-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
-
ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest in October! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!
The Obama camp responds to MMJ
- Thread starter BonsaiBud
- Start date
- Status
J
jipedestran
I don't know what to say.
There is no way in the world I could vote for Mccain.
I don't trust the democrats to do much better, but at least they are not the American Nazi Party like I view the GOP.
Long term, I don't think it is going to matter. The genie has left the bottle for the government. they just don't realize it yet.
peace
jip
There is no way in the world I could vote for Mccain.
I don't trust the democrats to do much better, but at least they are not the American Nazi Party like I view the GOP.
Long term, I don't think it is going to matter. The genie has left the bottle for the government. they just don't realize it yet.
peace
jip
M
Mossad
I don't have a huge problem with selfish rich fucks getting busted taking advantage
of sick fuckers like myself.
But i do pray that sometime in Obama land, that Bush and his derranged thorizine pushing fucks get all their money taken away for being shitfaces.
Especialy "CIA" assets (ya know, the ones driving your dope around for you) and not even dropping a roach for the poor fucks who "thought" they could use something
other than tobacco and datura all the time (same area of brain and that gets boring, like living off of a muscaria).
I do pray that we have drug laws that make sense, not only about cannabis.
If we can't solve all we can't have any, probably why they all think they are elite or something (which makes me not against being invaded by china or some country) oddly that is not pleasent either.
Enjoy the reefer "patients" they don't seem to have much respect for the mentally dead in my state (rymes with hell).
of sick fuckers like myself.
But i do pray that sometime in Obama land, that Bush and his derranged thorizine pushing fucks get all their money taken away for being shitfaces.
Especialy "CIA" assets (ya know, the ones driving your dope around for you) and not even dropping a roach for the poor fucks who "thought" they could use something
other than tobacco and datura all the time (same area of brain and that gets boring, like living off of a muscaria).
I do pray that we have drug laws that make sense, not only about cannabis.
If we can't solve all we can't have any, probably why they all think they are elite or something (which makes me not against being invaded by china or some country) oddly that is not pleasent either.
Enjoy the reefer "patients" they don't seem to have much respect for the mentally dead in my state (rymes with hell).
hesh
Active member
Hey guys, here's a link from cannabisnews.com, can't really find anything regarding the DEA, but what I get from Brown's guidelines is that some of the dispensaries might be in the trouble with the state the way they are doing things now...this is a couple days old but 
http://cannabisnews.com/news/24/thread24128.shtml
However, WAMM in Santa Cruz got the go-ahead with their suit against the federal government which might break some new ground...let's hope so...
http://cannabisnews.com/news/24/thread24124.shtml
On topic: I think Obama could bring some necessary change to our drug laws, but not unless the Dems are able to pick up a greater majority (2/3?) in the House and Senate...and there's a ton of big "if's" there. We're gettin' closer, keep on fightin'!
http://cannabisnews.com/news/24/thread24128.shtml
However, WAMM in Santa Cruz got the go-ahead with their suit against the federal government which might break some new ground...let's hope so...
http://cannabisnews.com/news/24/thread24124.shtml
On topic: I think Obama could bring some necessary change to our drug laws, but not unless the Dems are able to pick up a greater majority (2/3?) in the House and Senate...and there's a ton of big "if's" there. We're gettin' closer, keep on fightin'!
thats a good point CDM it makes me wonder what his policy will be. Maybe someone should ask him and put that on youtube.
He is trying to get elected, he is not going to say anything pro weed, it would be fucking stupid to talk about it. Stopping the raids, nationwide in med states, is the first step, let us take one step, but first, weed is for voters! Are you registered to vote?, No? Sorry, weed is for voters. You want a hit on the bong? Are you a voter? Yes? Then bong salute to you!
H
H
I am proud to say this is my first election and I will be voting in every single one after this. Even if it is just to take bong rips with Haps jk i vote because i care.
Unionman said:
Sauron The Blue
Member
thekingofNY said:
does anyone have a link to this us court case against the dea?
ThirdEyeVision
Active member
Unionman said:
Well the doctor said you must take one of these diseases.
It's either a COLD, or AIDS.
Yeah they both are inconvenient and potentially painful and at times down right unbearable.
But their longterm implications and consequences are much much different.
We all agree the system is a mess but wake up and understand the true stakes here.
G
guest
“Much as the federal government may prefer that California keep medical marijuana illegal, it cannot force the state to do so.” –Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski
http://newsroom-l.net/newsroom/?p=450
http://newsroom-l.net/newsroom/?p=450
G
guest
Thank you.zingablack said:
Sauron The Blue
Member
thanks for the link PB, i sent you a pm in response mentioning that it looked like a 9th circuit court of appeals in CA which we know doesnt hold too much ground in the fed arena, but as i read further into it it mentioned it was a US federal court, how its worded makes me wonder what this judgment really means:
"that the U.S. Constitution permits states to determine for themselves what is legal and what is illegal under state law, and that the federal government may not deliberately undermine this process."
We all know state laws have conflicted with federal laws in many areas, the us supreme court even said that was a common occurrence a few years ago . wonder why this defense hasn't been used more frequently especially for highly charged issues like gay marriage and labor laws.
oof too early in the morning for this fine of reading, be back soon!
"that the U.S. Constitution permits states to determine for themselves what is legal and what is illegal under state law, and that the federal government may not deliberately undermine this process."
We all know state laws have conflicted with federal laws in many areas, the us supreme court even said that was a common occurrence a few years ago . wonder why this defense hasn't been used more frequently especially for highly charged issues like gay marriage and labor laws.
oof too early in the morning for this fine of reading, be back soon!
- Status
