations on that agromax bulb I'll let you know. Ive got a full figured beauty at week 3+. She's gonna get initiated as soon as buds form. She is currently full of flowers.

There is some well informed UVB discussion over on RIU if you are curious. A few gardeners swear by UVB but Ive not heard anyone mention reflective materials in relation to UVB.
 

biggreg

Member
Lots of growers use metal halides, CMH, 10k bulbs whatever for the uv enhancement. I think we may be missing the boat if our walls absorb large percentages of it.

In smaller grows with UVB bulbs close to canopy, UV reflectivity may not be as big of a benefit but for Mh and CMH users ( and some led users with UVA diodes), why lose the UV light you've already paid for?
 

subrovka

Member
Ill check out your grow.

How can you determine the UVB exposure? I could not find any measurements at all on their 'data' page. I dont think stating 3w UVB tells us anything at all

Agromax states 170 mW cm(2) @ 2ft. for their 48" t5. I believe this is more than sufficient to trigger desired response in cannabis.

Also even if the heat is coming out the back it's still wasted energy (unless it is cold in your room).

300w bulb but much is wasted through IR.


it´s a full spectrum lamp, so it puts out also IR but the heat from the backside is more convection than radiation (mix of both).
the bulb is very bright, so the plants don´t only benefit from the UV-B part of the spectrum.

..there´s a table in the attachment of my last post which states about 250 mW/cm^2 at 60cm (about 2ft) for the osram vitalux 300W.
this measurements wasn´t made by me, it´s from a german reptile-breeder´s page http://www.uromastyx-ocellata.de/?id.../uvbeleuchtung
there´s quite a lot of valuable information gathered about artificial lightning for animals (and so for plants). very interesting read but unfortunately all in german..

greetings,

subrovka
 
Lots of growers use metal halides, CMH, 10k bulbs whatever for the uv enhancement. I think we may be missing the boat if our walls absorb large percentages of it.

In smaller grows with UVB bulbs close to canopy, UV reflectivity may not be as big of a benefit but for Mh and CMH users ( and some led users with UVA diodes), why lose the UV light you've already paid for?
Ya, looks like in a larger space, with more canopy spacing reflective surfaces would be very beneficial. In my flower room (26 x 54" aprox) any one of the bulbs i mentioned will over supply UVB if placed close to the canopy <10", I im more concerned with limiting the exposure intensity and duration to best advantage.

I keep my led panel 20-24" above canopy and I hang the UVB bulbs a few inches lower.

Since in nature, UVB isnt reflected much it follows that studies of outdoor uvb would be looking at canopy exposure only. I wonder if there is any research showing effects of exposing more or most of the plant to UVB?

Im really interested to see what effects you observe after coating the walls.
 
it´s a full spectrum lamp, so it puts out also IR but the heat from the backside is more convection than radiation (mix of both).
the bulb is very bright, so the plants don´t only benefit from the UV-B part of the spectrum.

..there´s a table in the attachment of my last post which states about 250 mW/cm^2 at 60cm (about 2ft) for the osram vitalux 300W.
this measurements wasn´t made by me, it´s from a german reptile-breeder´s page http://www.uromastyx-ocellata.de/?id.../uvbeleuchtung
there´s quite a lot of valuable information gathered about artificial lightning for animals (and so for plants). very interesting read but unfortunately all in german..

greetings,

subrovka

good information. Thank you.

Have you seen obvious visible effects from the Osram bulb?

Im looking forward to testing out the agromax. I'll post some pics when i fully deploy it.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top