What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

R.I.P. Boy Scouts

U

Ununionized

Wikipedia isn't accepted as legitimate authority by ANYONE.

And with darn good reason.

The scams at Wikipedia ABOUND.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...mall-businesses-and-celebrities-10481993.html

In another infamous mass attack on science an editor at Wikipedia named

William 'Con-Man' Connolly: a statistician and left-wing wacko

one day set upon Wikipedia:

and began to systematically erase the entire planet's climate sciences,

and even the sciences related to them: and,

Earth's entire natural climate history,

and the history of climate science itself: eradicating any mention of improprieties discovered to abound in "The sewer of the sciences."

He continued, being briefly caught and brought to a pause in his systematic science destruction for six months,

after eight years uninterrupted open destruction of both science AND history.

"Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used
information source the world has ever known – Wikipedia. Starting
in February 2003, just when opposition to the claims of the band
members were beginning to gel,

Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site.

He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on

the greenhouse effect,

on the instrumental temperature record, on

the urban heat island,

on climate models,

on global cooling.


On Feb. 14, he began to erase the Little Ice Age;

on Aug.11, the Medieval Warm Period.

In October, he turned his attention to the hockey stick graph.

He rewrote articles on the politics of global warming

and on the scientists who were skeptical of the band.

Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two of the world’s most distinguished climate scientists, were among his early targets,

followed by others that the band especially hated, such as Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,

authorities on the
Medieval Warm Period.

All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles.

His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator,
which allowed him to act with virtual impunity.

When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it —

more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand.

When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making,

he often had them barred —

over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him

found themselves blocked from making further contributions.

Acolytes whose writing conformed to Connolley’s global warming views, in contrast, were rewarded with Wikipedia’s blessings.
In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement."

=====
CBS's coverage of the YEARS long systematic destruction of natural Earth sciences by the same - and other wackos - destroying science and history at Wikipedia:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wikipropaganda-on-global-warming/

The wanton destruction of climate science is only one of many scandals regarding Wikipedia's propagation of
falsehoods and outright FAKE history, on a mass scale.

Today almost a decade and a half after he started his mentally-ill level, sociopathological, withering attack on science and history as well,

with other friends who are government employee "scientists" who also started the fake climate sciences website "RealClimate"

about the same time Connolly set upon Wikipedia -

Connolly is STILL ACTIVE at Wikipedia, as well as using aliases.

It should be noted: he isn't even banned from Wikipedia as a consultant/editor:

they just made (asked) him to stop defacing climate science and Earth natural sciences history

for SIX MONTHS

several years ago.

The reason he uses aliases today is because it kept detracting from his time defacing science and history articles,

when people realized it was him doing it, and he had to go back and explain himself,

only to lose when people realized he hasn't got any real scientific education or authority, in any of the scientific fields his life's mission is defacing.
=======
Connolly is only one of these although he's certainly most famous.

Through the years, scandals have surfaced where

Banks

Governments of nations' individual bureaus:

tax bureaus,

attorney-generals' offices,

governors' offices,

climate bureaus, - have ALL been caught

defacing history and science

on Wikipedia.

Obviously Wikipedia isn't interested in it being known.

But Wikipedia is NOT an authoritative source for knowledge of history.

Or science.

Of ALL the things revisionists seek to destroy - history is right up there at the VERY top.


wiki is a joke to people that are not very intelligent and look up dumb things on it.

never has there been a greater source for world history information


================

https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/whats-wrong-wikipedia

Harvard warns firmly that Wikipedia is not an authentic scientific source.

A list of commonly recognized limitations to Wikipedia being trustworthy, even in principle:

https://www.findingdulcinea.com/new...tudents-Cannot-Cite-or-Rely-on-Wikipedia.html

Places like Snopes are NOT authoritative analysis.

Places like Wikipedia are NOT authoritative analysis.

These places are both infested with elitists who wish to enslave the entire world to their FAKE pseudo-science, and FAKE history narratives - "Educational" and "Science" government employees who are nothing more nor less than criminals,

and

with the gullible half-educated cheerleaders who try their best to help mob science and history out of existence

because they actually think the science and history fraud,

are real.

