well, we have already walked out onto that slippery slope. when we slide, will we catch ourselves before we hit bottom going WFO ??? "SPLAT!"We should be more human and less machine... lest we become Nazis.
well, we have already walked out onto that slippery slope. when we slide, will we catch ourselves before we hit bottom going WFO ??? "SPLAT!"We should be more human and less machine... lest we become Nazis.
She might be our future President.
Shootin' vermin.What is she going to need that for??
What is anyone going to need that for??
What is that intended to hit and why does it appear to have a shoulder butt??
Maybe her parents are a hard argument for abortion rights.
What is she going to need that for??
What is anyone going to need that for??
What is that intended to hit and why does it appear to have a shoulder butt??
Maybe her parents are a hard argument for abortion rights.
The use of ammunition of 20 mm caliber for precision shooting originates during the Soviet-Finnish war of 1939-1940. The Finns during this war to fight the Soviet tanks used the Lahti M39 anti-tank rifles in combat. But, in addition to the main purpose, these guns were used to fight snipers.
I think it is prudent to focus on sustainable food and functional society before we act like those women didn't make a decision about the welfare of their child and their world in which they live.
you're looking at it all wrong:forced to fund other's abortions?
What are your thoughts on connecting fully or partially subsidized abortions with some equivalent time working a sustainable garden to help pay back the labor of the people that are forced to fund other's abortions?
Women that find ways to fund their own abortions without forcing others to fund it, could be released from any obligations to pull weeds or have their tubes tied.
Is it fair and prudent to "pay back society" by giving back at least some of what you take?
Do you remember this book?
View attachment 19116019
lol. Federally illegal?instead of thinking of it as funding abortions (which we've already established is illegal federally
yes, federally illegal to use taxes to fund abortions; where's the confusion?lol. Federally illegal?
I think it's asinine to consider that any kind of solution.
I think you should pay your taxes.
You can pretend that your taxes aren't spent on whatever you want.
Looks like all the types of abortion that could be considered healthcare still federally funded.yes, federally illegal to use taxes to fund abortions; where's the confusion?
Who hasn't read the Ignorant Libertarian's Guide to Living Self-Centeredly....??
yes, federally illegal to use taxes to fund abortions; where's the confusion?
Self-centered ? Seeking parity in financial matters is "self centered" but forcing others by proxy to pay for your wants and needs is not self-centered? You are funny.
Did you just finish reading the Liberals Guide to Hypocritical and absurd Rationalizations ?
I wonder if you will refute anything below or if your only response will be more euphemistic rationalizations or an insult instead of an argument.
Also, before I retired I paid plenty of taxes, taken right out of the old paycheck, so you can keep saddling up that horse if you like but it's a lame horse.
Fact- People that labor in the USA have a portion of the money they earn from wages etc. taken as taxes. Taxes on labor are not voluntary, they are compulsory, taken from paychecks etc.
Fact- Abortions ARE at least partially funded / subsidized by tax payers, despite @nepalnt21 laughable claim they aren't. Planned Parenthood gets a shitload of government grant money which keeps the physical spaces where abortions are performed operating. Even an idiot should be able to connect those dots. If Planned Parenthood were not subsidized, abortions would cost more. Abortions are subsidized.
Fact- You think a person that gets a subsidized abortion paid by the labor of other people, has no obligation to pay the laboring people back in some manner. You think it's asinine.
Fact - People that are forced to labor on behalf of others, without the laborers consent are called slaves.
You took the pro slavery-position on my hypothetical question. Not surprised!
How many times have I told you, it's not slavery if it's for abortions!
Yessuh. I'll go pick your sustainable vegetables for you now,
MEAN Massa Mustard!!
View attachment 19116106
The hen wasn't seeking parity, she was forcing labor. The cow didn't want the bread baked, the hen did.
Is there something in particular that you want?
What horse are you talking about?
This is something that I would be inclined to agree with, as long as we are talking about income tax.
Abortions are not all that Planned Parenthood does. There would have to be a list of acceptable charges negotiated separately and the relevant portion returned.
I think that taxes go towards whatever spending the government requires. I don't think people should be enslaved to pay back whatever portion the Christian Coalition wishes. I think slavery is asinine.
That is correct.
The hell I did.
It's not slavery if it's taxes.