Dime
Well-known member
I think manufacturing is perhaps where more pollution comes from than the use so the source is given a pass at the expense of the consumer.. I don't know if it will make for less pollution as the oil removal is already in place and it's old hat,except for tar sands a lot less land is uplifted and destroyed. But then I also think all homes should be made of plastic ,they would last forever and the more trees left in the ground the better because trees are the most important plant. There should be a choice and not a mandate and as time goes maybe more and more will go electric as the grid and technology meet the demand and ease into it. The mandate just segregates and no real advancement is possible.Right now if everyone did go EV the country would collapse and we would be literally in the dark.It's like building a house with no foundation. JMOTrue but all the minerals/elements they mine for use in manufacturing batteries for EV's the've been doing for years before EV's were really a thing on the market and they'll likely continue those samme mining practices even if all EV production were halted. So it's kind of misleading to say that because the process of making them is bad for the environment they're just as bad as other vehicles. Im sure there are aspects of ICE car manufature that is bad for the environment as well. The real point of value to the environment isn't the manufacturing but the pollution if any when it's being used.