The recent invention of cannabis botany is a scam

[RequiredUsername]

And yeah there is a lot of bad methodology and unreliable data out there. But thats what Meta studys are for and reviews. Or even check the methods and data by yourself. Noone says you have to trust everything. But you also dont have to test everything by yourself. Just saying

Doubt, on a leash is best.

 

[H e d g e]

When thc percent became the proxy for quality instead of actual effects it decoupled the direction growers took from the actual effects their product has.

Their mistake was measuring total thc without distinguishing between delta9 and thcp or effectively removing antagonists

 

[Orange's Greenhouse]

Their mistake was measuring total thc without distinguishing between delta9 and thcp or effectively removing antagonists

Please pick up a pharmacology textbook before you use big words.

 

[@hempy]

The recent invention of cannabis botany is a scam​

Interesting title and discussion.

One of my all-time favourites has been inbreeding is bad and yet the same people that preach this support and promote selfing the most extreme form of inbreeding.

 

[Hiddenjems]

My doubt includes doctors, scholars, politicians, religious leaders, lawyers, salesmen, corporate fucks, bankers, and the list is endless. Like I said, I am a man of truth, not belief: To every imagined scenario you can think of.

Do you know quantum electrodynamics, or do you believe electricity works?

 

[led05]

One’s own Anecdotal Experience & wit rooted in/by the Scientific Principle while relying upon other professionals with a very healthy dose of skepticism…

I wonder How many folks whom understand quantum electrodynamics could wire a house into the mains?