All this discussion over distances... never could settle this in my head, so...
Does anyone have any scientific data regarding how much light mj can use? I get this is dependent upon a number of factors, e.g., temps, nutes, co2, rh, etc, but does anyone have any real data? I haven't ever seen anything...
The closest i've found dated back to '87 from Daniel Storm... has a chart in his book correlating light intensity & co2 levels to plant growth rates. No raw data, but the chart indicates that diminishing returns are reached at appx 6500 lumens x 1300 ppms co2... anything over & above has very little impact to maximum growth rates.
With this in mind, what exactly would the benefits be of placing the plant tops so very close to the light such that 40k lumens is achieved??? Is it really doing anything of benefit, or perhaps even slowing "ideal" growth rates?
The benefit I've always noticed was plant canopy density & overall footprint maximization. These two components to verti output is dependent on casting a wider arc of light... 360d in fact. So, if you had stacked 1000's, or even a single, you will get more footprint by having the bulb 2' feet away vs 12". The 2' will have more plant canopy available & will still over saturate the canopy w max usable lumens.
Is this way off base?!? Peace.
Bob,
Thanks for posting this. I've been thinking this over in a lot of ways. The only way to figure this puzzle out, will be for me to buy a light meter, and figure out the distances from the cool tube, and see how many lumens i get. I've read in many places that 5k lumens is about where you want to be for each bud, thus your 6500 lumens doesn't seem far off.
There is a thread on icmag about testing different reflectors, i'm going to take a look at it and see where their average is. That will give us a rough estimate. However, since we don't have a reflector and are vertical, i think it will be less. Thus the need for my own test.