What's new

Trump thread part 2 (Or anything else we want to talk about that's ridiculous in politics today)

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
:laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing:

GPS—5,134 mobile devices, NOT EVEN CLOSE TO 15,000!

87% having attended 7 or more Kamala Harris rallies, antifa/blm, pro-Hamas, pro-Palestinian protests. Where were these attendees originally from?

700 devices originated from Illinois, 615 were from Washington, DC, 233 were from New York, 1,121 were from Georgia, 100 were from Pennsylvania, 104 were from the state of Washington, 845 were from California.

Approximately 1,000 are present at the university daily.

Using our cartel overlay after a tip from ICE… Results? 534 mobile devices are likely associates of the cartels, while 202 are associated with trafficking NGOs, included No Más Muertes (No More Deaths).
Completely made up boomer slop
 

MangueBeat

Active member
Some rules are a matter of common sense, that's correct. Common sense to me, is if somebody claims to be my ruler, without my explicit consent I owe them nothing but a stiff right cross and possibly a kick in the balls. My right cross ain't what it used to be. so the kick may have to come in. ;)

It's confusing to talk to you, you insist on confusing major issues of life in society with your personal life and your desires and beliefs.
I'm trying to talk about things much bigger than you here.

If you believe men get pregnant you’re the flat earther.

Dude, wake up! This is not a real issue, wtf?

You really believe in every piece of crap you see out there, don't you?

First of all, where did you get this idea about "men getting pregnant" and why is it relevant to you? Come on, try to think a little. Almost 20 thousand children dead in Gaza, the world is in climate collapse, going through the sixth mass extinction, we are on the verge of a third world war because of stupid leaders and you are thinking about a supposed "belief in pregnant men"?!?!?

My friend, you urgently need to stop seeing whatever your algorithm is throwing at you, you are funneling into alienation :good:
 

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
It's confusing to talk to you, you insist on confusing major issues of life in society with your personal life and your desires and beliefs.
I'm trying to talk about things much bigger than you here.



Dude, wake up! This is not a real issue, wtf?

You really believe in every piece of crap you see out there, don't you?

First of all, where did you get this idea about "men getting pregnant" and why is it relevant to you? Come on, try to think a little. Almost 20 thousand children dead in Gaza, the world is in climate collapse, going through the sixth mass extinction, we are on the verge of a third world war because of stupid leaders and you are thinking about a supposed "belief in pregnant men"?!?!?

My friend, you urgently need to stop seeing whatever your algorithm is throwing at you, you are funneling into alienation :good:
Climate collapse? Prove it without an appeal to authority logical fallacy.
 

MangueBeat

Active member
Climate collapse? Prove it without an appeal to authority logical fallacy.
"Prove it"
Man, don't you know how to research/study for yourself? Didn't you have an science class? History? Biology? Seriously, what do you expect with a question like that? Do you think people have time to lecture you on these topics? Besides, are you seriously asking this question? Don't you live in the same world as me? And if you do, have you ever left your own neighborhood? Do you understand the basics of the world you live in? Do you have the BASIC information on the subject of "the environment"? Well, to ask a question like that, it's pretty obvious that you don't. Why do you insist on talking about topics that you understand absolutely nothing about and simply go into denial? And then you still ask for "proof" of something that you only need to research/study the basics to have knowledge of. Although the collapse is visible to the naked eye, just look around, we wouldn't even need studies (and there are infinite studies on this) to see the obvious that everyone can see, except the deniers alienated by profound ignorance and pride in being stubborn.
 

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
"Prove it"
Man, don't you know how to research/study for yourself? Didn't you have an science class? History? Biology? Seriously, what do you expect with a question like that? Do you think people have time to lecture you on these topics? Besides, are you seriously asking this question? Don't you live in the same world as me? And if you do, have you ever left your own neighborhood? Do you understand the basics of the world you live in? Do you have the BASIC information on the subject of "the environment"? Well, to ask a question like that, it's pretty obvious that you don't. Why do you insist on talking about topics that you understand absolutely nothing about and simply go into denial? And then you still ask for "proof" of something that you only need to research/study the basics to have knowledge of. Although the collapse is visible to the naked eye, just look around, we wouldn't even need studies (and there are infinite studies on this) to see the obvious that everyone can see, except the deniers alienated by profound ignorance and pride in being stubborn.
I wrote a paper on the Lorenz equations used as the basis of their models in 1995. They are a set of non deterministic differential equations. The models all need constant updating to avoid totally unrealistic outputs.

So unless you’d like to discuss some math you’re using an appeal to authority.
 

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
using actual authorities that are actual experts in the actual topic being argued is not an appeal to authority fallacy, i hope this helps
I’m perfectly capable of having a technical discussion with the people writing the models, you aren’t. Do don’t tell me I’m the science denier.
 

nepalnt21

FRRRRRResh!
Veteran
I’m perfectly capable of having a technical discussion with the people writing the models, you aren’t. Do don’t tell me I’m the science denier.
i'm just pointing out about the inference of appeal to authority "fallacy", and how it likely wouldn't be a fallacy, i said nothing about you denying science
 
Top