What's new
  • ICMag with help from Phlizon, Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest for Christmas! You can check it here. Prizes are: full spectrum led light, seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Photoperiod and yield with autos

Creeperpark

Well-known member
Mentor
Veteran
All plants need a nighttime break to use their metabolic system. Running the photoperiod 24 hours a day is not in the auto plant's or any plant's best interest. Healthy plants have to have a nighttime break.

Is 24-hour light bad for plants?

Plants absorb light and convert it into energy. At night, when everything goes dark, respiration converts this energy into carbohydrates for later use. It means that exposing plants to light 24 hours a day can prevent respiration from occurring, which is also not conducive to healthy plant growth. Google

It depends mostly on genetics that is bred into the ruderalis. I see people running 18-hour photoperiods and getting killer results. If you run some keep us posted.
 

Spaventa

...
Veteran
Yes shorter days will result in lower yields (and vice versa). Not sure that it's quite such a direct relation that 12/12 will yield half of 24/0 though.

Ok so let’s look at it the other way round… if you run the lights 12/12, how much would the yield be reduced?? If it’s not linear with yield, maybe g/w would be better on less hours? I’m looking for the best electricity efficiency you could achieve with autos indoor. That’s a major limiting factor for many.
 

wh1p3dm34t

Modortalan
Supermod
Veteran
🦫 Special 🍆
Do you know the old dutch trick?
They used 1000w hps mixed with 600w hps to make a cut on electric cost, and you can do the same with autos as well, for example 2 hours 1000 w 2 hours 600 w, or something like that
 

Spaventa

...
Veteran
Do you know the old dutch trick?
They used 1000w hps mixed with 600w hps to make a cut on electric cost, and you can do the same with autos as well, for example 2 hours 1000 w 2 hours 600 w, or something like that
And they found an efficiency doing that? Ok, worth looking into also.
 

Spaventa

...
Veteran
Yes because sun is not constant, and energy is not used instantly, it takes 1-2 hours to convert it by the synthesis, it works yes
I get it. It’s at max saturation and dropping the watts for a while doesn’t even register because they remain fully satisfied for a period after the lights dim. Coooooool.

Edit. Just realised my unintentional pun because it would allow temps to drop too… another possible benefit if your otherwise struggling to hold temps with high intake temps.
 

bibi40

Well-known member
Ok so let’s look at it the other way round… if you run the lights 12/12, how much would the yield be reduced?? If it’s not linear with yield, maybe g/w would be better on less hours? I’m looking for the best electricity efficiency you could achieve with autos indoor. That’s a major limiting factor for many.
i did experiment 12/12 14/10 16/8 18/6 and 24/0
for me no doubt the 24h works better for me ,
for example with 12/12 i got like 30-40 grams from one plant wiht 18/6 was around 70-80 grams/plant and with 24/0 it' s always more 120-160 g/plants ( biggest result with this schedule was 262 gram from a plant )

you can check this thread , was a 24/24 auto grow :

 

Spaventa

...
Veteran
i did experiment 12/12 14/10 16/8 18/6 and 24/0
for me no doubt the 24h works better for me ,
for example with 12/12 i got like 30-40 grams from one plant wiht 18/6 was around 70-80 grams/plant and with 24/0 it' s always more 120-160 g/plants ( biggest result with this schedule was 262 gram from a plant )

you can check this thread , was a 24/24 auto grow :

That’s some diligent study and useful results, many thanks for sharing.
 

CharlesU Farley

Well-known member
All plants need a nighttime break to use their metabolic system. Running the photoperiod 24 hours a day is not in the auto plant's or any plant's best interest. Healthy plants have to have a nighttime break.

Is 24-hour light bad for plants?

Plants absorb light and convert it into energy. At night, when everything goes dark, respiration converts this energy into carbohydrates for later use. It means that exposing plants to light 24 hours a day can prevent respiration from occurring, which is also not conducive to healthy plant growth. Google

It depends mostly on genetics that is bred into the ruderalis. I see people running 18-hour photoperiods and getting killer results. If you run some keep us posted.
Looks like you and I are the only ones that are in the "plants need rest, let's take care of 'em and not overwork 'em, so they'll produce the type of "high" we want to experience" side of things in this thread. :)

I usually stay out of these auto discussions, because I'm totally ignorant of them and will never understand why people would grow / develop them if they're not in the far north and outdoors.

That being said, with all the talk of efficiency, increasing yields, etc., I still can't understand why you would develop/breed with a hemp type geno, that has absolutely no THC content?????? That _guarantees_ you're going to cut the potential amount of total amount of THC in whatever offspring you develop, versus the potential it would have if you didn't use the auto/hemp.

But what the fuck do I know, I'm just an old dinosaur???? :ROFLMAO: I run 16/8 during veg and 12/12 during flowering. Here's a shot from my tent an hour ago because I just changed the timers to switch to flowering. The plants most assuredly aren't autos but it's difficult for me to believe I could squeeze more "efficiency" or "yield" out of them, and I won't even mention topping, cutting, fimming, etc. :) :

d9d33bee-d4ea-4f6e-8091-eea9aa0f5093-1_all_4026.jpg


d9d33bee-d4ea-4f6e-8091-eea9aa0f5093-1_all_4034.jpg


Hard to get a pic without my Velcro girl getting in the pic.;)
 
Top