lol. it wouldnt be skunky if it didnt have a shitload of terpenes present, so i think that theory on skunk is bunk
Looking through some of the Kings College anti- skunk studies they mention regular hash and strangely don't see it as a huge problem because its a more balanced product. Part of their angle against skunk is that it is almost all THC supposedly, bred almost everything else out of it on purpose.
lol. it wouldnt be skunky if it didnt have a shitload of terpenes present, so i think that theory on skunk is bunk
While some of the conclusions are dubious, as a whole it still has merit.
Who can't spot the difference between a hardcore dabber and an occasional toker of light sativa?
I've watched incredibly smart people dab themselves retarded and still think it has no effect on their performance. The more sober observers tend to disagree.
"Oh but I'm different, I'm just fine when I..."
Sure you are. And the alky stumbling over his own words and feet who claims the same is also correct (only within the confines of his own mind though).
Some of you sure get your knicks in a knot when your idols are questioned. Cannabis is a drug, to believe it only has positive effects is ostrich mentality.
The brain of an occasional drinker is different from a lifelong alcoholic. Few would question this. Who hasn't claimed LSD, mushrooms, etc, changed their perspective/outlook on life? Do you think it was a result of a change in your kidneys or gall bladder?
There is nothing special about cannabis. It has many medicinal and practical (manufacturing) uses, but then so do most drugs.
Knot those panties ladies.
Free this, freedom that, but don't question the one they hold close to their heart.