A
Alone
Why not "Plumbers Crack". Or "Toe Cheeze"?
Have a Satori crossed with an old Sour Jack ( some old mota freebies ) That will put you down after a big bong rip... All the peeps who dare enough to take that big bong rip go down on there knees to perform the TEBO ( sp?) ... So please dont take my name...
I am/have.................The TEBO!!!!!!!!
names are very important, take this for example...
[URL="https://www.icmag.com/ic/picture.php?albumid=39219&pictureid=992508"]View Image[/URL] [URL="https://www.icmag.com/ic/picture.php?albumid=39219&pictureid=992506"]View Image[/URL] [URL="https://www.icmag.com/ic/picture.php?albumid=39219&pictureid=992500"]View Image[/URL] [URL="https://www.icmag.com/ic/picture.php?albumid=39219&pictureid=992497"]View Image[/URL] [URL="https://www.icmag.com/ic/picture.php?albumid=39219&pictureid=992498"]View Image[/URL]
it's lineage is (Trainwreck x Trinity) x [(Cleaner x Jack herer) x (Romulan x Cindy 99)]= Chernobyl and Chernobyl x Sour Bubble = The China Syndrome pictured above and thats not even as deep as it really goes seeing how the cleaner is quite the hybrid itself... then the Sour bubble which has its own somewhat un clear lineage
so what make more sense... in reality, calling the strain...
This...
{(Trainwreck x Trinity) x [(Cleaner x Jack herer) x (Romulan x Cindy 99)]} x Sour Bubble or....
This...
The China Syndrome
TGA's Chernobyl x BOG's Sour Bubble???
unless you think that all weed is the same, and you simply call it all weed... names are as every bit important as giving different names to different breeds of dog... instead of just calling them all DOG.
I have to disagree with Bruce. Potency has increased dramatically with hybirdization. Yes, there were a handful of potent landraces, but most of the herb of 20-30 years ago couldn't hold up to what's available today. The purists will insist hybrids "water down the gene pool". Truth is mankind and mother nature have been manipulating the landraces since the beginning.
Viewpoints are starting to change. Most of today's growers want a variety of phenotype expressions to explore. IMHO a good hybrid will produce mostly homoginous offspring with traits of both of the parentals, as well as a few surprises.
One big difference I see with today's strains vs. those of yester-year is yes, they are more potent, but they're missing alot of the subtle nuanced effects we came to love back then. I can't remember the last time I smoked a strain that gave me the giggles, trails or any other visual effects.
I've started collecting a variety of Skunk genetics, hoping to find one of those
happy old school phenos we called "party pot".
The most potent isn't always the best, but that's what most ppl are looking for these days.
Hey Mr Grimbo, M. Emery was hyping ISS as Vancouver's "best of the best" back in 2004/05, said it was the perfect party weed, social/upbeat/happy, and it reminded him of summertime.
As for the brown vs. green debate, you'll recall that pretty much all of the weed in the 70's was brown, and occasionally gold or red. But once in a while there was that pale lime green indoor sensi from Cali, and that shit was deadly potent. But as strong as it was, it seemed to be missing some of the elements of being high we were used to.
The weed scene is always evolving. I wouldn't be surprised if it goes thru a retro phase. Now that I think about it, Retro would be a great name for an old school strain!