What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

The Trump Countdown Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
The Mueller report didn't prove collusion, the only possible crime was obstruction and even that would be a weak case. The media duped you and you just will not accept it.


Where did I say Muller proved collusion for trump. Read the report champ. There's plenty of info that showed people where talking to russia. Trumps convicted buddy was found guilty of that collusion with Assange. We've all showed you the prof some even found guilty but you still deny pathetic.


Theres countless evidence Russia interfered on Trump's behalf. If any got played it was you champ.
 

Crooked8

Well-known member
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
:wtf:
 

Attachments

  • 3F1CB639-5228-4582-978A-9A43892A4518.jpeg
    3F1CB639-5228-4582-978A-9A43892A4518.jpeg
    14.8 KB · Views: 15

minds_I

Active member
Veteran
The Mueller report didn't prove collusion, the only possible crime was obstruction and even that would be a weak case. The media duped you and you just will not accept it.


Hello all,

Mueller's report specifically said that" there was not sufficient evidence to establish conspiracy...collusion is not a crime.

Mr Mueller and his team concluded that they were unable to charge the president with a crime, but could not exonerate him either.

He also found that "Over the course of my career I have seen a number of challenges to our democracy. The Russian government's effort to interfere in our election is among the most serious".

minds_I
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
 

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
The Seth Rich Documents show that the Family of Seth Rich is well aware of what the Deep State did to their son. Which then, obviously implies that they are part of a trap against the Deep State murderers. The trap has sprung.
 

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
The only reason he didn't charge trump was for that BS policy that a sitting POTUS cant be charged. This is not the law, no where is this listed in our constitution. He could have charged Trump but we all know barr would have stopped it.
 

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”


You forget about the porn star BS. He was guilty as individual #1 he should have been charged for that crime. We also know he did it again trying to get the British open moved to his golf course. These are crimes. There's no way you should be OK with this.

Now we have to deal with voting by mail corruption by trump. This will effect you as well. This is not OK. I would say the same if it was a dem doing this. Ill be watching what you guys say if trump refuses to except the election.
 
Last edited:

Hempy McNoodle

Well-known member
The only reason he didn't charge trump was for that BS policy that a sitting POTUS cant be charged. This is not the law, no where is this listed in our constitution. He could have charged Trump but we all know barr would have stopped it.

Mueler clarified that that was not what he was trying to say. He clarified that it was the opposite. He did not reach his conclusions due to that DOJ policy.
 

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Mueler clarified that that was not what he was trying to say. He clarified that it was the opposite. He did not reach his conclusions due to that DOJ policy.


This is what he said to congress.


Mueller made it clear during his afternoon testimony that because of the OLC opinion, his team did not even reach a conclusion about “whether the president committed a crime.” This point was a major clarification of an earlier exchange in which Mueller seemed to signal that he would have potentially charged the president, were it not for the OLC opinion. If they had considered it he would have IMO.
 

minds_I

Active member
Veteran
This is what he said to congress.


Mueller made it clear during his afternoon testimony that because of the OLC opinion, his team did not even reach a conclusion about “whether the president committed a crime.” This point was a major clarification of an earlier exchange in which Mueller seemed to signal that he would have potentially charged the president, were it not for the OLC opinion. If they had considered it he would have IMO.

Hello all,

In addition, I seem to recall that Mueller had left a road map for prosecution for congress, which did not take it up. Yet. perhaps the next ag will take it up when he is no longer prez.

minds_I

minds_I
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
Hello all,

In addition, I seem to recall that Mueller had left a road map for prosecution for congress, which did not take it up. Yet. perhaps the next ag will take it up when he is no longer prez.

minds_I

minds_I

Trump will go to jail the day Hillary goes to jail, never.
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
And this is one of many reasons why I will vote for Trump again, it's not a popularity contest for me. We flipped the 9th circuit and soon we will flip the Supreme Court.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...CBAK&usg=AOvVaw0vxUBjHyXjrgtxtm4BkmzB&ampcf=1

“Even well-intentioned laws must pass constitutional muster,” appellate Judge Kenneth Lee wrote on behalf of two of the three judges on the panel. “California’s near-categorical ban of (large-capacity magazines) strikes at the core of the Second Amendment, the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment.”
 

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
lmao, you do know you cant use that defense in most state where you use lethal force except in your home. Its a BS argument when the law prevents you from doing it anyway . Only stand you ground states can you kill someone outside your home
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
lmao, you do know you cant use that defense in most state where you use lethal force except in your home. Its a BS argument when the law prevents you from doing it anyway . Only stand you ground states can you kill someone outside your home

I can in the state of Indiana, the only place I can't carry a gun and use it to protect myself is Chicago. We just passed a law so the family of the person who was shot dead can't sue you if deadly force is considered justified.

"House lawmakers overwhelmingly approved a bill Monday to expand Indiana's “Stand Your Ground” law to cover civil lawsuits. The “Stand Your Ground” law says you can use force – even deadly force – to defend yourself, someone else, and your property. That protects you from criminal charges."
 

GOT_BUD?

Weed is a gateway to gardening
ICMag Donor
Veteran
That latest poll from Pew is hilarious.

56% of people saying they are voting for Biden simply because he's not Trump. Not because of his policies. Not because "he's for America".

Trump was even pretty much across the board if you care.
 

packerfan79

Active member
Veteran
LOL,You have done it countless times. None of you trupturds are getting your rights trampled here. You all speak your hate every damn day. Find me a liberal that would fight for hate speech, Ill wait. It is your right as free speech to vomit that crap. Liberals don't post hate speech. that's a right thing.

Nope. I have always delineated the difference between a leftist and a liberal. I don't hate anyone, I disagree with you. You only believe that because you do hate those who disagree with you.

Any liberal would fight for all speech. Leftist use bullshit terms like hate speech, to silence people they disagree with.

If you believe hate speech is a real thing, you are fundamentally illiberal.
 

Treevly

Active member
Biden was mostly a way of capturing the Black vote (or do I mean Vote of Color?) Black people tend to vote tribally, they turned out for Obama in unprecedented numbers, and since Biden had been Obama's VP, Biden was designated as Acceptable To Blacks. Ourside of that he is s fairly low-functionaing candidate, but that does not matter one bit. He is Not Trump, there is a non-white female on backup, and as long as the party wins, Biden can check out the next day. Dems would be OK with that; in fact, many of them would prefer it.

The odd factor in the race is that with almost all media having been religiously opposed to and hating on Trump since 05 November 2016, there are now zillions of citizens who would not dare tell a pollster of intentions to vote for Trump. Some of the better analysts, even some working for the Dems, understand that perfectly. Polls are right now badly unreliable.
 

unclefishstick

Fancy Janitor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
almost as though they know they should be ashamed of thinking of voting for him after 4 years of staggering incompetence...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top