They're called 'zealots' and 'crooks' and 'frauds' and they operate hand in glove with each other, just like they do with one of the government employees' other great chemistry scams:

that "pot is like heroin," and "worse for one than a meth-amphetamine addiction." That it's a "Gateway to Heroin."

Even as the land's TOP "scientific" and legal government employees FERVENTLY SHOUT that THEY THEMSELVES are ALL GETTING addicted to OPIOIDS because they..
turned to OPIOIDS,
the REAL gateway to HEROIN - the OPIATE.

Of course the half educated authority worshippers, and criminally inclined charlatans, infest these organizations like magnets draw iron filings.

When you go to Wikipedia there is one thing you DO know:

government employees and their friends involved in scams,

have thoroughly gone through *in a businesslike and systematic fashion*

and PERSISTENTLY PURGED the TRUTH from EVERY single article on Wikipedia

as pertains to ANY natural science or earth science history,

and as pertains to ANY modern POLITICAL history because

as PART of their JOBS as VOLUNTEERS who actually work

as desk pushers for any number of government entities,

they DEVOTE TIME

and enlist government job resources,

to SYSTEMATICALLY VOID ALL RESEARCH that QUESTIONS GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED opinion, - e.s.p.e.c.i.a.l.l.y. ACADEMIA.

It's ACADEMICS perpetrating MOST of the fraud.

Look how they provided "critical peer review university research" to put MILLIONS in JAIL in over a HUNDRED COUNTRIES
for the past EIGHTY years - over POT.

Their SCAM on the EARTH through the Education system and through MASSIVE efforts to SEIZE control of INFORMATION on - basically EVERYTHING - is the reason people here - at this site - have to CAREFULLY CONCEAL who we ARE or be TARGETED, CRIMINALIZED, ROBBED, ASSAULTED, and IMPRISONED.
 
U

Ununionized

https://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=8279542&postcount=121

Babbling Dude,

You're right, Wikipedia is a figment of my imagination broadcast in a mass planetary hallucination.

Your tin hat's leaking.

https://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericgo...andal-highlights-wikipedias-vulnerabilities/#

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/03/wikipedia_industrial_scale_smears_and_blackmail/

https://www.dailydot.com/business/wikipedia-paid-editing-scandal-stanton/

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...sed-of-editing-wikipedia-pages-of-tory-rivals

https://thinkprogress.org/wikipedia...-extensive-cybercrime-syndicate-d4949ebf47c8/

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-big-paid-editing-scandals-of-the-English-Wikipedia

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...lsborough-as-more-changes-emerge-9291988.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia_controversies

https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/most-notorious-wikipedia-scandals.html

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/twi...f-ottawa-staffers-making-wiki-edits-1.1916720

https://www.rt.com/usa/240521-nypd-wikipedia-garner-edits/

https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/...es-wikipedia-to-review-editor-policy-1.645912

===============================
"A positive Wikipedia article is invaluable SEO: it's almost guaranteed to be a top three Google hit. Surprisingly this benefit of writing for Wikipedia is underutilized, but relates exactly the lack of true expertise in the field. ... WE HAVE THE EXPERTISE NEEDED to navigate the complex maze surrounding 'conflict of interest' editing on Wikipedia. With more than eight years of experience, over 10,000 edits, and countless community connections we offer holistic Wikipedia services."

https://www.techspot.com/news/50226...allegedly-involved-in-favoritism-scandal.html
 
Last edited:

Mikell

Dipshit Know-Nothing
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Wikipedia had many issues in the first few years and does to this day. It's the nature of their platform.

It's a useful resource to get a broad picture of a topic before delving in deeper elsewhere.

Feel free to correct anything erroneous in the Snopes article.

Your posts are the ramblings of a sandwich board street prophet. I see an unkempt wild haired beatnik waving his arms in the air and gesticulating at the sky in my mind while reading that jibberish.

Doesn't exactly dispose anyone to do anything but give you their change.
 
Last edited:

Ringodoggie

Well-known member
Absolutely. I always read the Reader's Digest Condensed version before I read any novel...... just to make sure I'll like it before I read it.

