If anyone has actual proof of what’s being accused id like to see it.
I tend to deal with hard facts, and not hearsay....
I tend to deal with hard facts, and not hearsay....
If anyone has actual proof of what’s being accused id like to see it.
I tend to deal with hard facts, and not hearsay....
Chimera posted this on his Twitter account.
What’s the context?
The discovery shows that living tissue can be made using “dead” tissue.
Why is “dead” now in quotations? Because the term “dead” is being litigated.
So, people send in “dead” tissue to a genetic bank that, dead cells are able to be cultured to living cells, and likely Phylos does have TC’s of genetic material sent in by people who thought they were sending in dead plant material, which is giving Phylos possession of living genetic code, paid for by the people who donated the genetic material to Phylos.
This plant is going to be used in drugs, pharmaceuticals, foods and drinks, construction, textile, etc.
It’s a multi-trillion dollar industry.
We are witnessing novel technology being developed for this industry and BioTech is at the center of that, meaning billions if mot trillions for certain BioTech companies, like the Phylos/Skunkman conglomerate.
These plays being made have been orchestrated for a long time by multi-national entities.
I tissue cultured my great grandmother from a locket of her hair and she's a vigorous four year old now and already cleans the barn pretty good.
Phylos tested her and she's got landraces Genetics with just a small percentage of Skunk#1.
Didn’t sam s post that any sample sent through him gets its dna extracted before being sent to Phylos, so all they receive is dna not plant tissue?
No tissue, no tissue culture I assume?
I can't see any quote saying they own Phylos Galaxy on the website you linked or any reference to it, do you have a proof they are linked or are you just guessing they are?
To me it looks like they are bragging about having a large genetics collection but I don't think it's coming from Phylos Galaxy. I could be wrong but you as well assuming they are linked.
In fact what most here are saying is acthe opposite. They can’t take our samples and patent them because they are the same ones that have made the data public proving they have been in the public domain.