jdkronyk101
Active member
i feel ya nomad
i feel ya nomad
but personally i believe these are the issues to be discussed weather popular points , winning stratagies or not, it needs to at least be discussed. playing only to win is not at all productive, hence our current govt. playing to be real, or for the love of the game? better translated "for the love of your fellow human bieng" that is reality. though id like to see cannabis decriminalized in my lifetime, and will do my part, in the end i could give a shit really if it passes. i survived before, and i hope to survive after...lol change is inevitable. but its our job as the mmj community to focus the discussion to "real" issues.
who's gonna get all the money should not be the focus of our debate, as it shows our true motives. and that itself is a non seller.
like for instance if we renamed the " compassionate use act" the " taking the money from the large landowning white barn growing elites, and distributing it into the hands of the mom n pop/collective local farmers act" that probably wouldnt sell well either. and definitely wouldnt have passed.
but none the less your point is valid and point taken.
bless,
j.d.
i feel ya nomad
if you're pushing for a win on 19, I suggest you leave the subject of amnesty out of your discussions as we approach November. Not a political winner. Not ever. Now, tax amnesty... parking ticket amnesty... those might win you an election in California.
but personally i believe these are the issues to be discussed weather popular points , winning stratagies or not, it needs to at least be discussed. playing only to win is not at all productive, hence our current govt. playing to be real, or for the love of the game? better translated "for the love of your fellow human bieng" that is reality. though id like to see cannabis decriminalized in my lifetime, and will do my part, in the end i could give a shit really if it passes. i survived before, and i hope to survive after...lol change is inevitable. but its our job as the mmj community to focus the discussion to "real" issues.
who's gonna get all the money should not be the focus of our debate, as it shows our true motives. and that itself is a non seller.
like for instance if we renamed the " compassionate use act" the " taking the money from the large landowning white barn growing elites, and distributing it into the hands of the mom n pop/collective local farmers act" that probably wouldnt sell well either. and definitely wouldnt have passed.
but none the less your point is valid and point taken.
bless,
j.d.