G
Guest
So prove it or STFU OK? Why this need to be Right? If this is fiction I like it better anyhow.
Last edited:
lumbo said:Not to belabour the point, ex, but I think you nailed it. You can't prove a negative, so nobody will every really know what went down. Just like nobody will ever prove that the LockNess Monster doesn't exist.
I think this has everything to do with money and commerce, and nothing to do with the law. That's the way the world works, but I feel bad that we all lost a great website and some good people lost a lot of sleep and in some cases, their grows.
Well, it wasn't our website to lose since we didn't own it or pay the bills. And losing sleep over security concerns is just part of this way of life. And another crop is only 4 months away.
lumbo said:\
But a lot of bad blood has been created by this whole sad affair, and I don't think we can blame the police for that. Some people seem to want to put all this behind us and move on to the next big thing. Ain't gonna happen for everyone.
\
WeedWrapperMan said:So prove it or STFU OK? Why this need to be Right? If this is fiction I like it better anyhow.
tug said:Snohoman from the pnw
I'll assume snohomish?
I had a bad experience there in 2003, I was busted for reckless driving in Everett, when they found a roach in my car (Canadian in an american land) they arrested me, and when I made a stink about the way I was treated, they switched judges on me, giving me jail time right there after getting me to sign a waiver to face a lesser charge (they told me if I signed, I could go home).
Then the 'hanging judge' Weisman, rejected the plea, quoting how Canadians shouldn't be here breaking our laws when our boys are over in Iraq fighting a war....., and how if I had been smarter I would've kept my mouth shut more.
Car towed from the courthouse, no change of clothes, not enough cash for 2 weeks in the can, etc., wasn't that an illegal war anyway????????
Ah, the snohomish county jail for a week (max security), then Indian Ridge (medium security) for another, FOR SPEEDING, MOUTHING OFF, and being CANADIAN.
The original judge (Moon) was good, as was the female prosecutor, and the police officers involved, but Weisman, who is a drunken lout drinking and driving himself takes the cake for asshole of the year.
I heard from all kinds of people in I. Ridge who say Weisman is a drinking driver, even hitting a bridge once when drunk, but doesn't face charges himself as a judge.
Kind of ironic for a guy who supposedly lost his daughter to a drinking driver.
Since then I looked him up on the web, and he has been reprimanded before, for 'expanding' his idea of what the law means a little too much, too often.
The american gov't and it's representatives never fail to amaze me......