Kinda like tasting pussy before you stick ol' freddie in there.

OK, I can see that.

Sorry guys, thanks for the explanation.


I'm good, now.


Still don't understand why everyone doesn't think like I do. I guess everybody's just stupid. I don't know.
 
W

Water-

not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?

edit: oh, I just saw your statement that you mentally ill and to ignore you.

best of luck



"The American Psychiatric Association's standard reference for psychiatry defines over 450 different mental disorders. I suffer from most of them.
Please be understanding if I act a tiny bit unusual at times. Thank you." - ringodoggie
 

Mikell

Dipshit Know-Nothing
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Absolutely. I always read the Reader's Digest Condensed version before I read any novel...... just to make sure I'll like it before I read it.

Kinda like tasting pussy before you stick ol' freddie in there.

OK, I can see that.

Sorry guys, thanks for the explanation.


I'm good, now.


Still don't understand why everyone doesn't think like I do. I guess everybody's just stupid. I don't know.

Ringo, baby, you know I love ya :moon:
 

Ringodoggie

Well-known member
what?

are you ringodggie?

I was referring to wikipedia not wikileaks


Yep, that's it. You guessed it. Gypsy and I are one in the same. I'm his alter-ego.





ROTFLMAO....



Gyp's been on this board for over a decade and I'll bet he's never been so insulted. Dude, you're banned. LMAO
 

Ringodoggie

Well-known member
Of course, I knew that because I am him. Or, I mean he is I. Or, we are them., Or, whatever. LOL


I don't know shit about him or this site but it sounds like he's been dragged through the shit and..... well, I been there done that so, I guess he's OK in my book. Birds of a feather. LOL
 
U

Ununionized

What "You see" is that your bullsh** got called by someone with enough sense to know it for what it is. That's why all you managed to say is

"You're right, it's crap."


Wikipedia had many issues in the first few years and does to this day. It's the nature of their platform.

It's a useful resource to get a broad picture of a topic before delving in deeper elsewhere.

Feel free to correct anything erroneous in the Snopes article.

Your posts are the ramblings of a sandwich board street prophet. I see an unkempt wild haired beatnik waving his arms in the air and gesticulating at the sky in my mind while reading that jibberish.

Doesn't exactly dispose anyone to do anything but give you their change.
 
Last edited:

Mikell

Dipshit Know-Nothing
ICMag Donor
Veteran
You see what you want. Crowd sourcing is not perfect but did I not call it crap. All new approaches and ideas cut their teeth in infancy.


I look up the basics of biology and physics as it relates to our craft. If I want to read further, I use what I learn there to expand elsewhere.

Oh. Almost forgot. I also look up biographies of authors I enjoy.

It's beyond me how that is the root for a global conspiracy but I feel like a shakey foundation to build a theory on is familiar ground to you.
 

Ringodoggie

Well-known member
Oh sorry....I was just ranting nonsensically,...


See, I told you I was him. Or, I mean he is I. I mean we are.... oh fuck it. Never mind. LOL


Damn, Gyp.... being mistaken for ME!! You been dragged through some shit in life but.... never anything THAT bad. LOL
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
When one loses a sense of perspective in life, it does help to have a sense of humor.
 

Mikell

Dipshit Know-Nothing
ICMag Donor
Veteran
See, I told you I was him. Or, I mean he is I. I mean we are.... oh fuck it. Never mind. LOL


Damn, Gyp.... being mistaken for ME!! You been dragged through some shit in life but.... never anything THAT bad. LOL

Better the keyhole toilet.
 

Gypsy Nirvana

Recalcitrant Reprobate -
Administrator
Veteran
When one loses a sense of perspective in life, it does help to have a sense of humor.

Agreed, and with all the Wikki this and Wikki that ....its oh so easy to confuse a 'pedia' with a 'leaks', especially when the eyes start going all wobbly thru tiredness .....

As for the ranting, its a slow process to be able to get really good at it, unless you are naturally talented, like my younger sister who could win Olympic gold, if only 'Freestyle Ranting' was an Olympic sport.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top