mriko said:Thanks esbe ! But I have no merit, I just pushed the button ! The Tosh pics were shot with a, probably older than I, Canon camera without flash. Sure doesn't get the resolution of today's digicams, but makes great pics !
do u know what model u got?
honestly - those old cams are like tanks - they will work under most conditions as long as u got a battery
GanjaPasha said:I agree the Canon A-series were built like tanks, but I always preferred Nikon, I had two secondhand F1s, a secondhand F4 and for a while a Canon AE-2, but the best camera I ever owned was the F4, wish they made high res digital backs for old Nikon cheap, as I'd go buy one right away. I don't like how automated and complicated modern cameras have become, I still like setting aperture and shutter speed manually when doing serious photography, something that was simple and intuitive with the old manual Nikons, still not seen a modern digital SLR that is as simple to use in this way. I had a few Russian Leica copies too, I used to carry one everywhere with me - nice and small, but not very light - solid metal, but I loved rangefinder cameras. Wonder what the latest Leica digicams are like?
l33t said:For color accuracy consistency among different photos , I generally find the best way is to use the flash and have no other light sources .Then you only need to set the WB setting to Flash or Auto.. Do you happen to have any of these Golds shot under flash light and with properly setup WB Raco ? I would be really interested to see the true actual colors/gonden tint , cause correcting the WB afterwards on jpgs is not accurate by any means and the non-WBalanced pics dont allow the true colors show up..
mriko,
DO write a book
or at least,a great article
write
I´m beggin you please
mriko - yeah man a book! - or atleast a article! been reading and checking ur pics for such a long time now - and if us old potheads and younger ones like it - im definetly sure the book would sell! go for it man!