that means that conversion calculator is not working properly.
See other post. Im 8 weeks into flower so im not in pre flower im almost ready to start my Pre harvest feeding of nothing for a week or 2.
that means that conversion calculator is not working properly.
I have never had a issue with P ever that I can recall and its been a long time. This is the first time I have used a boost I have noticed a difference weather you say its K thats doing it and not p. Did you notice how high K is @350 . If it ain't broke dont fix it. I will continue to use this product at it's recommended dosages. Im considering there Bio line to try.
Why dont you do that test???? It seems to me that this kind of stuff is more geared towards a experiment that right up your ally not mine.
Humboldt Nutrients DeuceDeuce (0-0-22)
1170g/946mL = 1.24g/ml
@5mL/Gal
N 0
P 0
K 298
Ca 0
S NOT LISTED
Derived from: Potassium Sulfate, Ascophyllum Nodosum Kelp, and 1% Yucca Extract.
That's just a K booster it does not clear up anything until some one runs the test
Are you worried that it is on the low end Overthinker? I ask because I am currently flowering 13 ladies that are being only fed 26 ppm Ca, and my plants are doing greater now than ever
It has ~88 ppm Ca, the above figures lack the N, Ca, Mg and Fe from CalMag Plus.
I think the real question here is what constitutes P levels for:
Toxic consumption
Excessive consumption
Luxury consumption
Adequate consumption
Deficient consumption
desertsquirrel said:I think the real question here is what constitutes P levels for:
Toxic consumption
Excessive consumption
Luxury consumption
Adequate consumption
Deficient consumption
Home run.
I think we all are well aware that a vast array of feed formulas work. However, I would bet that 90% + of growers fall into a category above the adequate consumption category. Results may be acceptable but much resources are wasted, in many cases there is great environmental impact, and certainly much wasted money in the pockets of snake oil salesmen.