What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

The Great Awakening

Is the Great Awakening happening?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 39.0%
  • No

    Votes: 21 51.2%
  • Not Sure

    Votes: 4 9.8%

  • Total voters
    41

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
13 years old, huh?

yfs56afr19xa1.png
Exactly. Corroborated by a witness, in the employ of Epstein.
 

audiohi

Well-known member
Veteran
So I got to go search for birdog456 or emporobama on twitter or search for court case 5-16-cv-0797......


thanks for the link

I knew you would figure it out.

Just so you can't say I've never done anything for you, here are multiple links to the docs. You still seemed stressed and a little unsure of yourself.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-26b6-dda3-afd8-b6fe46f40000

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4524664/doe-v-trump/

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-267d-dda3-afd8-b67d3bc00000

11. On the third occasion involving the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson was forced to engage in an unnatural lesbian sex act with her fellow minor sex slave, Maria Doe age 12, for the sexual enjoyment of Defendant Trump. After this sex act, both minors were forced to orally copulate Defendant Trump by placing their mouths simultaneously on his erect penis until he achieved sexual orgasm. After zipping up his pants, Defendant Trump physically pushed both minors away while angrily berating them for the "poor" quality of their sexual performance.

I tried quoting my post from years ago when I posted the documents, but that portion of the site seems inaccessible anymore.
 
Last edited:

Three Berries

Active member
I knew you would figure it out.

Just so you can't say I've never done anything for you, here are multiple links to the docs. You still seemed stressed and a little unsure of yourself.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-26b6-dda3-afd8-b6fe46f40000

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4524664/doe-v-trump/

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-267d-dda3-afd8-b67d3bc00000



I tried quoting my post from years ago when I posted the documents, but that portion of the site seems inaccessible anymore.
LOL what a bunch of trash. Just more of the same old get trump shit that has failed the flopping Dem for years now.

You forgot this one....



NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)
 

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I knew you would figure it out.

Just so you can't say I've never done anything for you, here are multiple links to the docs. You still seemed stressed and a little unsure of yourself.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-26b6-dda3-afd8-b6fe46f40000

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4524664/doe-v-trump/

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-267d-dda3-afd8-b67d3bc00000



I tried quoting my post from years ago when I posted the documents, but that portion of the site seems inaccessible anymore.
same here. I posted the court documents and docket number about 2 years ago.
 

Three Berries

Active member
CNN going conservative under the will of John Malone, major shareholder in CNN's new parent company.

"Some liberals have suggested any tone shift for CNN can be traced back to John Malone, a billionaire media mogul who is a major shareholder in Discovery, which purchased CNN’s parent company, Warner Media, last year.

Before the purchase, Malone turned heads with comments saying he “would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing.”

Warner Media declined to comment this week on recent changes made to CNN’s programming and personnel, while Malone told The New York Times he had “nothing to do with” the decision to cancel “Reliable Sources.”

That hasn’t stopped the chatter."

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3634717-changes-spark-chatter-of-cnn-is-shift-from-left-to-right/


"Why billionaire John Malone’s shadow looms over CNN

One of the world’s most powerful news outlets has a new mandate --- which happens to sync with the views of one of the world’s richest men.

CNN is in flux. It has a new owner, and a new boss, who promises to remake the news channel and has told employees to be prepared for “a time of change.”

Most of those changes have yet to manifest. But one of the first ones --- canceling its long-running Reliable Sources show and pushing out anchor Brian Stelter — has already unsettled some CNN employees and viewers.

But the bigger question floating over one of the world’s largest and most important news organizations is why it’s changing. Is it because the CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, its new owner, wants an overhaul? Or is it at the behest of a conservative billionaire investor in the company who sits on its board?""

https://www.vox.com/2022/8/26/23322761/cnn-john-malone-david-zaslav-chris-licht-brian-stelter-fox-peter-kafka-column
 

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
CNN going conservative under the will of John Malone, major shareholder in CNN's new parent company.

"Some liberals have suggested any tone shift for CNN can be traced back to John Malone, a billionaire media mogul who is a major shareholder in Discovery, which purchased CNN’s parent company, Warner Media, last year.

Before the purchase, Malone turned heads with comments saying he “would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing.”

Warner Media declined to comment this week on recent changes made to CNN’s programming and personnel, while Malone told The New York Times he had “nothing to do with” the decision to cancel “Reliable Sources.”

That hasn’t stopped the chatter."

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3634717-changes-spark-chatter-of-cnn-is-shift-from-left-to-right/


"Why billionaire John Malone’s shadow looms over CNN

One of the world’s most powerful news outlets has a new mandate --- which happens to sync with the views of one of the world’s richest men.

CNN is in flux. It has a new owner, and a new boss, who promises to remake the news channel and has told employees to be prepared for “a time of change.”

Most of those changes have yet to manifest. But one of the first ones --- canceling its long-running Reliable Sources show and pushing out anchor Brian Stelter — has already unsettled some CNN employees and viewers.

But the bigger question floating over one of the world’s largest and most important news organizations is why it’s changing. Is it because the CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, its new owner, wants an overhaul? Or is it at the behest of a conservative billionaire investor in the company who sits on its board?""

https://www.vox.com/2022/8/26/23322761/cnn-john-malone-david-zaslav-chris-licht-brian-stelter-fox-peter-kafka-column
So with this, Murdoch and Musk, you will have your news and views dictated by the elite rich? (globalists?)
 

Three Berries

Active member
So with this, Murdoch and Musk, you will have your news and views dictated by the elite rich? (globalists?)
Good projection. Murdoch is dirty as hell. Musk probably is too. My views were changed years before I ever heard of either.

It's the Left that is captured in projected narratives, not I. You will find this out as your MockingBird media dies out.
 

Microbeman

The Logical Gardener
ICMag Donor
Veteran
It's just a coincidence you reasoning reflects the Hamilton 68 output....
You make assumptions in your effort to package people into categories. I have only replied to your statements and have not waxed philosophically nor politically. You do have the freedom to read. [I do not know what Hamilton 68 is]
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top