M
moose eater
Thanks everyone for these great response, I am grateful. But I was mainly wondering if local LEO ramped up enforcement of other minor infractions, that before legalization they simply ignored, so as to make up the shortfall in revenue that they no longer receive from the fining and prosecution of cannabis?
As stated near the bottom of my first reply, the Police here (Troopers and local) have for a long time tended to pigeon-hole certain vehicles, etc., and find ways to justify a stop for the purpose of what they refer to as pro-active policing.
Some of this has been tapered, or taken a step back, often as a matter of threats or reality of being taken to task. But they were engaging in this LONG ago, whether weed was legal, decrimmed, etc.
I'd give specific examples of embellished reasons for 'justified' stops, but it would be another half-page.
I'll add that a higher ranking officer in the State-wide Major Crimes unit boasted to me well over 20 years ago, that he could find a legit reason to pull any vehicle he desired. We knew each other socially for other reasons. I replied, "then what you're saying is that the 4th amendment is moot, by virtue of precedent and regulation. How does it make you feel to know the oath you swore has been turned into (silly putty)?"
So no, I haven't noted any increased efforts to enforce minor issues. They were already (selectively) doing that.. long ago.