I'd be curious as well, but from a point of self-preservation rather than that of emulation....
just be careful that what may become "industry standard" does not neccessarily become what people consider to be "a good way to do it".
my point is that IF herb NEEDS irradiating (or the like), it probably should not be smoked or extracted from at all.
I think it depends on where the line is drawn. What seems fine to you or me may or may not pass muster when subjected to rigorous standards & scientific analysis. If limits are set low enough, it'll all have to be treated one way or another. And, let's face it, we've both read here accounts of people salvaging what they can from a moldy grow when the truth is that it's probably all moldy- some areas are merely not as advanced & undetectable to the human eye.
I also think that as legalization progresses that both providers & regulators will want to find ways to assure customers that the product is healthful. So they'll have it tested for a variety of issues, and may well heat treat all of it so that the issue of mold spores simply disappears entirely. The public is already leery of irradiated food whether that's rational or not, so I think heat treatment will be the standard provided it does not interfere with other valuable qualities that buyers appreciate.
And why not? We'll know for sure that there are no living mold spores, whether the product had significant numbers before treatment or not. Yeh, sure, I trust my own stuff, but OTOH I don't have more than my eye to tell me that I can.